On 2015-06-26 13:06, Ties wrote:
Do you have an ETA on the final release?
No, sorry, no ETA yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:34:19PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
Thanks. How did you find this (does the auto -chain test apply to
t/perf stuff as well)?
Apparently the -chain tests for it as I got a warning for it while
benchmarking some changes in ALLOC_GROW. (which originally
should
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
If we don't want to support positional arguments, then I would suggest
supporting
Hi Junio,
On 2015-06-26 19:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions that assume NUL-terminated strings with an
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
The function is called only from one place, which makes sure
to have `interesting_cache` not NULL. Additionally it is a
dereferenced a few lines before unconditionally, which would
result in a segmentation fault.
Yeah, I think
Hi,
Git v2.5.0-rc0 has been released, and it's time to start new round of git l10n.
This time there are 65 updated messages need to be translated since last
update:
l10n: git.pot: v2.5.0 round 1 (65 new, 15 removed)
Generate po/git.pot from v2.5.0-rc0 for git v2.5.0 l10n round 1.
Hello All,
As part of GSoC I'm working on the Unification of 'for-each-ref', 'tag -l'
and 'branch -l'. Sorry for the lack of update since Jun 14, was a
little busy with an exam I had. Now thats over, I will be working more
on the project.
Current Progress:
1. Building ref-filter.{c,h} from
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
On 2015-06-26 19:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I understood what you were saying, but it still appears too fragile to
me to mix functions
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
If we don't want to support
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
This version addresses Junio's comments on v3.
The end result makes more sense than the previous one, but did you
screw up when rewriting and/or squashing patches around the new 4/6?
I think that one has two separate changes mixed into one and does
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
Add support for %(refname:lalignX) where X is a number.
This will print a shortened refname aligned to the left
followed by spaces for a total length of X characters.
If X is less than the shortened refname size, the
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, John Lee wrote:
On Sun, 31 May 2015, David Aguilar wrote:
Were you thinking of something like this, or something else?
Can you describe your use case a bit more?
I think now I should just publish my script and then it will be very clear
what I'm talking about. If
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
Add support for %(refname:lalignX) where X is a number.
This will print a shortened refname aligned to the left
followed by spaces for a total length of X characters.
If X is less than the shortened refname size, the
On 06/27/2015 06:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
If we don't want to support positional arguments, then I would suggest
supporting first the following instead:
git bisect terms --name-good=fast
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote:
Delete the duplicated GUID from the generation code for the Visual Studio
.sln project file.
The duplicate GUID tended to be allocated to test-svn-fe, which was then
ignored by Visual Studio / MSVC, and it's omission
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
+ if (starts_with(formatp, lalign)) {
+ const char *valp;
+
16 matches
Mail list logo
