Hello,
I have completed the micro project[1] and have also been working on
adding a --literally option
for cat-file[2]. I have left out the personal information part of the
proposal here, will fill that in while submitting my final proposal.
Currently, I have been reading about how branch -l,
If I push straight to the other repo, it only pushes the 3 objects I'd
expect (instead of 10,000+). So it looks like that is the problem, but
I don't really understand why.
From my point of view, there should be no difference, but I clearly
don't understand how it actually works. How does git
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. I'm using a private fork of a repo, I pull from one and push to
the other, e.g.
git fetch foo
git rebase foo/master
git push --set-upstream origin bar
It's quite possible my workflow is causing the problem, but
I inserted a size variable of int type and calculated size in each
cases of print_commit(). The function is
static void print_commit(git_commit *commit)
{
char buf[GIT_OID_HEXSZ + 1];
int i, count;
const git_signature *sig;
const char *scan, *eol;
int size=0;
Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 20.03.2015 21:13:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:02:39PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Yeah, that was my impression, too. I don't have svn installed on my
system, so I missed those ones. I don't have CVS either. That might be
worth following up on.
Hmm, that turned out
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud marcn...@xiplink.com
---
I did a bit of googling but couldn't find some standard that says the
application name goes at the end of the title bar. But this is how all the
browsers and other apps I use regularly do things.
M.
gitk | 2 +-
1 file
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud marcn...@xiplink.com
---
I often open multiple gitk windows in the same working directory to examine
other branches or refs in the repo. This change allows me to distinguish
which window is showing what.
M.
gitk | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6
For those curious, the source of the broken behavior is npm's
completion script. It is modifying COMP_WORDBREAKS. There are two open
issues against npm for this bug.
https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/4530
https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/5820
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:06 AM, SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de wrote:
Hi,
Quoting Jason Karns karns...@gmail.com:
There appears to be a bug in the bash completion for git-branch when
attempting to complete the remote ref argument for --set-upstream-to=
When:
$ git branch
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 20.03.2015 23:38:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
Thomas referencing reading the man page offline, made me wonder
why you wouldn't read the man pages itself as they can also be
carried around offline. But the striking point is on an iPad, which
Add $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials to the default credential search
path of git-credential-store. This allows git-credential-store to
support user-specific configuration files in accordance with the XDG
base directory specification[1].
[1]
t0302 now tests git-credential-store's support for the XDG user-specific
configuration file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials. Specifically:
* Ensure that the XDG file is strictly opt-in. It should not be created
by git at all times if it does not exist.
* Conversely, if the XDG file exists,
Previously, git-credential-store only supported storing credentials in a
single file: ~/.git-credentials. In order to support the XDG base
directory specification[1], git-credential-store needs to be able to
lookup and erase credentials from multiple files, as well as to pick the
appropriate file
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Ah, wait.
I suspect that it all cancels out.
...
OK, so I think I can see how the result could work without
invalidating the cache-tree entry that contains i-t-a entries.
It might be even the right thing to do in general. We can view that
Hi guys,
git goes into an infinite loop due to broken symlink (minimal reproducer
[0]). Affected code is in function
resolve_ref_unsafe in file refs.c - notice 'stat_ref'. There is comment
about problem with race condition, hovewer in that case it's regular broken
symlink which cause infinite
Junio C Hamano:
An open source hosting site can help better by checking at the
project creation time, because the people who interact with that
interface are solely in the position to set and publish licensing terms.
That doesn't help with the many projects that have *already* been
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
`old` is not used outside the loop and would get lost
once we reach the goto.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com wrote:
The updated patch with the additional fix is below.
Thanks, signed-off and pushed to master on git://bogomips.org/git-svn
I've dropped my destroy all tempfiles...
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Correct, it's a good time to pull and I don't expect to have more time
to work on new features (lazy load) for a bit. I was under the
impression you already pulled:
http://mid.gmane.org/xmqq61aol44q@gitster.dls.corp.google.com
Indeed I did. I
I see you queued several patches and pushed out the following on the
'master' branch in your git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk.git repository:
c846920 gitk: Update .po files
f7fa39b gitk: l10n: Add Catalan translation
66e3f01 gitk: Fix typo in Russian translation
8a1692f gitk: Remove
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Kyle J. McKay mack...@gmail.com wrote:
The updated patch with the additional fix is below.
Thanks, signed-off and pushed to master on git://bogomips.org/git-svn
I've dropped my destroy all tempfiles... patch.
I think I missed this exchange. I see
Am 20.03.2015 um 01:13 schrieb Trevor Saunders:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Trevor Saunders tbsau...@tbsaunde.org writes:
I have a feeling that an optional feature that allows git submodule
update to happen automatically from this codepath might be
acceptable
Shanti Swarup Tunga b112...@iiit-bh.ac.in writes:
hey
I am Shanti Swarup Tunga . I want to know is there any proposal
format for Git .If not what should we focus in the proposal .
You probably already found http://git.github.io/SoC-2015-Ideas.html
There's no particular requirement on
Hi Paul,
On 2015-03-22 18:39, Paul Tan wrote:
The code coverage tools can help here as well. The kcov output clearly
shows which options of git-pull are currently not being tested. But
yes, I agree that the test suite shouldn't be relied too much on
compared to code inspection and review.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
So it didn't take too long to convince me after all :)
Here comes Junio's version, preceded by a cleanup of the color
setting and resetting for decorations.
