using --force-with-lease after git rebase

the integration branch? -alex related question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52823692/git-push-force-with-lease-vs-force/53042745#53042745 -- Alexander D. Mills ¡¡¡ New cell phone number: (415)730-1805 !!! alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/

bug with git merge-base

umber: (415)730-1805 !!! alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/

Re: Support JSON with --json flag and provide header files

s. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Alexander Mills wrote: > @git > > I hear there is a movement underway to have git support JSON for the > purposes of machine readable stdio. > > That is all good and well. I want to add to that request. Imagine a > software world were serializ

Support JSON with --json flag and provide header files

415)730-1805 !!! alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/

Re: concurrent access to multiple local git repos is error prone

To add something to the previous message, I have strong evidence that the problem occurs when *different* repos are accessed concurrency, not the same repo, as bizarre as that may be. -alex On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Alexander Mills wrote: > Hi Johnathan, > > Yeah this concurrenc

Re: concurrent access to multiple local git repos is error prone

version 2.17.1 cpu: x86_64 no commit associated with this build sizeof-long: 8 -alex On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Alexander Mills wrote: > >> Yeah in this case what appeared to be happening is that if `git status` was >> called concurrently, freque

Re: concurrent access to multiple local git repos is error prone

: > Alexander Mills wrote: > >> Yeah in this case what appeared to be happening is that if `git status` was >> called concurrently, frequently I wouldnt get any stdout.. > > Thanks for reporting. A few questions: > > What platform are you on? What version of Git are you

Re: concurrent access to multiple local git repos is error prone

Note, in my first paragraph, I should have said "If I have multiple local git repos, and I run `git status -v` on them *concurrently*"... -alex On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Alexander Mills wrote: > If I have multiple local git repos, and I run `git status -v` on them, > somet

concurrent access to multiple local git repos is error prone

to have to do this. -- Alexander D. Mills ¡¡¡ New cell phone number: (415)730-1805 !!! alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/

shortstat / stat / numstat for git log

. Mills ! New cell phone number: (415)766-8243 alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/

git-log bug: --grep and -number args are at odds

$ git log -50 ### I get 50 results $ git log -50 --grep="*" ### I get a lot more than 50... shouldn't `-50` minimize the results length to 50 or fewer? -alex -- Alexander D. Mills ! New cell phone number: (415)766-8243 alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexand

git bug - merging JS / Node.js code with "git merge --squash"

exander D. Mills (650)269-9502 alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/pub/alexander-mills/b/7a5/418/