On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> ---
> In this new version of patch, function print_status is introduced.
>
> The functions for_each_submodule_list and get_submodule_displaypath
> are found to be the same as those in the ported submodule subcommand
> foreach's patches.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>>
>>>>> My feeling exactly. Diagnosing and failing upfront say
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> Realistically I'm going to submit this patch, I'm not going to take
>> the much bigger project of refactoring the entire test suite so that
>> no test runs under N second, and of course any such refactori
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:24:17AM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
>> While looking at the recent .gitignore issue (the need to use `**`) I came
>> up against a comment in
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/cagz79kzqsaubfotjyqm+-+ljyyec2ykj5exuy5kderez
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>>> My feeling exactly. Diagnosing and failing upfront saying "well you
>>> made a copy but it is not suitable for testing" sounds more sensible
>>> at lesat to me.
>>
>> This change makes the repo suitable
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
> templates/hooks--query-fsmonitor.sample | 37
> +
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 templates/hooks--query-fsmonitor.sample
Please make this file executable like the other sample hook scr
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2017 6:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>>
>>> A new git hook (query-fsmonitor) must exist and be enabled
>>> (core.fsmonitor=true) that takes a time_t formatted as a string and
>>> outputs t
Yeah, they could be encoded in the integration script, but it could be
better if it was possible to just configure a generic command line.
For example if the directory that should be watched for filesystem
changes could be passed as well as the time since the last changes,
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
> On 5/30/2017 9:18 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>>
>>> + printf "untracked\0"
>>> + printf "dir1/untracked\0&
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 5/27/2017 2:57 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/24/2017 6:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>>&g
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00..395db46d55
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='git
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Joel Teichroeb wrote:
[...]
> +int untracked_files(struct strbuf *out, int include_untracked,
> + const char **argv)
> +{
> + struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> + cp.git_cmd = 1;
> + argv_array_push(&cp.args, "ls-files
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/2017 6:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>>
>>> Design
>>> ~~
>>>
>>> A new git hook (query-fsmonitor) must exist and be enabled
>>> (core.fsmonitor=true) that tak
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
> This hook script integrates the new fsmonitor capabilities of git with
> the cross platform Watchman file watching service. To use the script:
>
> Download and install Watchman from https://facebook.github.io/watchman/
> and instruct Watchman to
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
> When the index is read from disk, the query-fsmonitor index extension is
> used to flag the last known potentially dirty index and untracked cach
s/cach/cache/
> entries.
[...]
> diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
> index 188811920c..36423c77cc
> Design
> ~~
>
> A new git hook (query-fsmonitor) must exist and be enabled
> (core.fsmonitor=true) that takes a time_t formatted as a string and
> outputs to stdout all files that have been modified since the requested
> time.
Is there a reason why there is a new hook, instead of a
"core.fsm
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Andreas Heiduk wrote:
> The manual for "git interpret-trailers" mentioned a non-existing
> literal `overwrite` for its config option `trailer.ifexists`. Fixed
> by using `replace` instead.
Yeah, I forgot to change it to `replace` there.
> Signed-off-by: Andreas H
Hi everyone,
The 27th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
https://git.github.io/rev_news/2017/05/17/edition-27/
Thanks a lot to all the contributors and helpers!
Enjoy,
Christian, Thomas, Jakub and Markus.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
>
>
> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-27.md
>
> Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section eithe
Hi,
A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-27.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub is
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
>
>
> On 5/8/2017 5:45 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>> This test does not pass when the GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX env variable is
>> set on my Linux machine.
>>
>> Also it looks like you sent a v8 of thi
(Adding Dave in Cc as it looks like he is involved.)
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> I recently sent out a request for assistance, after noticing that the
> untracked cache is simply thrown away after operations such as
> `git checkout` or `git reset --hard`:
>
> htt
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t1450-fsck.sh b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> index 33a51c9..677e15a 100755
> --- a/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> +++ b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> @@ -689,4 +689,17 @@ test_expect_success 'bogus head does not fallback to all
> heads' '
> ! grep $blob out
> '
>
>
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Christian Couder writes:
>>
>>> This patch series contains 2 patches that have already been sent to
>>> the list but have felt through the cracks. It would be nice if they
From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
When split-index is being used, we have two cache_entry arrays in
index_state->cache[] and index_state->split_index->base->cache[].
index_state->cache[] may share the same entries with base->cache[] so
we can quickly determine what entries are shared. This makes memory
(5.85+1.36) -48.9% 8.06(6.54+1.60) -42.8%
7.53(6.40+1.12) -46.5%
3400.6: rebase a lot of unrelated changes with split-index
14.10(10.11+3.94) 6.94(5.71+1.27) -50.8% 7.99(6.49+1.57) -43.3%
6.10(5.12+1.07) -56.7%
On bigger repositories results are likely to be better.
