W dniu 2014-03-27 19:50, David A. Dalrymple (and Bhushan G. Lodha) pisze:
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This function type previously accepted separate regex_t and kwset_t
parameters, which conceptually go together. Here we create a struct to
encapsulate them, in
W dniu 2014-04-03 23:44, Junio C Hamano pisze:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
With that approach you depend on the hunk header and apparently need
to add XDL_EMIT_MOREFUNCNAMES and XDL_EMIT_MOREHUNKHEADS to improve
the results. This approach feels fragile.
Would it perhaps be more robust
Good day,
I'm not sure if it a real bug or just a functionality fix but this is my issue.
What I wanted to do :
Stash non committed change, but forgot to close a file that had uncommitted
change and was write lock.
What I did :
Git stash
What happen
Git stash created the stash and try to
This patch series contain the
use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
patches not already merged in ep/shell-command-substitution
in the mantainer repository. It is the version 3 of the
patch series.
I changed the commit message in accordance with those approved,
and I have rebased
Hi,
Elia Pinto wrote:
This patch series contain the
use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
patches not already merged in ep/shell-command-substitution
in the mantainer repository.
Thanks for working on this. The $() form is less error-prone
than ``, so in that sense it can
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
If the script is obviously correct enough then there is no need
to manually go through 140 files after that point.
The script cannot be obviously correct, as there are a lot of
potential corner-cases (nested `, nesting ` within , comments, ...).
If
Matthieu Moy wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
If the script is obviously correct enough then there is no need
to manually go through 140 files after that point.
The script cannot be obviously correct, as there are a lot of
potential corner-cases (nested `, nesting ` within
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
+extern
+struct combine_diff_path *diff_tree_paths(
These two on the same line, please.
+ struct combine_diff_path *p, const unsigned char *sha1,
+ const unsigned char **parent_sha1, int nparent,
+ struct strbuf *base, struct
Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com writes:
W dniu 2014-04-03 23:44, Junio C Hamano pisze:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
With that approach you depend on the hunk header and apparently need
to add XDL_EMIT_MOREFUNCNAMES and XDL_EMIT_MOREHUNKHEADS to improve
the results. This approach feels
Marat Radchenko ma...@slonopotamus.org writes:
Drop NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER from config.mak.uname for the MSVC platform.
MakeMaker is available on Windows Perl implementations and
installs modules to correct location, unlike NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Marat Radchenko
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
140 patches worth of churn once every couple of years is not terrible,
but I really don't want to see this becoming a pattern. :/
Likewise.
And I don't see how the upside in this example warrants it.
Paraphrasing
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
More topics merged to 'master', some of which are fallouts from GSoC
microprojects, some are updates to docs. C/C++ funcname pattern
update is
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:39:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
However, it's possible that the other side cannot read our
packfile verbatim. For example, we may have objects stored
as OFS_DELTA, but the client is an antique version of git
that only understands REF_DELTA. We negotiate
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating through each object
and examining the header. I think that's
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
The following features are planned but not yet implemented:
- add more tests related to commands
- add examples in documentation
- integration with git commit
I was planning to merge the series to 'next', but perhaps
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
...
Why support both '=' and ':'? Using just one would make it easier to
grep through scripts to see who is adding signoffs.
That was already discussed previously.
I do recall it was discussed
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:28:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating
17 matches
Mail list logo
