Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-14 Thread Jakob Homan
> could you remove /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? Done. thanks for the update.

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Hyunsik Choi
There is a typo error. The following is correct: could you remove /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Jakob, > > To update the site, I moved /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph to giraph_. > This is because I could no

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Hyunsik Choi
Jakob, To update the site, I moved /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph to giraph_. This is because I could not remove the original site of giraph due to permission but I could move it. For clear, could you remove /var/www/ incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? Thank you, -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, N

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Hyunsik Choi
Thank you for the nice instruction. I've updated the rsync command for group permission. -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes >

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Jakob Homan
I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > +1 > > This way is the best for us :) > > -- > Hyunsik Choi > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Hyunsik Choi
+1 This way is the best for us :) -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and > copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. >

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-13 Thread Jakob Homan
Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks.

Re: better way to update site?

2011-11-11 Thread Avery Ching
+1. Having the pre-generated files in svn is good enough for me. Avery On 11/11/11 1:36 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: As Avery documented in GIRAPH-36 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-35?focusedCommentId=13107195&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comme

better way to update site?

2011-11-11 Thread Jakob Homan
As Avery documented in GIRAPH-36 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-35?focusedCommentId=13107195&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13107195) it's pretty painful to update the site currently. This is due to the fact that we're keeping the site