On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>
>>> * sb/submodule-clone-rr (2016-08-17) 8 commits
>>>
>>> I spotted a last-minute bug in v5, which is not a very good sign
>>> (it shows
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> What's the easiest way to find the most recent revision (of any file in
> the repository, including those that have been deleted in the current
> HEAD) that contains a given string?
I normally do something like:
git log -r --raw -p -SSTRING
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Richard wrote:
> I work on a git server called gitano.
> We've been using and recommending cgit for the web UI.
>
> I've been working on adding git namespace support to both,
> so that we can separate administrative branches from code branches.
>
>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 02:41:35PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What's the easiest way to find the most recent revision (of any file in
> the repository, including those that have been deleted in the current
> HEAD) that contains a given string?
>
> I was hoping that "git grep" would
From: "Zenaan Harkness"
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Zenaan Harkness"
>
> Please CC me :)
> or perhaps something like:
> "does not unstage a file, it actually stages the removal of the
> file(s) from the repo
Currently, if you have a branch "somebranch" that contains a gitlink
"somecommit", you can write "somebranch:somecommit" to refer to the
commit, just like a tree or blob. ("man git-rev-parse" defines this
syntax in the "SPECIFYING REVISIONS" section.) You can use this
anywhere you can use a
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Zenaan Harkness"
> >
> > Please CC me :)
> > or perhaps something like:
> > "does not unstage a file, it actually stages the removal of the
> > file(s) from the repo (assuming it was already committed
Hello,
What's the easiest way to find the most recent revision (of any file in
the repository, including those that have been deleted in the current
HEAD) that contains a given string?
I was hoping that "git grep" would do this (like in Mercurial), but as
far as I can tell it only greps through
Jakub Narębski wrote:
> Other version control systems
>
> 20. What other version control systems (SCM) do you use beside Git?
>(multiple choice, with other)
>
> Explanation: "using" version control system here means using
> it to actively contribute (propose changes
W dniu 19.08.2016 o 15:54, Jeff King pisze:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:40:59PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Ping..
>
> There was some discussion after v4. I think the open issues are:
>
> - the commit message is rather terse (it should describe motivation,
> and can refer to the docs
W dniu 19.08.2016 o 17:03, Jeff King pisze:
[...]
> There is nothing wrong with building tooling around your workflow. If we
> had a GitHub-based workflow, I'd build tooling around that, too. One of
> the things I _like_ about a mail-based workflow is how easy it is to
> build that tooling, and
From: "Zenaan Harkness"
Please CC me :)
From man git-rm:
--cached
Use this option to unstage and remove paths only from the index.
Working tree files, whether modified or not, will be left alone.
This wording is unclear and dangerous, and ought be cleaned up somehow.
I work on a git server called gitano.
We've been using and recommending cgit for the web UI.
I've been working on adding git namespace support to both,
so that we can separate administrative branches from code branches.
Because git is not namespace aware for anything but git-upload-pack
and
Hello,
As I wrote previously here, I am thinking about returning to doing the
Git User's Survey this year.
Message-ID: <577e6f32.7020...@gmail.com>
https://marc.info/?l=git=146790381602547=2
https://public-inbox.org/git/577E6F32.7020007%40gmail.com/
The previous email, which did not
On samedi 20 août 2016 11:03:00 CEST Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jean-Noël AVILA writes:
> > 1. In config.c, the changes to the function die_bad_number tried to
> > flatten the translated strings (no message building logic). I think it
> > went too far, and the reason of the
"--force" have currently two shortcuts: "-f" and "+", hence more ergonomic.
But I expect it's better for users to use "--force-with-lease" by
default for overriding
remote branches (e.g. cleaning up a pull request), as it rarely fails in
normal situations.
I propose adding some shortcut for
Jean-Noël AVILA writes:
> 1. In config.c, the changes to the function die_bad_number tried to flatten
> the
> translated strings (no message building logic). I think it went too far, and
> the reason of the failure can be factorized so that we don't have to
> retranslate
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> From man git-rm:
>
> --cached
> Use this option to unstage and remove paths only from the index.
> Working tree files, whether modified or not, will be left alone.
>
> This wording is unclear and dangerous, and ought be cleaned up somehow.
I
Hi all,
Before anyone tries to localize this round, I'd like to make some preliminary
comments:
1. In config.c, the changes to the function die_bad_number tried to flatten
the
translated strings (no message building logic). I think it went too far, and
the reason of the failure can be
Please CC me :)
>From man git-rm:
--cached
Use this option to unstage and remove paths only from the index.
Working tree files, whether modified or not, will be left alone.
This wording is unclear and dangerous, and ought be cleaned up somehow.
Probably also the option name should
Please CC me :)
> From man git-rm:
>
> --cached
> Use this option to unstage and remove paths only from the index.
> Working tree files, whether modified or not, will be left alone.
>
>
> This wording is unclear and dangerous, and ought be cleaned up somehow.
>
> Probably also the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jacob Keller
> wrote:
>> - strbuf_git_path(buf, "%s/%s", "modules", path);
>> + /*
>> +* Lookup the submodule name
22 matches
Mail list logo