Boost the selection of shoes Nike free run indefinitely.
A lot of people on the planet every day wearing a nike free
http://www.nikefreerunaustraliaonline.org run shoes. You will find
there's huge selection of species. The Nike free run footwear history there
has been great
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Thanks for the thorough explanation. Perhaps some of that could make
it's way into the commit message?
It's fine with me if it doesn't, since the original commit message
covers the basics (current behavior and intent of the change) in its
first two paragraphs and anyone
Am 10/30/2012 22:28, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
Am 29.10.2012 08:11, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 10/29/2012 0:28, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
+ /* Remove trailing '/' from directories to find submodules in the index
*/
+ for (i = 0; i argc; i++) {
+ size_t pathlen = strlen(argv[i]);
+
On 10/30/2012 11:17 PM, Elia Pinto wrote:
Thanks. I know that posix support these usages, but exists some
traditional shell that not support it.
True, but those shells are not POSIX shells -- the major example that
comes to mind is the accursed Solaris /bin/sh.
Since Git assumes a POSIX shell
[quotes heavily cut down by me]
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 30.10.2012 21:15:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see
Dropping the Cc list, as this is off topic
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:05:29PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Thanks for the thorough explanation. Perhaps some of that could make
it's way into the commit message?
It's fine with me if it doesn't, since the original
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
For the record, Johannes is not the only one being kept from looking at
this series (further) by the tone of this discussion. Per hominem
attacks are neither professional nor helpful. We prefer to discuss code
here, just code.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 08:45:45PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I'd suggest a 3 level branch hierachy (IOW: the lower level
is rebased ontop of the next higher level):
* #0: upstream branch
* #1: generic local maintenance branch
* #2: per-instance cutomization branches
Normal additions
Looks fixed here too
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Mike Norman mknor...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked and the issue seems to be fixed! Clicked around on a
bunch of previously broken links and they work!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Holger Hellmuth (IKS)
hellm...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Orgad Shaneh
Any news? This still doesn't work with 1.8.0.
Nope, sorry. It's still in my todo list.
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
[+cc git@vger; please keep discussion on the list]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:26:51PM +0800, 乙酸鋰 wrote:
POST /git/Cat1/SubCat1/xsp.git/git-upload-pack HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: git/1.8.0
Host: localhost
Accept-Encoding: gzip
Content-Type: application/x-git-upload-pack-request
Accept:
When we gzip the post data for a smart-http rpc request, we
compute the gzip body and its size inside the use_gzip
conditional. We keep track of the body after the conditional
ends, but not the size. Let's remember both, which will
enable us to retry failed gzip requests in a future patch.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Peter Baumann waste.mana...@gmx.de wrote:
Dropping the Cc list, as this is off topic
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:05:29PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Thanks for the thorough explanation. Perhaps some of that could make
it's way into
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:05:05AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
however (what got me started wondering about this and a point i forgot
about) - t2/one/test doesn't show up under 'untracked files' in in
status that scenario. shouldn't it?
Yes, I think that is a bug.
My guess is that the
(oops, now my email was rejected)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
(again because the mailing list rejected it) (Gmal switched interface
and HTML is the default)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Chris Rorvick ch...@rorvick.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:57AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Something like this seems to fix it for me, but I am not sure if that
would affect other callers.
[...]
+ return !is_dir || !S_ISGITLINK(istate-cache[pos]-ce_mode);
That's completely wrong, of course. It should be:
Hi,
Sorry, forgot to reply-to-all, here is my response again:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Arthur a.fou...@amesys.fr wrote:
The problem :
Importing revision 7727 (100%)Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/git-p4, line 3183, in module
main()
File /usr/bin/git-p4,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:43:51PM +, Matt Kraai wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhagger at alum.mit.edu writes:
...
-static int parse_dirstat_params(struct diff_options *options, const char
...
+static int parse_dirstat_params(struct diff_options *options, const char
...
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:53:27AM +0100, Peter Baumann wrote:
covers the basics (current behavior and intent of the change) in its
first two paragraphs and anyone wanting more detail can use
GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/remotes/charon/notes/full \
git show --show-notes commit
to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:05:34AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:58 PM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
This allows other
Hi all,
I am forwarding a reply I got from a message I sent to git user mailing
list because of a bad pack header error (more information below).
I will forward another email where I give all the git versions of my system.
Any clue on this would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Kevin
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:57:36PM +0100, kevin molcard wrote:
I tried to install git 1.8 on the remote server and get exactly the
same problem :(.
[...]
Sometimes (very often when several git clone are sent at the same
time), I have the following error:
remote: internal server error
Hi all again,
here is my second email :).
It contains the git versions in my system.
FYI, I updated git to 1.8.0 on my remote but still having the same issue.
Another thing that might be interesting is that it seems to happen only
when cloning from Windows build machine (i.e. I send 2 clone
Yes I can,
can you tell me how I have to do that?
thanks
Kevin
On 10/31/12 3:19 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:57:36PM +0100, kevin molcard wrote:
I tried to install git 1.8 on the remote server and get exactly the
same problem :(.
[...]
Sometimes (very often when several
I forgot to mention that I am using scm manager:
https://bitbucket.org/sdorra/scm-manager/wiki/Home
So that maybe the custom layer you are talking about.
Kevin
On 10/31/12 3:19 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:57:36PM +0100, kevin molcard wrote:
I tried to install git 1.8 on
Usievaład Čorny venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 15:39:
Hello!
