On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:14 AM, dtur...@twopensource.com wrote:
The most sigificant patch uses Facebook's watchman daemon[1] to monitor
the repository work tree for changes. This makes allows git status
to avoid traversing the entire work tree to find changes.
Some comments on this series. I
Hello,
when I’m using the HTTPS protocol to access repositories, a window
from /usr/bin/qt4-ssh-askpass comes up. It asks for my “SSH pass
phrase”, twice. Sadly, it’s wrong. The actual things it wants is the
username in the first case, and the password used to access the remote
repository (eg.
Felipe Contreras wrote:
== git update ==
Another proposed solution is to have a new command: `git update`. This
command would be similar to `git pull --ff-only` by default, but it
could be configured to do merges instead, and when doing so in reverse.
And here it is:
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
when I’m using the HTTPS protocol to access repositories, a window
from /usr/bin/qt4-ssh-askpass comes up. It asks for my “SSH pass
phrase”, twice. Sadly, it’s wrong. The actual things it wants is the
username in the first case, and the password used to
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
produce boundary
Hi,
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push user@host:repo1 --look-for-objects-in=repo2
I'm aware of the alternates mechanism,
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I'd actually be inclined to say the opposite of what Junio is saying
there: that -b should blank the author field as well as the commit
sha1. I'd even go so far as to say that -b should probably
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:08:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
3. Just disable the http tests when run as root.
I think I'd favor 3. But I'd like to be sure that being root is the
problem.
I agree with both the conclusion and the precondition.
Here's the patch.
The problem starts
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:09:37PM +0530, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
Hi,
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push
On 17:23 Sat 10 May , brian m. carlson wrote:
I don't believe this is possible. There has been some discussion on
related matters at least fairly recently, though.
Part of the reason nobody has implemented this is because it exposes
additional security concerns. If I create a commit
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 12:26 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:14 AM, dtur...@twopensource.com wrote:
The most sigificant patch uses Facebook's watchman daemon[1] to monitor
the repository work tree for changes. This makes allows git status
to avoid traversing the entire
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:32:26AM -0700, milki wrote:
On 17:23 Sat 10 May , brian m. carlson wrote:
I don't believe this is possible. There has been some discussion on
related matters at least fairly recently, though.
Part of the reason nobody has implemented this is because it
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:21:33PM +0200, Ivo Bellin Salarin wrote:
Well, I'm on Windows.
using `git version 1.9.2.msysgit.0`.
You can find all the exchanges, recorded with wireshark, of the
following usecases:
* git vanilla (not working),
* VisualStudio2013 with libgit (working)
* curl
Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push user@host:repo1
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:38 AM, David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com wrote:
I got warning: Watchman watch error: Got bad JSON from watchman
get-sockname: '[' or '{' expected near end of file. Any ideas what I
did wrong? I'm using watchman.git and libwatchman.git. check-0.9.11
and jansson-2.4
On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git
On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: That's an interesting
thread and it's recent too. However, it's about clone (though the
intro email mentions other commands also).
I'm specifically interested in push efficiency right now. When you
On 05/11/2014 07:04 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: That's an interesting
thread and it's recent too. However, it's about clone (though the
intro email mentions other commands also).
I'm specifically
On 5/10/2014 9:10 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
On 05/11/2014 07:04 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: Many of the Git repo
managers will neatly set up a server-side repo clone for you, with
alternates into the original repo saving both network and disk
On 05/11/2014 08:41 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
On 5/10/2014 9:10 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
1. Clone remote repo
2. Hack hack hack
3. Fork repo on server
4. Push changes to your own remote repo
is equally efficient.
Your suggestions are good for a manual setup where
21 matches
Mail list logo
