On 21 December 2015 at 13:09, Romain Picard wrote:
> After changing the type of a file in the git repository, it is not possible to
> "git p4 publish" the commit to perforce. This is due to the fact that the git
> "T" status is not handled in git-p4.py. This can typically occur when
> replacing
>
git-scm comes with ca-bundle.trust.crt and cert.pem, it currently (2.6.4)
assumes that they are stored in
\mingw32\libexec\ssl\certs
\mingw32\libexec\ssl
which is not true, they are in
\mingw32\ssl\certs
\mingw32\ssl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailing list to ask this:
I have an existing git repo and I would like to make the repo available
through my web server so that remote users can clone/fetch the repo.
They don't need to commit.
So far, I've found some documentation basically telling me to create a
ba
> From Jo zeve
>
> git-scm comes with ca-bundle.trust.crt and cert.pem, it currently (2.6.4)
> assumes that they are stored in
>
> \mingw32\libexec\ssl\certs
> \mingw32\libexec\ssl
>
> which is not true, they are in
>
> \mingw32\ssl\certs
> \mingw32\ssl
>
The location of the CA certs is discu
Most of the updates are in commit message (see the old thread [1]). I
give up on adding new tests for git-apply, finally admitting I don't
know that command that well. Code change from 'pu' version is entirely
in 5/6:
diff --git a/builtin/checkout-index.c b/builtin/checkout-index.c
index 687c82e..
That "someday" in the comment happened two years later in
b65982b (Optimize "diff-index --cached" using cache-tree - 2009-05-20)
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/blame.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/blame.c b/builtin/blame.c
index 06484c2..9a0df9
Suppose that you came up with some contents to register at path F in
your working tree, told Git about your intention with "add -N F", and
then tried to apply a patch that wants to _create_ F:
Without this patch, we would say "F already exists so a patch to
create is incompatible with our current
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/rm.c | 2 +-
cache-tree.c | 2 +-
cache.h | 1 +
read-cache.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/rm.c b/builtin/rm.c
index 3304bff..74a7a43 100644
--- a/builtin/rm.c
+++ b/builtin/rm.c
@@ -212,7 +21
The test case probably describes the test scenario the best. We have a
patch to modify some file but the base file is gone. Because
check_preimage() finds an index entry with the same old_name, it tries
to restore the on-disk base file with cached content with
checkout_target() and move on.
If thi
The cached blob of i-t-a entries are empty blob. By checkout, we delete
the content we have. Don't do it.
This is done higher up instead of inside checkout_entry() because we
would have limited options in there: silently ignore, loudly ignore,
die. At higher level we can do better reporting. For e
The expression "!S_ISREG(ce)" covers i-t-a entries as well because
ce->ce_mode would be zero then. I could make a comment saying that, but
it's probably better just to comment with code, in case i-t-a entry
content changes in future.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/grep.c | 2 +-
Make sure "el" can be reuseable again. The problem was el->alloc is
not cleared and may cause segfaults next time because add_exclude()
thinks el->excludes (being NULL) has enough space. Just clear the
entire struct to be safe.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
This was needed in the workt
mutt saves aliases with escaped quotes in the form of:
alias dot \"Dot U. Sir\"
When we pass through our sanitize_address routine,
we end up with double-escaping:
To: "\\\"Dot U. Sir\\\"
Remove the escaping in mutt only for now, as I am not sure
if other mailers can do this o
New design. We now define multiworktree behavior with config var
extensions.worktree. Latest git must support all older behavior
versions. If config file says "version 1", even if latest version is
3, git must behave like version 1. This covers all aspects of
multi-worktree, not just config files.
Multiple worktree setup is still evolving and its behavior may be
changed in future. But we do not want to break existing worktree
setups. A new set of extensions, worktree=X, is recognized to tell Git
what multiple worktree "version" is being used so that Git can
behavior accordingly.
This extens
The first one must be per-worktree because info/sparse-checkout
already is. The second one shares the same nature and should also be
per-worktree.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt | 2 +-
core.worktree and core.bare, which are treated specially in 31e26eb [1],
are now defined per-worktree with repo extension worktree=1 and the
special treatment reverted. The test "$GIT_DIR/common overrides
core.worktree" in t1501 from 31e26eb verifies that the behavior is
still correct after this ch
In multiple worktree setup, a set of variables will be read from
$GIT_DIR/worktrees//config instead of $GIT_DIR/config, when the
config variables are accessed from a linked worktree. When accessed
from the main worktree, the same set is still read from $GIT_DIR/config.
This mechanism is needed bec
Repo ext worktree=1 provides a set of config vars that _must_ be
per-worktree. However, the user may want to make some more config vars
per-worktree, depending on their workflow.
include.path is extended to make this possible. If the given path is
in the form "$GIT_xyz/abc" then "$GIT_xyz" will be
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/worktree.c | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
index 475b958..2ec9c36 100644
--- a/builtin/worktree.c
+++ b/builtin/worktree.c
@@ -184,6 +184,37 @@ static con
The current update_linked_gitdir() has a bug that can create "gitdir"
file in non-multi-worktree setup. Instead of fixing this, we step back a
bit. The original design was probably not well thought out. For now, if
the user manually moves a worktree, they have to fix up "gitdir" file
manually or th
21 matches
Mail list logo