Heikki Hokkanen h...@users.sf.net writes:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Gah! This adds a fork+exec each time the prompt is shown. Not good,
particularly on Windows.
Since your intent is to disable the prompt in the home directory,
wouldn't that mean
Overriding an @additional_branch_refs configuration variable with
value ('wip') will make gitweb to show branches that appear in
refs/heads and refs/wip (refs/heads is hardcoded). Might be useful for
gerrit setups where user branches are not stored under refs/heads/.
Signed-off-by: Krzesimir
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Krzesimir Nowak krzesi...@endocode.com writes:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Krzesimir Nowak krzesi...@endocode.com writes:
Running 'make GITWEB_WANTED_REFS=heads wip gitweb.cgi' will create a
On 26/11/13 04:06, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrés G. Aragoneses
kno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/13 02:18, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Have you run the tests with this patch? It seems that it breaks
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Andrés G. Aragoneses
kno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 04:06, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrés G. Aragoneses
kno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/13 02:18, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Junio C Hamano
From 4f3b24379090b7b69046903fba494f3191577b20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9s=20G=2E=20Aragoneses?= kno...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:38:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] transport: Catch non positive --depth option value
Instead of simply ignoring the value passed to
jrnie...@gmail.com wrote on Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:58 -0800:
The git p4import documentation has suggested git p4 as a better
alternative for more than 6 years. (According to the mailing list
discussion when it was moved to contrib/, git-p4import has serious
bugs --- e.g., its incremental mode
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
Dumb commit walker does not care about .git/shallow and until someone
steps up to make it happen, let's not publish shallow clones using
dumb protocols.
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
When we receive a pack and the shallow points from another repository,
we may want to add more shallow points to current repo to make sure no
commits point to nowhere.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Hmph. the use of -util field in this patch feels that it was
something commit-slab data structure was invented to solve.
Good stuff! Thanks.
+ if (c-util == NULL)
+ c-util = bitmap;
+
Am 26.11.2013 01:04, schrieb Nick Townsend:
My first git patch - so shout out if I’ve got the etiquette wrong! Or
of course if I’ve missed something.
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a reply to the first one, or both as replies to a cover letter),
Some buffers created with PATH_MAX length are not checked when being
written, and can overflow if PATH_MAX is not big enough to hold the
path.
Some of the use-case are probably impossible to reach, and the program
dies if the path looks too long. When it would be possible for the user
to use a
Am 25.11.2013 22:01, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Looking good to me. Please add tests for diff.ignoreSubmodules
and submodule.name.ignore, the latter both in .gitmodules and
.git/config. While doing some testing for this thread I found an
inconsistency
Am 26.11.2013 16:17, schrieb René Scharfe:
Am 26.11.2013 01:04, schrieb Nick Townsend:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-archive.txt b/Documentation/git-archive.txt
index b97aaab..b4df735 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-archive.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-archive.txt
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
Hi,
Thanks for tackling this. This review will be kind of nitpicky, as a
way to save time when reviewing future patches.
Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote:
From 4f3b24379090b7b69046903fba494f3191577b20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9s=20G=2E=20Aragoneses?= kno...@gmail.com
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 25.11.2013 22:01, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Looking good to me. Please add tests for diff.ignoreSubmodules
and submodule.name.ignore, the latter both in .gitmodules and
.git/config. While doing some testing
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
Some buffers created with PATH_MAX length are not checked when being
written, and can overflow if PATH_MAX is not big enough to hold the
path.
Perhaps it is time to update all of them to use strbuf? The callers
of prefix_filename() aren't that many,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I have a feeling that the
current not copy to fix it to a stable value, but look into
.gitmodules as a fallback was not a designed behaviour for the
other properties, but was done by accident and/or laziness.
It was designed.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Pushing from a shallow clone using today's send-pack and receive-pack
may work, if the transferred pack does not end up at any graft
points. If it does, recent receive-pack that does connectivity check
will reject
A #! line in these files is misleading, since these scriptlets are
meant to be sourced with '.' (using whatever shell sources them)
instead of run directly using the interpreter named on the #! line.
Removing the #! line shouldn't hurt syntax highlighting since
these files have filenames ending
Krzesimir Nowak krzesi...@endocode.com writes:
Overriding an @additional_branch_refs configuration variable with
value ('wip') will make gitweb to show branches that appear in
refs/heads and refs/wip (refs/heads is hardcoded). Might be useful for
gerrit setups where user branches are not
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a reply to the first one, or both as replies to a cover letter),
though -- that makes commenting on them much easier.
Side note: Documentation/SubmittingPatches doesn't mention that
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I have a feeling that the
current not copy to fix it to a stable value, but look into
.gitmodules as a fallback was not a designed behaviour for the
other properties, but was done by
Andrés G. Aragoneses kno...@gmail.com writes:
From 4f3b24379090b7b69046903fba494f3191577b20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9s=20G=2E=20Aragoneses?= kno...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:38:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] transport: Catch non positive --depth option value
Hi,
I like where this is going.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:17:43PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 26.11.2013 01:04, schrieb Nick Townsend:
+ strbuf_addstr(dotgit, work_tree);
+ strbuf_addch(dotgit, '/');
+ if (args-treepath) {
+
Am 26.11.2013 23:18, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a reply to the first one, or both as replies to a cover letter),
though -- that makes commenting on them much easier.
Side note:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
clone_local() does not handle $SRC/shallow. It could be made so, but
it's simpler to use fetch-pack/upload-pack instead.
This used by be caught by the check in upload-pack, which is triggered
s/used by/used to/
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh b/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh
index e011ead..95b6313 100755
--- a/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh
+++ b/t/t5536-fetch-shallow.sh
@@ -141,4 +141,26 @@ EOF
)
'
On 26 Nov 2013, at 16:28, René Scharfe l@web.de wrote:
Am 26.11.2013 23:18, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a reply to the first one, or both as replies to a cover letter),
though --
On 26 Nov 2013, at 14:38, Heiko Voigt hvo...@hvoigt.net wrote:
Hi,
I like where this is going.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:17:43PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 26.11.2013 01:04, schrieb Nick Townsend:
+ strbuf_addstr(dotgit, work_tree);
+ strbuf_addch(dotgit, '/');
On 26 Nov 2013, at 14:18, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a reply to the first one, or both as replies to a cover letter),
though -- that makes commenting on them much
On 26 Nov 2013, at 07:17, René Scharfe l@web.de wrote:
Am 26.11.2013 01:04, schrieb Nick Townsend:
My first git patch - so shout out if I’ve got the etiquette wrong! Or
of course if I’ve missed something.
Thanks for the patches! Please send only one per message (the second
one as a
32 matches
Mail list logo
