Hi, I'm hoping I've merely got a wetware problem here and that
someone will point to a simple solution.
For a while I've been using nufraw as my raw-importer with 2.10, but
on my latest system builds that no-longer compiles (looks like
gcc-9.1.0 dislikes the C++ code). I got pointed to the github
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:57:05PM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
>
> > configure: == summary =
> > configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> > configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
> >
> Ah. He
On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
> configure: == summary =
> configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
>
Ah. Here is where things diverge:
configure:9400: == summary
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch via gimp-user-list
wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> > On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >
> > > install nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> > > and make it active with
> > > Edi
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:52:51AM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
> > ./autogen.sh;
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
> > make;
> > make install
> >
> Okay.
>
> > As far as I
On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
> ./autogen.sh;
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
> make;
> make install
>
Okay.
> As far as I can see, 0.42 was working with 2.8.22.
>
Any idea how to use it with 2.8?
There are no instruct
On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> install nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Impor
On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> install nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import anywhere.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
52
GIMP 2.8.22
UFRaw 0.22
linux 4.12.14-lp150.12.16-default x86_64
The current version of GIMP has gotten twitchy about return values from
UFRaw:
Opening '/path/to/image/image-001.nef' failed: Procedure
'file-ufraw-load' returned no return values
Well, hmphh!
Now I must open the image in UFRaw dire
On 03/14/18 12:51, Rick Strong wrote:
If you are talking about photographs, altering the curve is not the
same as boosting the exposure.
Generally speaking, boosting the exposure makes the whole picture
brighter, while playing with the curve alters areas--shadows,
mid-range, highlights--of the
play around with one to end up
with a result very similar to the other. This is best done in raw.
Rick S.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Aitken
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 1:45 AM
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve
Hi Folks,
Not sure
Hi Folks,
Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I
figured a number of users here might be able to answer. Please
redirect me if this is inappropriate.
Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the
base curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure? I'm
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Maurizio Loreti
wrote:
>
> > On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote:
> >
> > Pat—
> >
> > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a
> hard nut
> > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw
> in the
> > pr
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote:
>
> Pat—
>
> thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
> to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
> previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use.
Hello -
Pat—
thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use.
I will look at the alternatives you suggested.
Regards,
Glen
>I
It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw
processing softwares available? They are a little more actively developed
and will likely support newer cameras better. There's:
darktable: https://www.darktable.org
RawTherapee: http://www.rawtherapee.com
Each of these will let
Dear GIMP-ers—
I am running GIMP 2.8.20 on a Mac with Mavericks (Mac OS 10.9.5).
The previous version, 2.4, automatically included Ufraw and would open the .RW2
files from my Panasonic Lumix camera. (I was really impressed that it did.)
I now must install Ufraw for the newest GIMP, but for my li
* Alex Vergara Gil [04-22-16 14:10]:
> UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems
>
> Regards
>
> 2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
> >
> > UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> > but this is normally an add-on.
> >
> > On 15/04/16 16:16, sje
UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems
Regards
2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
>
> UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> but this is normally an add-on.
>
> On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
>> I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.
UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
but this is normally an add-on.
On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16. As i recall reading in the
documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled. I've tried to edit a .NEF (nikon)
raw f
I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16. As i recall reading in the
documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled. I've tried to edit a .NEF (nikon)
raw file with no joy. I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.
any idea what I'm missing?
tnx
--
sjemmett (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
__
* Daniel Glueck [04-10-16 15:07]:
> I want to load photos from my Canon. They are already on the Mac in CR2
> format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
>
> How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download? How
> do I know this? What menu
Could you tell us exactly what the error says?
What happens if you go to file -> open, and choose one of the raw files,
but choose CR2 from the file type list?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM Daniel Glueck wrote:
> I want to load photos from my Canon. They are already on the Mac in CR2
> format
I want to load photos from my Canon. They are already on the Mac in CR2
format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download? How
do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the
jon777, have you tried one of the other more modern, dedicated raw
processors such as darktable or RawTherapee?
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:16 AM jon777 wrote:
> >Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.
> >
> >Hope this helps.
> >Partha
> A simple explanation---the software
>Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.
