Re: Allow "git shortlog" to group by committer information

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:29:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > In some situations you may want to group the commits not by author, > > but by committer instead. > > > > For example, when I just wanted to look up what I'm still missi

Re: Allow "git shortlog" to group by committer information

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 08:39:40AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > I'm OK with the approach your patch takes, but I think there were some > unresolved issues: > > - are we OK taking the short "-c" for this, or do we want > "--group-by=committer" or something like it? > > - no tests; you can st

Re: Is there a way to have local changes in a branch 'bake' while working in different branches?

2016-12-16 Thread John Keeping
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:14:58PM +, Larry Minton wrote: > My question: > > Let's say I have a code change that I want to 'bake' for a while > locally, just to make sure some edge case doesn't pop up while I am > working on other things.  Is there any practical way of doing that? I > could c

Races on ref .lock files?

2016-12-16 Thread Andreas Krey
Hi all, We're occasionally seeing a lot of error: cannot lock ref 'stash-refs/pull-requests/18978/to': Unable to create '/opt/apps//repositories/68/stash-refs/pull-requests/18978/to.lock': File exists. from the server side with fetches as well as pushes. (Bitbucket server.) What I find

Re: Races on ref .lock files?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Andreas Krey writes: > We're occasionally seeing a lot of > > error: cannot lock ref 'stash-refs/pull-requests/18978/to': Unable to > create > '/opt/apps//repositories/68/stash-refs/pull-requests/18978/to.lock': File > exists. > > from the server side with fetches as well as pushes. (Bi

Re: Allow "git shortlog" to group by committer information

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > It obviously would need updating if we switch away from "-c", but I > think I am OK with the short "-c" (even if we add a more exotic grouping > option later, this can remain as a short synonym). Yeah, I think it probably is OK. As it is very clear that "group by author" i

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: intercept isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it

2016-12-16 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 11.12.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: When Git's source code calls isatty(), it really asks whether the respective file descriptor is connected to an interactive terminal. Windows' _isatty() function, however, determines whether the file descriptor is associated with a character de

Re: [PATCH] README: replace gmane link with public-inbox

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Eric Wong writes: > Jeff King wrote: > ... >> Yes, the status of gmane was up in the air for a while, but I think we >> can give it up as dead now (at least for our purposes). > > s/http/nntp/ still works for gmane. > ... >> -- >8 -- >> Subject: README: replace gmane link with public-inbox > ...

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Jeff King writes: > >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:37:28PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: >> >>> But if this case really is just "if (from_stdin)" that's quite easy, >>> too. >> >> So here is that patch (with some associated refactoring and cleanups). >> This is conceptually ind

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:37:28PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> But if this case really is just "if (from_stdin)" that's quite easy, >> too. > > So here is that patch (with some associated refactoring and cleanups). > This is conceptually independent of > jk/no-looking-at-dot

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Jeff King writes: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:37:28PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: >>> But if this case really is just "if (from_stdin)" that's quite easy, too. >>> >>> So here is that patch (with some associated refactoring and cl

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: intercept isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 11.12.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: >> When Git's source code calls isatty(), it really asks whether the >> respective file descriptor is connected to an interactive terminal. >> ... >> +if (!GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo(handle, &dummy)) >

Segfault in git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently with direct_io in FUSE filesystem

2016-12-16 Thread Josh Bleecher Snyder
I am using git with a simple in-memory FUSE filesystem. When I enable direct_io, I get a segfault from git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently during git clone. I have full reproduction instructions using Go and macOS at https://github.com/josharian/gitbug. It also includes a stack trace in case an

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Makefile: suppress some cppcheck false-positives

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Chris Packham writes: > -CPPCHECK_FLAGS = --force --quiet --inline-suppr $(if > $(CPPCHECK_ADD),--enable=$(CPPCHECK_ADD)) > +CPPCHECK_SUPP = --suppressions-list=nedmalloc.supp \ > + --suppressions-list=regcomp.supp > + > +CPPCHECK_FLAGS = --force --quiet --inline-suppr \ > + $(if $(CPPCH

