tree f8a746aca3ca8aeb832d83e9297f2ffe636082c6
parent b4b08e581fac8e0ba9ae348bdc13246c9798c99e
author Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:21:30 -0700
committer Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:21:30 -0700
Revert PCIBIOS_MIN_IO changes for 2.6.13
This reverts
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I export those two changesets as patches, and send them on.
presumably I lose the changset comments etc.
Well, you can export them with git send-email and you won't be losing
any comments.
Yes, except the command is git format-patch. Not just
Using the $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY/info/alternates mechanism,
create a new repository that borrows objects from the original
repository when --shared flag is given in addition to --local.
It is worth pointing out that the cloned repository depends on
the original repository, so this should be used
Marco,
How do I get this to build on Debian? Not familiar with scons, and it
is complaining that it can't find qt and related header files, when
they are there...
It's been mentioned on the list that v0.3 didn't build on Debian, but
I thought it had been dealt with. There were no fixes mentioned
Dear diary, on Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:57:13AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternatively, use git cherry, which helps re-order the commits in your
tree. They'll be _new_ commits, but they'll have the
Dear diary, on Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:33:53AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote:
And how are things lining up for the upcoming one (January 2006, Dunedin,
NZ)?
Dunno yet. I have a policy of trying
Hi, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:47:25PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
I think it does not in real setups, since thanks to O_RDWR the
file should be overwritten only when the write() happens.
Can a 41-byte write() be non-atomic in any real conditions?
if
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:04:19PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Marco,
How do I get this to build on Debian? Not familiar with scons, and it
is complaining that it can't find qt and related header files, when
they are there...
You just need to add -I/usr/include/qt3/ in the appropriate
Hello Git,
At this time we can offer a small update at our system - BD-MAGAZINE Issue
N1,2,3,4,5!
... When it's late at night , all ya really need is some midnight passion.
See
a video few sweet young models show fashion for your passion within these pages.
Tanya, Marisha, Oksana and
Is there (in cogito) a way to start a branch off from an older
commit?
Assume I receive a patch whichis based on an old version which I want
to test first (and resolve problems) in a separate branch.
This was what I tried:
* Clone main repo:
- cg-clone /git/u-boot u-boot-testing
After having done a cvs import of Moodle using git-cvsimport-script
all the cvs branches show up as heads. How do I switch heads within a
checkout? cogito doesn't seem to be able to, and I'm unsure on how to
do it with git.
And I am confused about the difference between heads and branches. Git
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After having done a cvs import of Moodle using git-cvsimport-script
all the cvs branches show up as heads. How do I switch heads within a
checkout? cogito doesn't seem to be able to, and I'm unsure on how to
do it with git.
The documentation may be
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is great - especially for places like kernel.org, where a lot
of repos end up being related to each other, yet independent.
Yes. There is one shortcoming in the current git-clone -s in
the proposed updates branch. If the parent
Just do
git checkout branch-name
to switch between them.
thanks! I was doing cg-branch-chg branch-name and it wasn't working.
So in a cvsimport, you'll never see a merge back to the head, even if one
technically took place.
There may be some surprises in here! gitk --all shows
The behaviour of the symlinked in ref directories has changed from
earlier versions of git. They used to be taken into account in
git-fsck-cache --unreachable. The code in question would simply stat
the contents of .git/refs and recursively expand any S_ISDIR. Now the
code does an lstat and
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Matt Draisey wrote:
The behaviour of the symlinked in ref directories has changed from
earlier versions of git.
Hmm.. There used to be a mix of lstat() (in receive-pack) and stat() (in
fsck-cache.c, and it got standardized in one function which used lstat.
The reason
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 06:15:40PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
Ryan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Source Code Management with Git
More bugging...
Ok, I think I've got all this addressed (plus the other email).
It just took me a lot longer to get to it than I planned.
Junio, do you
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:11:50AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Ryan Anderson:
#!/bin/sh
echo Don't get a git - use gt!
Ouch.
:) I meant it as a joke, obviously. I also thinkoed the sentence I was
aiming for, thus losing the humor. Oh well.
echo Don't get a git
Add a SYNOPSIS/release summary to the tree.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/SYNOPSIS b/SYNOPSIS
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SYNOPSIS
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Source Code Management with git
+
+In Linus's own words as the creator of git:
+git can mean anything,
Matt Draisey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The behaviour of the symlinked in ref directories has changed from
earlier versions of git. They used to be taken into account in
git-fsck-cache --unreachable.
Can the previous behaviour be reinstated?
I would not have much problem accepting a patch
Ryan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junio, do you want to pull this into the git tree?
Yes, but I have been wondering where it should go. Should it go
under Documentation/ and made into html via asciidoc along with
other tools?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
21 matches
Mail list logo