>
>Hope this helps.
>Partha
A simple explanation---the software is not as good as some of the hype touting
"Open Source." Ufraw freezes on my when trying to open .CR2 files in windows 7
64 bit from Gimp.
Perhaps I need to stop trying
Ok Thanks all, it has been very helpful!
--
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https:
GIMP 2.9.1 (current experimental builds) handle 16/32 bit images just
fine. Feel free to download from my website as it comes with UFRaw
included.
In any case, you have not provided the RAW CR2 file and so it's hard
to see what is happening here. When you say that your CR2 image is
"tack" sharp, y
>I will try to use the tif. But could you try to answer this as well:
>
>If the original CR2 (RAW) file s sharp as nails (looks exactly the
>same as camera generated JPG) then how can the UFRaw generated picture
>be less sharp than the original RAW file?
I tried the tiff format but it does not see
>I tried the tiff format but it does not seems to make a lot of sense
>with Gimp.
>
>Gimp cannot handle 16-bit tiff images and i lose a lot that extra
>information from the 14-bit RAW file.
>
>Or am i missing something here?
>
>
>Also, why does my windows show that the jpg files are 24bit - should
>I will try to use the tif. But could you try to answer this as well:
>
>If the original CR2 (RAW) file s sharp as nails (looks exactly the
>same as camera generated JPG) then how can the UFRaw generated picture
>be less sharp than the original RAW file?
I believe that the CR2 files contain not onl
>Please see the attached images in my fist post.
If it is just the blurry nature of the UFRaw jpg then the answer is in your
original post - no sharpening has been applied, so you might expect it to be
blurry.
Have you tried processing the image with UFRaw but saving it in tif format, then
using
>If it is just the blurry nature of the UFRaw jpg then the answer is in
>your original post - no sharpening has been applied, so you might
>expect it to be blurry.
>
>Have you tried processing the image with UFRaw but saving it in tif
>format, then using something like Unsharp Mask 2 V0.12 in GIMP
>Shouldn't we have seen some sample images and know the UFRaw settings
>in
>order to judge that?
Please see the attached images in my fist post.
--
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@
On 08/25/2015 04:56 PM, programmer_ceds wrote:
>> What could cause UFRAW to mess up the images? Am i doing something
>> wrong or is it just crap?
>
> I don't think that UFRaw has messed up your image - it is simply that UFRaw
> doesn't have a sharpening option whereas your camera is sharpening
I tried to use UFRaw to convert my RAW files to jpg.
The problem is that the exported files are very blurry. The camera created jpg
files are nice and sharp.
If i view the RAW file with IrfanView then this is sharp too.
Denoise is set to 0, and JPG comp level is at 100. There does not seem to be
>I tried to use UFRaw to convert my RAW files to jpg.
>
>The problem is that the exported files are very blurry. The camera
>created jpg files are nice and sharp.
>
>If i view the RAW file with IrfanView then this is sharp too.
>
>Denoise is set to 0, and JPG comp level is at 100. There does not se
* Maurizio Loreti [07-10-14 12:58]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan
> wrote:
>
> > AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files. afaik,
> > there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files. I just
> > grepped my entire lensfun install and there is
Maurizio Loreti writes:
> I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun distribution, now
> hosted on sourceforge; under the URL
> http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are three
> files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and mil-can
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan
wrote:
> AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files. afaik,
> there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files. I just
> grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
> *any* xml file.
>
Abou
* Maurizio Loreti [07-10-14 09:32]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan
> wrote:
>
> > You don't have to, just replace the "compact-canon.xml" and/or
> > "slr-canon.xml" files with the one that contains the information you need.
> >
>
> *As I said*, replacing these files don't w
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan
wrote:
> You don't have to, just replace the "compact-canon.xml" and/or
> "slr-canon.xml" files with the one that contains the information you need.
>
*As I said*, replacing these files don't work; their xml format is
different.
If I replace the
* Maurizio Loreti [07-10-14 04:37]:
[...]
> I have problems with the "lensfun" corrections to my photo pictures; I
> am not sure if this is related to GIMP itself, or to the Mac port I am
> using.