Junio C Hamano (1):
log: decorate HEAD with
Hmm. I'm using a private fork of a repo, I pull from one and push to
the other, e.g.
git fetch foo
git rebase foo/master
git push --set-upstream origin bar
It's quite possible my workflow is causing the problem, but I'm not
sure what I could do differently. What do you mean by a no-share
remote?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
Try fast-export --anonymize as that would help us understand this.
Attached.
The bad news is it seems to be working for me (I recreated the remote
repo from this dump). I notice that you have two remotes, one shares
many
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com wrote:
I see git already has gcov support. For shell scripts, maybe kcov[1]
could be used. With some slight code changes, I managed to generate a
report for the git-pull tests[2] which should at least provide a good
starting point
hey
I am Shanti Swarup Tunga . I want to know is there any proposal
format for Git .If not what should we focus in the proposal .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Fri, Mar 20, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de writes:
What does it take to send the cover letter to all people which are
listed in the Cc: list of the following patches? Each patch has a
different Cc: list. The git send-email --help command suggests that
this cmdline
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:46 PM, David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote:
Junio C Hamano:
An approach that checks only the top-level directory for fixed
filename pattern would not be an effective way to protect the
cloners, either.
I disagree, I think it's remarkably effective.
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
This cycle is turning out to be a shoot for product excellence
release. About half of the commits that have been merged to the
'master' so far
The latest maintenance release Git v2.3.4 is now available at the
usual places. It is comprised of 22 non-merge commits since v2.3.3,
contributed by 9 people, 1 of which is a new face. All these fixes
have already been in the 'master' branch for some time.
The tarballs are found at:
Am 17.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Patrick Steinhardt:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(+cc: Jens and Heiko, submodule experts)
Hi,
Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
This proposal is just for discussion. If there is any interest I
will implement the feature and send some
[jc: I usually do this at the major release, but because we are
seeing many new folks due to GSoC, and also the newsletter is
getting closer to reality, so here is a special edition.]
Welcome to the Git development community.
This message is written by the maintainer and talks about how Git
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
By the way, aren't the following also leaking here?
- the strbuf newlines that starts out as size
- line[] arrays of preimage and postimage
yes :(
I think a viable replacement may be below.
That way the returned value of the function is
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
By the way, aren't the following also leaking here?
- the strbuf newlines that starts out as size
- line[] arrays of preimage and postimage
yes :(
I think a viable replacement may be below.
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
... though I do not understand
why. This passes the test suite, so I wonder if this patch would be a subtle
bug
now.
I recall the last time I traced the code I noticed that the ce can
get passed to a codepath that causes its removal from
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
`ce` is allocated in make_cache_entry and should be freed if it is not
used any more. refresh_cache_entry as a wrapper around refresh_cache_ent
will either return `ce` or a new
`ce` is allocated in make_cache_entry and should be freed if it is not
used any more. refresh_cache_entry as a wrapper around refresh_cache_ent
will either return `ce` or a new updated cache entry which is allocated
to new memory. In that case we need to free `ce` ourselfs.
Helped-by: Junio C
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
I have reread your remarks from the weekend, and I agree
this looks more intuitive. Thanks for pointing out the subtle details
to make programming an art!
Heh, Our mails crossed, I guess. I've
Hi all,
I have attempted a microproject [1][2] and this is my first draft of
the proposal.I have included only the matter regarding my approach
to solving the problem and shall add my personal details later.
Please be kind enough to go through my proposal and suggest modifications
or detailing
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
`ce` is allocated in make_cache_entry and should be freed if it is not
used any more. refresh_cache_entry as a wrapper around refresh_cache_ent
will either return `ce` or a new updated cache entry which is allocated
to new memory. In that case we need
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
I have reread your remarks from the weekend, and I agree
this looks more intuitive. Thanks for pointing out the subtle details
to make programming an art!
read-cache.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Ah, wait.
I suspect that it all cancels out.
...
Now, as you mentioned, there _may_ be codepaths that uses the same
definition of what's in the index as what diff-cache used to
On Tue, Mar 17 2015 at 06:16:38 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I also notice that handle_revision_arg() would die() by calling it
directly or indirectly via verify_non_filename(), etc., but the
caller actually is expecting it to silently return non-zero when it
finds an argument
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 AM, mdc...@seznam.cz wrote:
I am trying to setup my git ignore (resp. .git/info/exclude) so that I
exclude
all directories and files except the content of directories that I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote:
Hi, I was expecting that sparse checkout could be used to avoid the checking
out, by git, of files which have colons in their name into the worktree when
on Windows.
Yue Lin Ho reported on the Msygit list [1] that he
At the first look, a user may think the default version is 23. Even
with UNIX background, there's no reference anywhere close that may
indicate this is glob or regex.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/git.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Why does gitk -g master not work? I would expect gitk to load up the
master branch reflog and show each of the previous heads that master
has transitioned through, but it doesn't. Instead I have to run gitk
master@{1} master@{2}, etc, and then,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 AM, mdc...@seznam.cz wrote:
Any idea what I am doing wrong?
The fourth bullet point of the Pattern Format section
51 matches
Mail list logo
