RE: [PATCH v2] doc: add triangular workflow

>>> +This workflow is commonly used on different platforms like BitBucket, >>> +GitHub or GitLab which provide a dedicated mechanism for requesting merges. >> >> As a user, I find it terribly frustrating when reading documentation >> telling me that "there's a dedicated mechanism" for something

RE: [PATCH v2] doc: add triangular workflow

>> + >> + >> +-- - >> +| UPSTREAM | maintainer | PUBLISH | >> +||- - - - - - - -| | >> +-- <- - >> + \

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation about triangular workflow

Daniel Bensoussan writes: >> +TRIANGULAR WORKFLOW >> +--- >> + >> +Introduction >> + >> + >> +In some projects, contributors cannot push directly to the project but >> +have to suggest their commits to the maintainer (e.g. pull

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation about triangular workflow

>On 17 November 2017 at 17:07, Daniel Bensoussan > wrote: >> +- If the maintainer accepts the changes, he merges them into the >> + **UPSTREAM** repository. >Personally, I would prefer "they" and "their" over "he" and "his". I'm >not sure how universal this