Christian
Rebasing onto many changes is interesting, but it's also
interesting to see what happens when rebasing many changes.
And while at it, let's also look at the impact of using a
split index.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/perf/p3400-rebase.sh | 22 +-
1 file c
Hi,
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Delanoe Eric wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We need a great deal of traceability for our source, made of many scripts in
> interpreted languages, spread in many "independent" modules, as far as can be
> ;-).
> In particular, somebody troubleshooting a script in producti
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> Sorry if I'm bikeshedding here, but it does look like adding an alternate
> 'bisect' strategy may be useful for this style of integration testing.
>
> To me, given the multiplicity of independent branches being brought
> together, it should
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 21.04.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Christian Couder:
>>
>> First bisect should ask you to test merge bases only if there are
>> "good" commits that are not ancestors of the "bad" commit.
>
>
>
Hi Dscho,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>>
>> First bisect should ask you to test merge bases only if there are
>> "good" commits that are not ancestors of the "bad" commit.
>
> Please note that this is a stateless job. The only "state" I have is the
> branch name.
>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer
> wrote:
>> On 04/20, Christian Couder wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you try with the following patch:
>>>
>>> http://public-inbox.org/gi
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> On 04/20, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>> Could you try with the following patch:
>>
>> http://public-inbox.org/git/20170330210354.20018-1-chrisc...@tuxfamily.org/
>
> Yeah, I tried with and without that pat
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>
> Since that "let's aggregate everything and only push out the final result
> at the end of the day" approach does not really allow the Continuous
> Testing to identify problems associated with individual topic branches, I
> have anoth
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Christian Couder
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer
>>> wrote:
>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/20, Christian Couder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you tr
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> On 04/20, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>> Could you try with the following patch:
>>
>> http://public-inbox.org/git/20170330210354.20018-1-chrisc...@tuxfamily.org/
>
> Yeah, I tried with and without that pat
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> Could you try with the following patch:
>>
>> http://public-inbox.org/git/20170330210354.20018-1-chrisc...@tuxfamily.org/
>
> Ah, this reminds me. The patch has been in the stall
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to run the test suite with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=YesPlease
> and noticed that a few tests are broken both in pu and master.
>
> Below the test failures on master:
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t70
Hi everyone,
The 26th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
https://git.github.io/rev_news/2017/04/19/edition-26/
Thanks a lot to all the contributors and helpers!
Enjoy,
Christian, Thomas, Jakub and Markus.
Hi Michael,
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for the ping on the draft.
Thanks for you input on this!
> Re gpg: Maybe some valuable point of information is what Werner Koch
> himself said in that thread:
> "That [the command line is not a stable API to GnuPG] is not true. The
> command line interface
It looks like in 89c3b0ad43 (name-hash: add perf test for lazy_init_name_hash,
2017-03-23) p0004 was not created with the execute unix rights.
Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/perf/p0004-lazy-init-name-hash.sh | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Rebasing onto many changes is interesting, but it's also
interesting to see what happens when rebasing many changes.
And while at it, let's also look at the impact of using a
split index.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/perf/p3400-rebase.sh | 22 +-
1 file c
Hi,
A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-26.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub is
> * cc/split-index-config (2017-03-30) 1 commit
> - read-cache: avoid using git_path() in freshen_shared_index()
>
> The split-index code configuration code used an unsafe git_path()
> function without copying its result out.
>
> Needs to be explained better.
> The code looked OK, though.
In:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:42:23PM +, David Turner wrote:
>
>> > What does it look like when it fails? What does GIT_TRACE_CURL look like
>> > (or
>> > GIT_CURL_VERBOSE if your client is older, but remember to sanitize any auth
>> > lines)?
