Re: Documentation of post-receive hook

2017-11-22 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 10:14 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Your suggesting to mention that particular message hints at me that > you feel that the users may not necessarily understand that push did > not result in any update of references on the other side when they > see it.  If the message was

Re: Documentation of post-receive hook

2017-11-21 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On November 20, 2017 2:17:58 AM GMT+01:00, >How about this rewrite? Would it consider all the points raised and >make it easier to understand? > >This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' when it reacts to >'git push' and updates reference(s) in its repository. I think it's much more

Re: Documentation of post-receive hook

2017-11-19 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 12:42 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Christoph Michelbach wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > So an updated suggestion for the text would be: > > >   >

Re: Documentation of post-receive hook

2017-11-19 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > So an updated suggestion for the text would be: >  >  This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository, >  which happens when a 'git push' is done on a local repository. >  > Oh, wait.  That is what we already

Documentation of post-receive hook

2017-11-16 Thread Christoph Michelbach
as it informs the reader about this behavior at the first convenient opportunity. -- Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-25 Thread Christoph Michelbach
I give up. Bye. On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 18:35 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I'm sorry, somehow my email client deleted half of your message when I saved > > it > > when replying. I only noticed th

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-24 Thread Christoph Michelbach
-0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes: > > From: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:49:57 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Doc./git-checkout: correct doc. of checkout > > ... >

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-24 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 18:55 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes: > > From: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:49:57 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Doc./git-c

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-22 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > > > Obviously, "grab all paths that match out

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-18 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Philip Oakley" writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we'd created and added a file d just before the checkout, > > > > what > > > > should > > > > have happened to d, and why? > > > I understand what the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-18 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:26 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Philip Oakley" writes: > > > > > I'd guess that the misunderstanding is that you maybe thought that > > the > > whole directory would be reset to it's old state and the files b and > > c > > deleted, rather than

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-18 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 21:59 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > I've added back the list, as it was accidentally dropped. Thanks. I'm sorry. I apparently pressed the wrong button in my emails client. What I wrote is visible in your quote. > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac.

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-16 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 22:25 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com> > > It's: git checkout [-p|--patch] [] [--] ... > The one I quoted is direct from the Synopsis, which does indicate > there are  > p

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-16 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 19:03 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com> > > > > On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > > > > > > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <miche

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-16 Thread Christoph Michelbach
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com> > > > > While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes > > introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was > >

[PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout clearer

2017-04-15 Thread Christoph Michelbach
While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically pointed out. Signed-off-by: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> ---  Documentation/git-checko

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Number truncation with 4+ GB files on 32-bit systems

2016-07-06 Thread Christoph Michelbach
-04-32-bit:~/g$  on the virtual machine. Not including the mailing list in CC wasn't intended. -- With kind regards Christoph Michelbach On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:23 +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christoph Michelbach > <michelbac...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Number truncation with 4+ GB files on 32-bit systems

2016-07-05 Thread Christoph Michelbach
Thank you very much! -- With kind regards Christoph Michelbach On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 19:05 +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > Since I now could reproduce the problem that Christoph showed, I > decided to send the good patches out. To sum up, we use "unsigned > long" in

Re: Missing Package in git Installation Instructions (git-scm.com)

2016-07-05 Thread Christoph Michelbach
. -- With kind regards Christoph Michelbach On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 15:24 +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > W dniu 2016-07-05 o 08:10, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Christoph Michelbach wrote: > > > > > > > >

Missing Package in git Installation Instructions (git-scm.com)

2016-07-04 Thread Christoph Michelbach
. Just tried this on a fresh Ubuntu 16.04 installation. -- With kind regards Christoph Michelbach -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[bug] Reliably Reproducible Bad Packing of Objects

2016-06-24 Thread Christoph Michelbach
14.04), git will try to memory-map a too big file resulting in a different error. -- With kind regards Christoph Michelbach -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html