Re: [PATCH] remote-hg: do not fail on invalid bookmarks

2013-12-29 Thread Antoine Pelisse
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Antoine Pelisse wrote: >> Mercurial can have bookmarks pointing to "nullid" (the empty root >> revision), while Git can not have references to it. >> When cloning or fetching from a Mercurial repositor

[PATCH/RFC] Introduce git submodule add|update --attach

2013-12-29 Thread Francesco Pretto
Hello everybody, by default "git submodule" performs its add or update operations on a detached HEAD. This works well when using an existing full-fledged/indipendent project as the submodule, as there's less frequent need to update it or commit back changes. When the submodule is actually a large

Re: [PATCH] remote-hg: do not fail on invalid bookmarks

2013-12-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Antoine Pelisse wrote: > Mercurial can have bookmarks pointing to "nullid" (the empty root > revision), while Git can not have references to it. > When cloning or fetching from a Mercurial repository that has such a > bookmark, the import will fail because

[PATCH] remote-hg: do not fail on invalid bookmarks

2013-12-29 Thread Antoine Pelisse
Mercurial can have bookmarks pointing to "nullid" (the empty root revision), while Git can not have references to it. When cloning or fetching from a Mercurial repository that has such a bookmark, the import will fail because git-remote-hg will not be able to create the corresponding reference. Wa