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/git-news.sh b/git-news.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00..1707dc633e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/git-news.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +#
> +
> +/usr/bin/sensible-browser https://git.github.io/rev_news/
Than
read_index_from(), 2017-03-06) is involved,
which points to the unsafe use of git_path() in
freshen_shared_index().
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
The only changes in this v2 compared to the previous version are
in the title and commit message, which have been changed according
to:
http://public
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:06:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > This shows that we should be careful not to use git_path() in
>> > freshen_shared_index(). It is using a shared buffer that can
>> > too easily lead to races.
>>
>> The impres
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:58:00AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
>> index 6dd..369c207 100644
>> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
>> +++ b/built
As xgetcwd() returns an allocated buffer, we should free this
buffer when we don't need it any more.
This was found by Coverity.
Reported-by: Jeff King
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/update-index.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bu
Hi Charles,
I maybe available to mentor. I am in Paris so closer to London.
I have no date restriction for the weekends after April 9th yet.
Thanks,
Christian.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Charles Bailey wrote:
> Bloomberg would like to host a Git hackathon over a weekend in both New
> Yor
_path() in
freshen_shared_index(). It is using a shared buffer that can
too easily lead to races.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index e447751823..2f10242c24 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:15:12PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:43 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
>> > FreeBSD implements getcwd(3) as a syscall, but falls back to a version
>> > based
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:43 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
>>> FreeBSD implements getcwd(3) as a syscall, but falls back to a version
>>> based on r
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:43 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
> FreeBSD implements getcwd(3) as a syscall, but falls back to a version
> based on readdir(3) if it fails for some reason. The latter requires
> permissions to read and execute path components, while the former does
> not. That means that if
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Pickfire wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Ivan Tham wrote:
>>
>> > Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Ivan Tham wrote:
>> > > > Stefan Beller wrote:
>> > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ivan Tham
>> > > >
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Devin Lehmacher wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am a student studying Computer Science at Cornell University. I
> already completed a microproject, Move ~/.git-credential-cache/socket to
> $XDG_CACHE_HOME/credential/socket a week and a half ago or so.
Nice. I
Please add something like [GSoC] in the subject so that it is easy for
us to find GSoC related patches.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Prathamesh wrote:
> Whenever a git command is present in the upstream of a pipe, its failure
> gets masked by piping and hence it should be avoided for testing
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:08 PM, sourav mondal
>> wrote:
>>> javascript is one of the famous langugae,it's needs a built-in driver.
>>
>> Please use "Javascrip
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:08 PM, sourav mondal
wrote:
> javascript is one of the famous langugae,it's needs a built-in driver.
Please use "Javascript" instead of "javascript".
There is a typo in "language" above, also maybe "it needs" instead of
"it's needs", and please add a blank space before i
Hi everyone,
The 25th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
https://git.github.io/rev_news/2017/03/15/edition-25/
Thanks a lot to all the contributors and helpers!
Enjoy,
Christian, Thomas, Jakub and Markus.
Hi,
A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-25.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub is
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:23 AM, sourav mondal
wrote:
> I'm working on "Add more builtin pattern for userdiff" as my microproject for
> Gsoc17.As I noticed javascript's builtin driver was not present in userdiff
> of git/git tree. Hopefully this pattern will cover all cases. I'm really
> eager
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> When reporting bugs, users will usually look at the output of
>> 'git --version' at one point to write a quality bug report.
>> So that is a good spot to provide additional information to the user
>> about
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> index 525737a5d8..4938496194 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
> 'git tag' [-a | -s | -u ]
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> From: Prathamesh
>
> Whenever a git command is present in the upstream of a pipe, its failure
> gets masked by piping and hence it should be avoided for testing the
> upstream git command. By writing out the output of the git command to
>
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Avinash Tiwary wrote:
> [GSOC]
> Sir, i am interested in git projects and i want to complete one of the git
> microprojects. But i am unable to figure out which git repo they are talking
> about. Since , there is no link provided. Please help
On the microproject pa
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> Whenever a git command is present in the upstream of a pipe, its failure
> gets masked by piping and hence it should be avoided for testing the
> upstream git command. By writing out the output of the git command to
> a file, we can test
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> The exit code of the upstream of a pipe is ignored thus we should avoid
> using it.