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: intercept isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it

2016-12-16 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Junio C Hamano: Sorry for not having waited for you to chime in before agreeing to fast-track this one, and now this is in 'master'. No reason to be sorry, things happen... Dscho's request for fast-tracking was very reasonable, and the patch looked "obviously co

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Jeff King writes: > ... >> I'm actually wondering if the way it calls die() in 'next' is a pretty >> reasonable way for things to work in general. It happens when we lazily >> try to ask for the repository directory. So we don't have to replicate >> logic to say "are we

Re: [PATCH v15 08/27] bisect--helper: `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in C

2016-12-16 Thread Pranit Bauva
Hey Stephan, On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote: >> I don't understand why the return value is int and not void. To avoid a >> "return 0;" line when calling this function? > > Initially I thought I would be using the return value but now I > realize that it is meaningless to do s

[PATCH v7 2/7] submodules: add helper to determine if a submodule is initialized

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Add the `is_submodule_initialized()` helper function to submodules.c. `is_submodule_initialized()` performs a check to determine if the submodule at the given path has been initialized. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams --- submodule.c | 23 +++ submodule.h | 1 + 2 files chan

[PATCH v7 0/7] recursively grep across submodules

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Changes in v7: * Rebased on 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir' in order to fix the race condition that occurs when verifying a submodule's gitdir. * Reverted is_submodule_populated() to use resolve_gitdir() now that there is no race condition. * Added !MINGW to a test in t7814 so that it won't run o

[PATCH v7 3/7] submodules: load gitmodules file from commit sha1

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
teach submodules to load a '.gitmodules' file from a commit sha1. This enables the population of the submodule_cache to be based on the state of the '.gitmodules' file from a particular commit. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams --- cache.h| 2 ++ config.c | 8 sub

[PATCH v7 5/7] grep: optionally recurse into submodules

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Allow grep to recognize submodules and recursively search for patterns in each submodule. This is done by forking off a process to recursively call grep on each submodule. The top level --super-prefix option is used to pass a path to the submodule which can in turn be used to prepend to output or

[PATCH v7 4/7] grep: add submodules as a grep source type

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Add `GREP_SOURCE_SUBMODULE` as a grep_source type and cases for this new type in the various switch statements in grep.c. When initializing a grep_source with type `GREP_SOURCE_SUBMODULE` the identifier can either be NULL (to indicate that the working tree will be used) or a SHA1 (the REV of the s

[PATCH v7 6/7] grep: enable recurse-submodules to work on objects

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Teach grep to recursively search in submodules when provided with a object. This allows grep to search a submodule based on the state of the submodule that is present in a commit of the super project. When grep is provided with a object, the name of the object is prefixed to all output. In orde

[PATCH v7 7/7] grep: search history of moved submodules

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
If a submodule was renamed at any point since it's inception then if you were to try and grep on a commit prior to the submodule being moved, you wouldn't be able to find a working directory for the submodule since the path in the past is different from the current path. This patch teaches grep to

[PATCH v7 1/7] submodules: add helper to determine if a submodule is populated

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Williams
Add the `is_submodule_populated()` helper function to submodules.c. `is_submodule_populated()` performes a check to see if a submodule has been checkout out (and has a valid .git directory/file) at the given path. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams --- submodule.c | 15 +++ submodule.h

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: intercept isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 16.12.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Sorry for not having waited for you to chime in before agreeing to >> fast-track this one, and now this is in 'master'. > > No reason to be sorry, things happen... Dscho's request for > fast-tracking was very reasonable, an

Re: [PATCH v2 14/34] sequencer (rebase -i): update refs after a successful rebase

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > An interactive rebase operates on a detached HEAD (to keep the reflog > of the original branch relatively clean), and updates the branch only > at the end. > > Now that the sequencer learns to perform interactive rebases, it also > needs to learn the trick to update

