Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix the early config

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> + * When we are not about to create a repository ourselves (init or >> + * clone) and when no .git/ directory was set up yet (in which case >> + * git_config_with_options() would already have picked up the >> +

Re: RFC: Another proposed hash function transition plan

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > This document is still in flux but I thought it best to send it out > early to start getting feedback. This actually looks very reasonable if you can implement it cleanly enough. In many ways the "convert entirely to

Re: Transition plan for git to move to a new hash function

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:13:27PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > brian m. carlson writes ("Re: Transition plan for git to move to a new hash > function"): > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 01:00:01PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Objects of one hash may refer to objects named by a different hash > > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Remove outdated info in difftool manpage

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:28:36PM -0800, Denton Liu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi Denton (or should I address you as Liu?), > Denton is fine, thanks. > > > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Denton Liu wrote: > > > > > When difftool was rewritten in C,

Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux

On 04/03/2017 20:49, Vegard Nossum wrote: On 04/03/2017 19:08, Vegard Nossum wrote: On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote: Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue:

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] git diff --quiet exits with 1 on clean tree with CRLF conversions

Torsten Bögershausen writes: >>> enum safe_crlf crlf_warn = (safe_crlf == SAFE_CRLF_FAIL >>> ? SAFE_CRLF_WARN >>> : safe_crlf); >>> + if (size_only) >>> + crlf_warn =

Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux

On 04/03/2017 19:08, Vegard Nossum wrote: On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote: Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue: http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16850-1-allan.x.xav...@oracle.com/

[RFC 1/4] upload-file: Add upload-file command

The upload-file command allows a remote to request specific files by sha1. Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas --- .gitignore| 1 + Makefile | 2 ++ daemon.c | 6 + upload-file.c | 87 +++ 4 files changed, 96

[RFC 4/4] clone: Request on-demand shallow clones

Add the --on-demand option to git-clone, which, when used in combination with the existing shallow clone options, requests an on-demand shallow clone. An on-demand shallow clone contains all commits from all history, but the commits that would normally be omitted in the shallow clone do not have

[RFC 2/4] on-demand: Fetch missing files from remote

If an object (tree, blob, ...) is not found either in the packs or loose, check if it is available on-demand from the remote. Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas --- Makefile| 1 + cache.h | 3 +- on_demand.c | 157

[RFC 0/4] Shallow clones with on-demand fetch

Hello everyone, This is an RFC for an enhancement to shallow repositories to make them behave more like full clones. I was inspired a bit by Microsoft's announcement of their Git VFS. I saw that people have talked in the past about making git fetch objects from remotes as they are needed, and

[RFC 3/4] upload-pack: Send all commits if client requests on-demand

Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas --- builtin/pack-objects.c | 26 -- list-objects.c | 12 +++- list-objects.h | 13 - object.h | 1 + on_demand.c| 26 ++ on_demand.h

Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux

On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote: Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue: http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16850-1-allan.x.xav...@oracle.com/

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2017, #02; Fri, 3)

> On 04 Mar 2017, at 00:26, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-01-08) 1 commit > . convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol > > Ejected, as does not build when merged to 'pu'. I send v2 [1] where I tried to address the points in

Re: GSoC 2017

On 03/04, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/04, Valery Tolstov wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git. > > Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my > > microproject? > > Feel free to choose any microproject from the list. A good way to > start

Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux

> On 04 Mar 2017, at 05:11, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> I only recently started looking at Travis logs, so I cannot tell if >> it is just a usual flake (e.g. some builds a few days ago seems to >>

Re: [PATCH] http: inform about alternates-as-redirects behavior

On 04/03/17 03:13, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:35:04AM +, Eric Wong wrote: [snip] > > The warning itself: > >> +warning("alternate disabled by http.followRedirects!=true: %s", > > feels like it could use some whitespace around the "!=", but maybe > that's

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2017, #02; Fri, 3)

Hi Pranit, On 03/04/2017 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > -- > [Stalled] [...] > > * pb/bisect (2017-02-18) 28 commits > - fixup! bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` & bisect_voc shell function in C > - bisect--helper: remove the dequote in

Re: git init --separate-git-dir does not update symbolic .git links for submodules

Looking for microproject ideas for GSoC. Would this issue be suitable as the microproject? Thanks, Valery Tolstov

git init --separate-git-dir does not update symbolic .git links for submodules

Hi, clone or have a repository with submodules. Now issue "git init --separate-git-dir ../test" which moves the content of the .git direcotry to the ../test directory and replaces the .git directory with a .git file "link". However, for all submodules the .git-file is not updated and still

Re: GSoC 2017

Hi, On 03/04, Valery Tolstov wrote: > Hi. > > Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git. > Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my microproject? Feel free to choose any microproject from the list. A good way to start is to check whether other students already attempted the

GSoC 2017

Hi. Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git. Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my microproject? Thanks.

Re:GOOD DAY AND URGENT REPLY.

MY name is Mr. ahmed zongo i am working in ADB bank I have ($17.4million Dollars) to transfer to your country and if you are interested get back to me immediately for more details.and i we give 40% for you and 60% for me ok. Please note; reply me through this email (zongoahmed...@gmail.com),

Re: Delta compression not so effective

On 3/1/2017 18:43, Linus Torvalds wrote: So, this repo must be knocking several parts of Git's insides. I was curious about why it was so slow on the writing objects part, since the whole repo is on a 4x RAID 5, 7k spindels. Now, they are not SSDs sure, but the thing has ~400MB/s continuous

Re: [PATCH v2] http: inform about alternates-as-redirects behavior

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 08:36:45AM +, Eric Wong wrote: > I also think the security implications for relative alternates > on the same host would not matter, since the smart HTTP will > take them into account on the server side. It depends on the host whether all of the repos on it have the

[PATCH v2] http: inform about alternates-as-redirects behavior

Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 06:55:48AM +, Eric Wong wrote: > > Jeff King wrote: > > > The warning itself: > > > > > > > + warning("alternate disabled by > > > > http.followRedirects!=true: %s", > > > > > > feels like it could use