Ack!, I suck. Sorry. I hadn't realized we'd gone through most of
them, which itself is a good thing. I'll get some new ones added
first thing in the morning. Sorry.
-Jakob
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Paolo Castagna
wrote:
> """
> To help new contributors pitch in quickly, we maintain a s
On 5 April 2012 05:49, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Ack!, I suck. Sorry. I hadn't realized we'd gone through most of
> them, which itself is a good thing. I'll get some new ones added
> first thing in the morning. Sorry.
Do we have something around "document a workflow to get RDF graph data
into Gira
Dan, you're definitely right that this has been mentioned a few times.
The multigraph issue is one part of it, but a helper VertexInputFormat
(and maybe VertexOutputFormat) would certainly still help as you
mention. Can you please open a JIRA (and help if you have time)?
Avery
On 4/5/12 1:4
Hi Dan,
I have not an answer to your questions/observations yet.
However, I suspect N-Triples | N-Quads might not be the best option for
something like Giraph. Something more like an adjacency list might be
better.
So, my intuition, is that if you start with RDF in N-Triples format,
the first ste
Here is a related JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-155
Avery
On 4/5/12 9:45 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi Dan,
I have not an answer to your questions/observations yet.
However, I suspect N-Triples | N-Quads might not be the best option for
something like Giraph. Something more
On 5 April 2012 17:05, Avery Ching wrote:
> Dan, you're definitely right that this has been mentioned a few times. The
> multigraph issue is one part of it, but a helper VertexInputFormat (and
> maybe VertexOutputFormat) would certainly still help as you mention. Can
> you please open a JIRA (an
Sorry, took a couple days to get some time, but have now created 8 new
newbie JIRAs. This should be enough for our new contributors to each
do a couple to get used the hang of contributing to Giraph. Thanks
Paolo for the reminder!
-Jakob
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> O