Re: [PATCH v2 15/34] sequencer (rebase -i): leave a patch upon error

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > When doing an interactive rebase, we want to leave a 'patch' file for > further inspection by the user (even if we never tried to actually apply > that patch, since we're cherry-picking instead). > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > --- Yup. The other day, I

Re: [PATCH v2 11/34] sequencer (rebase -i): remove CHERRY_PICK_HEAD when no longer needed

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > The scripted version of the interactive rebase already does that. Sensible. I was wondering why this wasn't there while reviewing 10/34, comparing the two (this is not a suggestion to squash this into the previous step). > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > -

Re: [PATCH v2 18/34] sequencer (rebase -i): refactor setting the reflog message

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > This makes the code DRYer, with the obvious benefit that we can enhance > the code further in a single place. > > We can also reuse the functionality elsewhere by calling this new > function. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > --- > sequencer.c | 33 +

Re: [PATCH v15 08/27] bisect--helper: `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in C

2016-12-16 Thread Pranit Bauva
Hey Stephan, On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Stephan Beyer wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/14/2016 04:14 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote: >> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c >> index d84ba86..c542e8b 100644 >> --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c >> +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c >> @@ -

Re: [PATCH v2 20/34] sequencer (rebase -i): copy commit notes at end

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > +static void flush_rewritten_pending(void) { > + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > + unsigned char newsha1[20]; > + FILE *out; > + > + if (strbuf_read_file(&buf, rebase_path_rewritten_pending(), 82) > 0 && > + !get_sha1("HEAD", ne

Hello

2016-12-16 Thread info
Hello, I'M Anessa female 25 years old single, I am contacting you because I will be relocating to your country. I will send you my photos soon as i hear from you and also tell you much about my self. Thanks. Sincerely yours Anessa.

test failure

2016-12-16 Thread Ramsay Jones
Hi Lars, For the last two days, I've noticed t0021.15 on the 'pu' branch has been failing intermittently (well it fails with: 'make test >ptest-out', but when run by hand, it fails only say 1-in-6, 1-in-18, etc.). [yes, it's a bit strange; this hasn't changed in a couple of weeks!] I don't have

"disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread David Turner
I'm a bit confused by the message "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed". I see it the my gc.log file on my git server. 1. Its presence in the gc.log file prevents future automatic garbage collection. This seems bad. I understand the desire to avoid making things worse

Hello

2016-12-16 Thread info
Hello, I'M Anessa female 25 years old single, I am contacting you because I will be relocating to your country. I will send you my photos soon as i hear from you and also tell you much about my self. Thanks. Sincerely yours Anessa.

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:05:31PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > 1. Its presence in the gc.log file prevents future automatic garbage > collection. This seems bad. I understand the desire to avoid making > things worse if a past gc has run into issues. But this warning is > non-fatal; the only c

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > I'm a bit confused by the message "disabling bitmap writing, as some > objects are not being packed". I see it the my gc.log file on my git > server. > 1. Its presence in the gc.log file prevents future automatic garbage > collection. This seems bad. I understand the de

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:28:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > 2. I don't understand what would cause that message. That is, what bad > > thing am I doing that I should stop doing? I've briefly skimmed the > > code and commit message, but the answer isn't leaping out at me. > > Enabling bi

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread David Turner
On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 16:32 -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:28:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > 2. I don't understand what would cause that message. That is, what bad > > > thing am I doing that I should stop doing? I've briefly skimmed the > > > code and commit mes

Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] recursively grep across submodules

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Brandon Williams writes: > Changes in v7: > * Rebased on 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir' in order to fix the race condition > that occurs when verifying a submodule's gitdir. > * Reverted is_submodule_populated() to use resolve_gitdir() now that there is > no race condition. > * Added !MINGW to

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:01:49AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I think 2/3 is a good change to ensure we get a reasonable error for > >> "index-pack --stdin", and 3/3 is a very good cleanup. Both of them > >> of course are enabled by 1/3. > >> > >> We still fail "nongit git index-pack tmp.p

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:54:13AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I am tempted to suggest an intermediate step that comes before > b1ef400eec ("setup_git_env: avoid blind fall-back to ".git"", > 2016-10-20), which is the attached, and publish that as part of an > official release. That way, we'll

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:40:16PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > I would assume, based on the documentation, that auto gc would be doing > an all-into-one repack: > "If the number of packs exceeds the value of gc.autopacklimit, then > existing packs (except those marked with a .keep file) are > c

Re: index-pack outside of repository?

