Jeff King p...@peff.net napisał:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:47:51AM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
it still ends up as a single function call). The downside is
that it has
to be remembered at each site that uses strcasecmp, but we do
not use
pointers to standard library functions very
On 09/20/2013 04:48 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Hi all,
First of all a big thank you to all for making git. With it being fast
and cheap (in relation to bandwidth and sizes for subsequent checkouts
as well as CPU usage) . Please CC me if somebody does answer this mail
as I'm not subscribed to
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:55:36PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
I'm not sure I understand correctly. I see that bitmaps can be used to
implement set operations. But how comes that walking the graph requires
a lot
of CPU?
Commit a908047 taught format-patch the --from option,
which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
documentation claims that it will omit the in-body header
when it is the same as the rfc822 header, but the code never
Commit 05c1eb1 (push: teach --force-with-lease to smart-http
transport) fixed the compare-and-swap test in t5541. It
tried to mark the test as passing by teaching the test
helper function to expect an extra success or failure
parameter, but forgot to actually use the parameter in the
helper.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:38:17AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
I'm using notes in my project. I'm wondering if it's possible to save
the state of the notes when I'm releasing/tagging a new version of my
project so I can restore the saved notes state if I checkout back the
old release.
Dear Junio,
thanks for your answer and you availability to revise the man text. Below my
(irreverent) comments
On Thursday 19 September 2013 10:43:16 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Let's see how we can improve the text. Points to notice are:
* by updating the index and the files does not say how
Hi,
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
The keepalive patch is not in any released version yet, but we have been
running it in production at GitHub for a few weeks.
That is good to hear; I'd feel safer to bump the scheduled
graduation date to 'master' for the topic in that case.
Like
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland jo...@herland.net
---
templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
index 586e3bf..68d62d5 100755
--- a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
Hello Team,
We wish to use GITSCC plug-in with PowerBuilder for application
source-control with GIT GUI,
We downloaded GitScc.msi setup file from PushOK website, unfortunately when
file was downloaded and before we could initialize installation
Symantec Endpoint Protection reported
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
My original question was going to be: why bother peeling at all if we
are just going to push the outer objects, anyway?
And after staring at it, I somehow convinced myself that the answer was
that you were pushing both. But that is not the case. Sorry for the
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:22:01AM +0930, Martin Gregory wrote:
When something goes wrong, there appears to be no way to understand what
git thinks it's reading. I'm not sure if such a way, if it existed, would
help with
trailing spaces, but if you could
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
You mean people that provide their
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Commit a908047 taught format-patch the --from option,
which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
documentation claims that it will omit the in-body header
when it is the same as the
When run that command immediate after git bisect start somebody sees
the full commit range as defined in git bisect start.
However running that command later after few git bisect steps somebody
is just presented with the remaining commit interval.
Is this intended ?
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf
On 09/20/2013 08:22 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Toralf,
Toralf Förster wrote:
When run that command immediate after git bisect start somebody sees
the full commit range as defined in git bisect start.
However running that command later after few git bisect steps somebody
is just
Hi Toralf,
Toralf Förster wrote:
When run that command immediate after git bisect start somebody sees
the full commit range as defined in git bisect start.
However running that command later after few git bisect steps somebody
is just presented with the remaining commit interval.
Is this
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:17:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Commit a908047 taught format-patch the --from option,
which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
documentation
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
So I think it should be possible to fix our internal consumers
... I'm a little wary
of external consumers that might get confused by it.
Yeah, thanks for a good summary of analysis. I agree that it would
be doable, but it is dubious if it is worth it.
---
David Aguilar wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
You
- Ursprungligt meddelande -
Från: Ram Kunchur ram.kunc...@travelex.com
Till: git@vger.kernel.org
Kopia: Daren Scott daren.sc...@travelex.com, Rajen Shah
rajen.s...@travelex.com, Sagar Keluskar
sagar.kelus...@travelex.com
Skickat: fredag, 20 sep 2013 16:17:38
Ämne: GIT Plug-in for
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
The fifth batch of topics are in 'master'. We are about to pass 350
non-merge commits since the last release, which means we are halfway
there
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com writes:
When one performance test fails, the testing is aborted and the cleanup
commands are not executed anymore, leaving the trash directory in the
failed state.
Ah,
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 10.09.2013 00:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
* bc/submodule-status-ignored (2013-09-04) 2 commits
- submodule: don't print status output with ignore=all
- submodule: fix confusing variable name
Originally merged to 'next' on 2013-08-22
Will
Junio C Hamano gitster-v...@pobox.com writes:
I also agree that the documentation is misstated; remote-tracking branch
may have been a convenient and well understood phrase for whoever wrote
that part, but the --prune is designed to cull extra refs in the
hierarchies into
which refs would be
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
But I think that points to a larger problem, which is that we do
not want to just look at the entries that are different between the
tree and the index.
True. The unpack-trees API knows how to walk the index and trees in
parallel, and I tend to
r.duc...@gmail.com writes:
mmm maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the first statement
on the index (above) is oversimplifing.
Yes, it was simplified to illustrate the principle, not even trying
to be exhaustive.
The principle is that we allow you to check out a different branch
when you
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
David Aguilar wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will this not conflict
- describe when it is still applicable
- tell people where to go for most normal cases
Signed-off-by: Sitaram Chamarty sita...@atc.tcs.com
---
ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/159633. Yes
it's very old but better late than never.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
David Aguilar wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13
31 matches
Mail list logo
