Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

2013-08-14 Thread Andres Perera
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/14/2013 07:14 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes: # all reflog entries that are not on a branch, tag, or remote d1 = !gitk --date-order $(git log -g --pretty=%H) --not

Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

2013-08-14 Thread Andres Perera
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/14/2013 12:40 PM, Andres Perera wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/14/2013 07:14 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes

Re: [PATCH] pull: Allow pull to preserve merges when rebasing.

2013-08-11 Thread Andres Perera
hello, comments inline On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.com wrote: If a user is working on master, and has merged in their feature branch, but now has to git pull because master moved, with pull.rebase their feature branch will be flattened into master.

Re: [PATCH v4] gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given

2013-08-09 Thread Andres Perera
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote: This may happen when `git gc --auto` is run automatically, then the user, to avoid wait time, switches to a new terminal, keeps working and `git gc --auto` is started again because the first gc instance has not clean