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > Ah, I only checked that it did not do anything terrible like write into > ".git". But it looks like it still looks at the git_dir value as part of > the collision check. > > Here's a patch, on top of the rest of the series. Thanks for a quick turnaround, as always. > -- >8 -

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Makefile: suppress some cppcheck false-positives

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:43:48AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > diff --git a/nedmalloc.supp b/nedmalloc.supp > [...] > > diff --git a/regcomp.supp b/regcomp.supp > > Yuck for both files for multiple reasons. > > I do not think it is a good idea to allow these files to clutter the > top-level

Re: Races on ref .lock files?

2016-12-16 Thread Bryan Turner
Andreas, Bitbucket Server developer here. Typically these errors on your client are indicative of git gc --auto being triggered by git-receive-pack on the server. Auto GC directly attached to a push in a repository with pull requests often fails due to concurrent ref updates linked to background p

What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2016, #04; Fri, 16)

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. You can find the changes described

[PATCH] pack-objects: don't warn about bitmaps on incremental pack

2016-12-16 Thread David Turner
When running git pack-objects --incremental, we do not expect to be able to write a bitmap; it is very likely that objects in the new pack will have references to objects outside of the pack. So we don't need to warn the user about it. This warning was making its way into gc.log because auto-gc w

indent-heuristic, compaction-heuristic combination

2016-12-16 Thread Norbert Kiesel
Hi, I started using compaction-heuristic with 2.9, and then also (or so I thought) enabled indent-heuristic with 2.11. Only after reading a comment in "Git rev news" I realized that these 2 options are mutually exclusive. I then checked the Git source code and saw that Git first checks the new in

Re: indent-heuristic, compaction-heuristic combination

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Norbert Kiesel wrote: > Hi, > > I started using compaction-heuristic with 2.9, and then also (or so I > thought) enabled indent-heuristic with 2.11. > Only after reading a comment in "Git rev news" I realized that these 2 > options are mutually exclusive. I then >

Re: indent-heuristic, compaction-heuristic combination

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Norbert Kiesel wrote: > Hi, > > I started using compaction-heuristic with 2.9, and then also (or so I > thought) enabled indent-heuristic with 2.11. > Only after reading a comment in "Git rev news" I realized that these 2 > options are mutually exclusive. I then >

Re: indent-heuristic, compaction-heuristic combination

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Jacob Keller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Norbert Kiesel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started using compaction-heuristic with 2.9, and then also (or so I >> thought) enabled indent-heuristic with 2.11. >> Only after reading a comment in "Git rev news" I real

Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Fix multi-path changelist empty commits

2016-12-16 Thread Luke Diamand
On 15 December 2016 at 17:14, George Vanburgh wrote: > From: George Vanburgh > > When importing from multiple perforce paths - we may attempt to import a > changelist that contains files from two (or more) of these depot paths. > Currently, this results in multiple git commits - one containing

[PATCH] diff: prefer indent heuristic over compaction heuristic

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller The current configuration code for enabling experimental heuristics prefers the last-set heuristic in the configuration. However, it is not necessarily easy to see what order the configuration will be read. This means that it is possible for a user to have accidentally enabled

[PATCHv2] git-p4: avoid crash adding symlinked directory

2016-12-16 Thread Luke Diamand
When submitting to P4, if git-p4 came across a symlinked directory, then during the generation of the submit diff, it would try to open it as a normal file and fail. Spot symlinks (of any type) and output a description of the symlink instead. Add a test case. Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand --- gi