>
> What happens is:
>
> if I open a Canon RAW image (a CR2 file), GIMP recalls the "ufraw"
> plug
Hello, list -
I am a satisfied GIMP user, and I am using the skl's "Mac on OS X" 2.8.10p2
release running under OS X 10.9.4.
I have problems with the "lensfun" corrections to my photo pictures; I am not
sure if this is related to GIMP itself, or to the Mac port I am using.
What happens is:
if
Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.
Hope this helps.
Partha
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
> > I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to
> open...Please
> > help :(
>
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
> I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to open...Please
> help :(
Is this on the Mac? on Linux? (which distribution exactly?) on Microsoft
Windows (which version? XP? 7?) Which version of gimp exactly? Where did
you get it
Hi,
without knowing more about the GIMP version, the operating system,
your camera model and and the UFRaw version you use it's hard to give
an advice.
At least the Ufraw GIMP plug-in is known to be troublesome mostly on
Windows, see http://registry.gimp.org/node/31 and
https://bugzilla.gnome.org
I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to open...Please
help :(
--
EGoldman (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l
When in UFRaw and clicking the "Send Image to Gimp" icon in the lower right
corrner of the screen, I get the following error message.
Error Activating GIMP. Failed to execute helper program (Invalid Argument).
Need help resolving this error.
Thanks,
Richard
--
rmagers (via www.gimpusers.com
>Maybe I'll seem a bit stupid as I'm not sure whether I got it right,
>but as far as I understand, the advice was to copy the images to your
>hard drive instead of trying to process them right on the card (or in
>your camera). Just create a folder and copy via right-click menu, or
>select the files
Maybe I'll seem a bit stupid as I'm not sure whether I got it right, but as far
as I understand, the advice was to copy the images to your hard drive instead
of trying to process them right on the card (or in your camera). Just create a
folder and copy via right-click menu, or select the files a
>Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
>before working on them.
>
>You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
>camera connections somtimes.
>
>Liam
Thanks Liam, how would one do that? I see the card in "computer" (vista) but if
I hit copy
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0100, Ebizjoey wrote:
> [...] it is intermittent, like yesterday it was doing it and
> today it is not, same files.
Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
before working on them.
You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow card
>* Ebizjoey [11-29-12 13:18]:
>I have seen this, when the photo did not get written completely to the
>card. But this happens before you get to the computer...
>Open one of the troubled files with geeqie or xv and see if the file
>has
>problems before ufraw presents it to gimp. Or see if you can
* Ebizjoey [11-29-12 13:18]:
> I shoot in raw so I open from there, problem is that frequently the file
> will open good the first 2/3's (two thirds from top to bottom) and than
> have a line, and the rest is dark and does not show up in Gimp (this
> darkened part).
I have seen this, when the ph
I shoot in raw so I open from there, problem is that frequently the file will
open good the first 2/3's (two thirds from top to bottom) and than have a line,
and the rest is dark and does not show up in Gimp (this darkened part).
I am not real knowledgeable so any advice would be appreciated, than
files\ufraw\bin\xx.dll
(from Pastingal)
and then reinstalled ufraw. now it works!
oh yeah!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Shanahan
Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
Datum: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:40:34 -0400
An: gimp-users
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw
>* Bettina [03-
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
> An: gimp-users
> Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw
>
> >* Bettina [03-14-12 05:09]:
> >> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
> >>
> >> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't ope
of course I was searching. but I couldn't find any entry
with that problem.
but anyway, thank you for your hint.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Shanahan
Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
Datum: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
An: gimp-users
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user]
* Bettina [03-14-12 05:09]:
> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
>
> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
> windows 7
>
> Error message:
> The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
> Reinstall ufraw to solve th
Hello,
I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
windows 7
Error message:
The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
I reinstalled without succ
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM, kevin wrote:
> In another thread a person was advised to use Darktable to process RAW images.
>
> I currently use UFRaw so: What advantages does Darktable have over UFRaw?
http://www.darktable.org/features/, eh? ;-)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.o
In another thread a person was advised to use Darktable to process RAW images.
I currently use UFRaw so: What advantages does Darktable have over UFRaw?
Cheers,
Kev
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l
63 matches
Mail list logo
