On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 10:14 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Your suggesting to mention that particular message hints at me that
> you feel that the users may not necessarily understand that push did
> not result in any update of references on the other side when they
> see it. If the message was
On November 20, 2017 2:17:58 AM GMT+01:00,
>How about this rewrite? Would it consider all the points raised and
>make it easier to understand?
>
>This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' when it reacts to
>'git push' and updates reference(s) in its repository.
I think it's much more
On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 12:42 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Christoph Michelbach wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >
> > > So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
> > >
>
On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
>
> This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository,
> which happens when a 'git push' is done on a local repository.
>
> Oh, wait. That is what we already
as it informs the reader about this
behavior at the first convenient opportunity.
--
Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com>
I give up. Bye.
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 18:35 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I'm sorry, somehow my email client deleted half of your message when I saved
> > it
> > when replying. I only noticed th
-0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes:
> > From: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:49:57 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Doc./git-checkout: correct doc. of checkout
> > ...
>
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 18:55 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes:
> > From: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:49:57 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Doc./git-c
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Obviously, "grab all paths that match out
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Philip Oakley" writes:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If we'd created and added a file d just before the checkout,
> > > > what
> > > > should
> > > > have happened to d, and why?
> > > I understand what the
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:26 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Philip Oakley" writes:
>
> >
> > I'd guess that the misunderstanding is that you maybe thought that
> > the
> > whole directory would be reset to it's old state and the files b and
> > c
> > deleted, rather than
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 21:59 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> I've added back the list, as it was accidentally dropped.
Thanks. I'm sorry. I apparently pressed the wrong button in my emails
client. What I wrote is visible in your quote.
> From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac.
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 22:25 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com>
> > It's: git checkout [-p|--patch] [] [--] ...
> The one I quoted is direct from the Synopsis, which does indicate
> there are
> p
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 19:03 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com>
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "Christoph Michelbach" <miche
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbac...@gmail.com>
> >
> > While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
> > introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
> >
While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically
pointed out.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Michelbach <michelbac...@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/git-checko
-04-32-bit:~/g$
on the virtual machine.
Not including the mailing list in CC wasn't intended.
--
With kind regards
Christoph Michelbach
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:23 +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christoph Michelbach
> <michelbac...@gmail.com> wrote:
&g
Thank you very much!
--
With kind regards
Christoph Michelbach
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 19:05 +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> Since I now could reproduce the problem that Christoph showed, I
> decided to send the good patches out. To sum up, we use "unsigned
> long" in
.
--
With kind regards
Christoph Michelbach
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 15:24 +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-05 o 08:10, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Christoph Michelbach wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
. Just tried this on a fresh Ubuntu 16.04
installation.
--
With kind regards
Christoph Michelbach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
14.04), git will
try to memory-map a too big file resulting in a different error.
--
With kind regards
Christoph Michelbach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
21 matches
Mail list logo