[PATCHv2] git-p4: handle symlinked directories

2016-12-16 Thread Luke Diamand
This is an updated version of my earlier git-p4 symlink fix. This one now treats addition of all symlinks in the same way, rather than displaying the target file if linking to a file, or just the link target name if it's a directory. That makes the git-p4 summary behave more like normal git comma

[PATCH v2 1/5] doc: add documentation for OPT_STRING_LIST

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Commit c8ba16391655 ("parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helper", 2011-06-09) added the OPT_STRING_LIST as a way to accumulate a repeated list of strings. However, this was not documented in the api-parse-options documentation. Add documentation now so that future developers ma

[PATCH v2 0/5] extend describe and name-rev pattern matching

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller This series adds support for extending describe and name-rev pattern matching to allow (a) taking multiple patterns and (b) negative patterns which discard instead of keep. These changes increase the flexibility of the describe mechanism so that searching for specific tag forma

[PATCH v2 2/5] name-rev: extend --refs to accept multiple patterns

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Teach git name-rev to take a string list of patterns from --refs instead of only a single pattern. The list of patterns will be matched inclusively, such that a ref only needs to match one pattern to be included. If a ref will only be excluded if it does not match any of the pa

[PATCH v2 3/5] name-rev: add support to discard refs by pattern match

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Extend name-rev further to support matching refs by adding `--discard` patterns. These patterns will limit the scope of refs by discarding any ref that matches at least one discard pattern. Checking the discard refs shall happen first, before checking the include --refs pattern

[PATCH v2 4/5] describe: teach --match to accept multiple patterns

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Teach `--match` to be accepted multiple times, accumulating a list of patterns to match into a string list. Each pattern is inclusive, such that a tag need only match one of the provided patterns to be considered for matching. This extension is useful as it enables more flexib

[PATCH v2 5/5] describe: teach describe negative pattern matches

2016-12-16 Thread Jacob Keller
From: Jacob Keller Teach git-describe the `--discard` option which will allow specifying a glob pattern of tags to ignore. This can be combined with the `--match` patterns to enable more flexibility in determining which tags to consider. For example, suppose you wish to find the first official r

Re: [PATCH] diff: prefer indent heuristic over compaction heuristic

2016-12-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jacob Keller writes: > From: Jacob Keller > > The current configuration code for enabling experimental heuristics > prefers the last-set heuristic in the configuration. However, it is not > necessarily easy to see what order the configuration will be read. This > means that it is possible for a

Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Fix multi-path changelist empty commits

2016-12-16 Thread George Vanburgh
On 17 December 2016 01:47:55 CET, Luke Diamand wrote: >On 15 December 2016 at 17:14, George Vanburgh >wrote: >> From: George Vanburgh >> >> When importing from multiple perforce paths - we may attempt to >import a changelist that contains files from two (or more) of these >depot paths. Current

Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: don't warn about bitmaps on incremental pack

2016-12-16 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:59:35PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > When running git pack-objects --incremental, we do not expect to be > able to write a bitmap; it is very likely that objects in the new pack > will have references to objects outside of the pack. So we don't need > to warn the user a

Re: [RFC/PATCHv2] Makefile: add cppcheck target

2016-12-16 Thread Chris Packham
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Lars Schneider wrote: > > On 14 Dec 2016, at 12:24, Jeff King wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:27:31PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > > Changes in v2: > > - only run over actual git source files. > > - omit any files in t/ > > > I actually wonder if FIND_SOURC

Re: "disabling bitmap writing, as some objects are not being packed"?

2016-12-16 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner writes: > >> I'm a bit confused by the message "disabling bitmap writing, as some >> objects are not being packed". I see it the my gc.log file on my git >> server. > >> 1. Its presence in the gc.log file prevents future autom

Re: [PATCH 1/2] alternates: accept double-quoted paths

2016-12-16 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Duy Nguyen writes: > >> At least attr has the same problem and is going the same direction >> [1]. Cool. (I actually thought the patch was in and evidence that this >> kind of backward compatibility breaking was ok, turns out the patch >> h