When I type comment message in Git Gui (1.8.0 and previous), I can't
use Ŭŭ letter (U+016C, U+016D) — it just transforms into simple Uu.
Please fix it.
Can you tell us more about your environment (LANG setting, OS)? I just
made
Ok. I use Win7 sp1, syslang — be_BY, git version 1.8.0.msysgit.0 („git
version“ command).
Problem appears when I type this letter on keyboard; when I copy-paste
it everyrhing is ok.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Usievaład Čorny venit, vidit,
Usievaład Čorny venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:08:
Ok. I use Win7 sp1, syslang — be_BY, git version 1.8.0.msysgit.0 („git
version“ command).
Problem appears when I type this letter on keyboard; when I copy-paste
it everyrhing is ok.
That is interesting. It means git-gui can make the commit
No, commit is the same as input. Only when I press key combination for
Ŭŭ (AltGr+Uu [like AltGr+Cc for Ćć, this works]) — simple Uu appears
in text form. Every other special letter (Šš, Čč, Žž, Śś, Łł, Źź, Ćć)
works.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
[quotes heavily cut down by me]
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 30.10.2012 21:15:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe
Usievaład Čorny venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:27:
No, commit is the same as input. Only when I press key combination for
Ŭŭ (AltGr+Uu [like AltGr+Cc for Ćć, this works]) — simple Uu appears
in text form. Every other special letter (Šš, Čč, Žž, Śś, Łł, Źź, Ćć)
works.
So it's really the
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
This is precisely ad hominem; you are ignoring the code, not because
of the code, because of the person. This is as ad hominem as it gets.
I am not rejecting your code (I reviewed an early series) but reject the
communication style and
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
For the record, Johannes is not the only one being kept from looking at
this series (further) by the tone of this discussion. Per hominem
attacks are neither
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
This is precisely ad hominem; you are ignoring the code, not because
of the code, because of the person. This is as ad hominem as it gets.
I am not
Sorry for resending, but the previous version got dropped from the
main git mailing list due to a HTML-subpart. Converted to plain-text.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Erik Faye-Lund kusmab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:24 PM, mnaou...@gmail.com wrote:
If you add pre-receive
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:36AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:43:51PM +, Matt Kraai wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhagger at alum.mit.edu writes:
+ if (*params_copy)
params_copy is set to the value returned by xstrdup, which cannot be NULL.
This check can be
Hi!
(Cc:-ed the Git development list.)
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
PERF-VERSION-GEN and specifically the git commands are the
cause of more delay than the config checks, especially when
doing the build in a VM with the kernel source on an NFS
mount.
Yes, I have
Am 31.10.2012 03:28, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's all fun and games to write explanations for things, but it's not
that easy when you want those explanations to be actually true, and
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
Didn't think so. The truth of the matter is that it doesn't matter
what I do code-wise.
Just try, seriously.
All right.
First of all, I clone the
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
I really like some of the directions the series is taking, and as the
maintainer, I'd like to pick it up.
Code-wise, I agree.
But there is a big question mark for me still about how it relates to
the work in msysgit, especially:
- What
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Am 31.10.2012 03:28, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
Yeah, that would be nice. Too bad I don't have that information, and
have _zero_ motivation to go and get it for you.
Just to clarify: That information is not just for Jonathan,
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
- What disadvantages? If this implementation goes into git.git,
the msysgit one is likely to wane in popularity. What will we be
losing by doing so? If the answer is not nothing, how hard
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems this issue is still
unfixed: instead of
reset refs/heads/blub
from e7510461b7db54b181d07acced0ed3b1ada072c8
I get
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems this issue is still
unfixed: instead of
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
How about performance?
174.038642915 seconds time elapsed
Compared to;
340.976843750 seconds time elapsed
Looks like there's something to improve in this area, but I wouldn't
be surprised if
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending words.
But maybe the Git maintainers are okay with such a tone on this list?
Hth,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending words.
But maybe the
Hello,
Git-gui is not working on my Mac Book Pro. Here's relevant info. Any
help getting this to work would be appriciated.
$sw_vers -productVersion
10.7.5
$git --version
git version 1.8.0
$git gui
error: git-gui died of signal 11
$
This electronic mail message contains information that
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
And finally, what do more do you expect me to do? About the code, and
only the code.
The analysis that does in the log messages is an important part of code in
this project, so that may be a good place to start. Both Jonathan and J6t asked
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending
words.
But maybe the Git maintainers are okay with such a tone
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Junio wanted a more general solution, adding infrastructure to the
rev-list engine that I did not need -- and did not see the need for,
either -- and given the amount of time I had invested in a working
remote-hg and given that I needed it
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Daniel Barkalow barka...@iabervon.org wrote:
I think that may be true where you have next in both places, but I
think:
$ git checkout -b new-branch master
$ git fast-export ^master new-branch
ought to emit no commit lines, but needs to emit a reset line.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
And finally, what do more do you expect me to do? About the code, and
only the code.
The analysis that does in the log messages is an important part of code in
this
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Junio wanted a more general solution, adding infrastructure to the
rev-list engine that I did not need -- and did not see the need for,
either -- and given the amount
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
How about performance?
174.038642915 seconds time elapsed
Compared to;
340.976843750 seconds time elapsed
57 matches
Mail list logo