You might want to say more specifically that we should avoid piping a
git command into another one as this could mask a failure of the git
command.
> By
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Vedant Bassi wrote:
> As part of my microproject :
>
> Use unsigned integral type for collection of bits:
> Pick one field of a structure that (1) is of signed integral type and
> (2) is used as a collection of multiple bits. Discuss if there is a
> good reason why
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Vedant Bassi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to participate in GSoC 2017 and I have chosen the Use
> unsigned integral type for collection of bits , idea from the Micro
> projects list.
>
> I request the help of the community for clarifying a few questions that
This new function will be used in a following commit to know
if we want to use the split index feature or not.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 1 +
config.c | 10 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 80b6372cf7..03de80daae 100644
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
config.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
index c6b874a7bf..2ac1aa19b0 100644
--- a/config.c
+++ b/config.c
@@ -1728,8 +1728,8 @@ int git_config_get_untracked_cache(void)
if
ox.org/git/2016122610.17150-1-chrisc...@tuxfamily.org/
v4:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20170227180019.18666-1-chrisc...@tuxfamily.org/
Christian Couder (22):
config: mark an error message up for translation
t1700: change here document style
config: add git_config_get_split_index()
spl
This will make us use the split-index feature or not depending
on the value of the "core.splitIndex" config variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 9054369dd0..
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 72 ++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index 9d7c01c3e1..00a64bed97 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split
This function will be used in a following commit to get the expiration
time of the shared index files from the config, and it is generic
enough to be put in "config.c".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/gc.c | 18 +++---
cache.h | 3 +++
config.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index 5ea227e6a1..aa2aff1778 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 47603f5484..f102879261 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -334,6 +334,10
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index b64aa7db2d..2afd5d982b 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2864,6 +2864,18
This improves test indentation by getting rid of the outdated
here document style.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 170 -
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700
Also use the functions in cmd_update_index() in
builtin/update-index.c.
These functions will be used in a following commit to tweak
our use of the split-index feature depending on the setting
of a configuration variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/update-index.c | 18
soon.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 29 ++---
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index aeb413a508..13375fa0ff 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -1674,6 +1674,19 @@ int do_read_
will happen and why.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/update-index.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
index 24fdadfa4b..d74d72cc7f 100644
--- a/builtin/update-index.c
+++ b/builtin
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 44
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index 00a64bed97..f5a95a6c28 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split
a new one.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 1 +
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 14 +++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 89c95d59b3..e447751823 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -1
It looks better and is simpler to review when we don't compute
the same things many times in the function.
It will also help make the following commit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --
This new function will be used in a following commit to get the
value of the "splitIndex.maxPercentChange" config variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 1 +
config.c | 15 +++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index f102879261..b64aa7db2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2851,6
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
b/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
index 7386c93162..e091b2a409 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
+++ b
ecently used shared index file will not be
deleted.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 64 +++-
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 13375fa0ff..16c05f359b 100644
--
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 37 +
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 2afd5d982b
This function will be used in a commit soon, so let's make
it available globally.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 3 +++
sha1_file.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 0bb9adcd31..a35e9d5187 100644
--- a/cache.h
ts are assuming that the shared index is
regenerated only when `git update-index --split-index` is used.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 32
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 1 +
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/read-cache.c
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ever since "bisect--helper" was introduced in 1bf072e366
> ("bisect--helper: implement "git bisect--helper"", 2009-03-26),
> after setting up the "rev-list $bad --not $good_ones" machinery, the
> code somehow prepared to mark the trees and bl
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>
>> >> +set -e
>> >
>> > Is this really necessary? I really like to avoid `set -e`, in
>> > particular when we do pretty much everything in && chains anyway.
>>
>> Agreed, not really necessary here as we just invoke one command. Out of
>
Hi everyone,
I am happy to let you know that Git has been accepted as a GSoC mentor
organization again this year.
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/
I invited Dscho and Stefan as potential mentors for Git. I also
invited Junio to give him access to students proposals and the
op
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Dennis Kaarsemaker writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 23:18 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 08:11:11PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>
>>> > > So I dunno. I could really go either way on it. Feel free to drop it, or
>>>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 8e745bda52..0e9982c5e3 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2844,6 +2844,18
1101 - 1200 of 3241 matches
Mail list logo
