On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
Don't worry too much about it. Consider it something to keep in mind for
future patches. I reviewed the change and it seemed okay. I mentioned it
because one of the goals of patch submission, in addition to making an
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:41:08AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
If conflicts arise and a strategy for automatically resolving
-conflicting notes (see the -s/--strategy option) is not given,
-the manual resolver is
From: Lars Schneider larsxschnei...@gmail.com
Hi,
I want to propose this patch as it helped us to migrate a big source code base
successfully from P4 to Git. I am sorry that I don't provide a test case, yet.
I would like to get advise on the patch and on the best strategy to provide a
test. Do
From: Lars Schneider larsxschnei...@gmail.com
PROBLEM:
We run P4 servers on Linux and P4 clients on Windows. For an unknown
reason the file path for a number of files in P4 does not match the
directory path with respect to case sensitivity.
E.g. `p4 files` might return
//depot/path/to/file1
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jan Viktorin vikto...@rehivetech.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 05:33:28 -0400 Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jan Viktorin
vikto...@rehivetech.com wrote:
At the very least, you will also want to update the
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Teach git-notes about a new configuration option notes.merge for
selecting the default notes merge strategy. Document the option in
config.txt and git-notes.txt
Add tests for use of the configuration option. Include a test to ensure
that --strategy
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
This series incorporates the feedback from both Johan and Eric. In
addition, I included an RFC implementing suggestion from Johan regarding
per-ref merge strategies.
I split the tests for --merge/--commit/--strategy out into their own
patch to help
2015-08-02 21:42 GMT+08:00 Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org:
Separate out the three different contribution styles for existing, new,
and wider mis-translation contributions, with suitable headings for easy
reference.
In particular highlight the appropriate action should a Git
When sending an e-mail, the client and server must
agree on an authentication mechanism. Some servers
(due to misconfiguration or a bug) deny valid
credentials for certain mechanisms. In this patch,
a new option --smtp-auth and configuration entry
smtpauth are introduced. If smtp_auth is defined,
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
What I was really asking was whether this sort of checking really
belongs in git-send-email or if it is better left to Net::SMTP (and
Authen::SASL) to do so since they are in better positions to know what
is valid and what is not. If the Perl
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Hmm, ok, so you are thinking of a remote database with high latency. I
was thinking more of something like LMDB, with latency comparable to
filesystem storage.
Not necessarily. The comment was more from conceptual point: Why
share what needs not
Jan Viktorin vikto...@rehivetech.com writes:
Authen::SASL gives:
No SASL mechanism found
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Authen/SASL.pm line 77.
at /usr/share/perl5/core_perl/Net/SMTP.pm line 207.
The SASL library does not check validity of mechanisms'
names (or I did not find it). It
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
+test_expect_success 'no padding when `padright` length is smaller than atom
length' '
+cat expect -\EOF
+refs/heads/master|
+refs/heads/side|
+refs/odd/spot|
+refs/tags/double-tag|
+refs/tags/four|
+refs/tags/one|
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Jan Viktorin vikto...@rehivetech.com wrote:
When sending an e-mail, the client and server must
agree on an authentication mechanism. Some servers
(due to misconfiguration or a bug) deny valid
credentials for certain mechanisms. In this patch,
a new option
Authen::SASL gives:
No SASL mechanism found
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Authen/SASL.pm line 77.
at /usr/share/perl5/core_perl/Net/SMTP.pm line 207.
The SASL library does not check validity of mechanisms'
names (or I did not find it). It just tries to load one
that matches both the ours and
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
Even more generic would be an %(ifeq:x:y) conditional and a
%(currentbranch) atom:
%(ifeq:refname:currentbranch)*%(endif)
Those are just a couple ideas. Other variations are possible and
likely preferable to the specialized %(starifcurrent).
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Good point! I just was wondering if we need another atom
On 07/24/2015 06:45 AM, David Turner wrote:
This series is another chunk of the pluggable refs backend work. The
major reason it is listed as PATCH/RFC is beacuse it breaks
t9300-fast-import.sh, because fast-import wants to create a ref called
TEMP_TAG, which would now be a pseudoref. The
Hi,
A draft of Git Rev News edition 6 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-6.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section, either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub issue:
Hi Thomas.
On 3 August 2015 at 08:52, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A draft of Git Rev News edition 6 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-6.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section, either by editing
On 06/14/2015 12:16 AM, brian m. carlson wrote:
This is another series of conversions to struct object_id.
This series converts more of the refs code and struct object to use
struct object_id. It introduces an additional helper function,
has_object_file, which is the equivalent of
Dear
Good day
Pocket size mini foldable monopod selfie stick with bt shutter button on stick,
now only $2.7/pc ,only from us,the arcpeaks factory,2kpcs in stock now
22 matches
Mail list logo
