On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com writes:
I've been looking at the refspecs for git fetch, and noticed that
globs are partially supported. I wanted to use something like:
refs/tags/some-prefix-*:refs/tags/some-prefix-*
as a refspec, so
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Alex Riesen wrote:
Hi list,
when git-clone was built in, its treatment of umask has changed: the shell
version respected umask for newly created directories by using plain mkdir(1),
and the builtin version just uses mkdir(work_tree, 0755).
Is it intentional?
I have
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I have several requests to people who are interested in merges
and read-tree changes.
I am pretty much set to use the recent read-tree updates Daniel
has been working on. The only reason it has not hit the
master branch yet, except that it still
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It tries to make sure that there is room to put stuff for resolving a
conflict without messing with modified files in the directory.
I agree it can be used that way, but nobody seems to use
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In case #16, I'm not sure what I should produce. I think the best thing
might be to not leave anything in stage 1. The desired end effect is that
the user is given a file with a section like
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:33:42PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote:
Of the 500 merge commits that currently exists in the kernel
repository 19 produces non-clean merges with git-merge-script
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote:
The first one agrees with what was actually committed. For the second
one the difference between the tree produced by the algorithm and what
was committed is:
diff --git a/include/net/ieee80211.h b/include/net/ieee80211.h
---
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Darrin Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 01:41 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I've got a version of read-tree which accepts multiple ancestors and does
a merge using information from all of them.
Do the multiple ancestors have to share a common parent? More
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume that what you want is something to include everything from two
commits, which would give conflicts if a name is reused?
My understanding is that Darrin wants to do what Linus did when
he
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote:
Of the 500 merge commits that currently exists in the kernel
repository 19 produces non-clean merges with git-merge-script. The
four merge cases listed in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] are cleanly merged by
git-merge-script. Every merge commit which is cleanly
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got a version of read-tree which accepts multiple ancestors and does
a merge using information from all of them.
After disabling the debugging printf(), I used this read-tree to
try resolving
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote:
After a quick look through the diff source I didn't find anything
else. It's quite possible that I haved missed something though. Most
of the translated messages are related to error reporting, which I
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you know if there's anything like case #16 in there? I'd be interested
to know if there's anything that gets handled automatically in different
ways depending on which single base is used
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good. (Although that patch doesn't seem to be directly on top of my
version; I can tell what it's doing anyway)
That one was against the proposed updates head. I've updated it
again to include
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
tree.c | 21 +
tree.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
3bfcc20b6aeff3e1fbcce97a426383c9770a2105
diff --git a/tree.c b/tree.c
--- a/tree.c
+++ b/tree.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
#include tree.h
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
object.c | 11 +++
object.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
88cf2db55848e7a2cf655171c7e9fd74c70a0281
diff --git a/object.c b/object.c
--- a/object.c
+++ b/object.c
@@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ struct
Adds support for multiple ancestors, removes --emu23, much simplification.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
read-tree.c | 811 +++--
t/t1005-read-tree-m-2way-emu23.sh | 422 ---
2 files changed, 425
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow
---
Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt | 92 +
1 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt
7544be0a8eda7b796150729a7795c2639278da62
diff --git a/Documentation
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the problem is not fully understood it can be difficult to come up
with the proper solution. And with the example above the problem should
be really easy to understand.
Then we have the tree as used by
Various messages have already described this series. There's still a
memory leak that should get resolved, but otherwise it should work. I'm
not entirely sure that all directory-file conflict cases are handled
properly, and some undefined cases behave differently. Also, I was a bit
careless
A few things to improve testing. I'll clean up the series as a whole once
it's tested.
This removes the emu23 tests; I think that the only DF conflict tests were
in that set, however, so these should be fished out and added to something
else.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tim Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
git-update-cache for instance?
I am not sure which 'cache' commands need to be 'index' now.
Logically you are right, but I suspect that may not fly well in
practice. Too many of us have already got our
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any current use for read-tree with multiple trees without -m or
equivalent?
I did not know it even allowed multiple trees without -m, but
you are right. It does not seem to complain.
I
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel, I do not know what your current status is, but I think
you need something like this.
Yup, I forgot to actually test that functionality.
---
diff --git a/tree.c b/tree.c
--- a/tree.c
+++ b/tree.c
@@ -224,10 +224,12 @@ struct tree
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dan, I really really *REALLY* wanted to try this out in pu
branch and even was about to rig some torture chamber for
testing before applying the patch, but you got the shiny blue
bat X-.
I'll send a replacement with the settings correct.
A patch
Adds object_list_append() and a function to get the struct tree from an ent.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
object.c | 11 +++
object.h |3 +++
tree.c | 19 +++
tree.h |3 +++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of
having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I
finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to know
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Back from holiday. Thanks to all who replied to this thread.
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:05 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Having a useful diff isn't really a requirement for a parent; the diff in
the case of a merge is going to be the total
I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of
having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I
finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to know which of
the common ancestors contributed which, and, if some of them don't have a
path, we
Adds object_list_append() and a function to get the struct tree from an ent.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
object.c | 11 +++
object.h |3 +++
tree.c | 19 +++
tree.h |3 +++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
read-tree.c | 522 ++-
1 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
d0f45ad81db2e133c49c23bd09c5615da344bb5c
diff --git a/read-tree.c b/read-tree.c
--- a/read-tree.c
+++ b/read
I've gotten to the point of having all of the entries for a given path
ready to put into the cache at the same, and now I want to convert the
merge functions to take their data directly, rather than in the cache, so
that they can take extra entries for extra ancestors.
Part of threeway_merge,
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On 8/27/05, Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with both of these (and doing it in the build system) is that,
when a project includes another project, you generally don't want whatever
revision of the included project happens
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
What I missed was that the effect of causes_df_conflict is to give no
merge for the entry, rather than giving an error overall. So I do need an
equivalent.
Daniel,
I'm not 100% sure what you're
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
One thing that makes me reluctant to recommend this merging
unrelated projects business is that I suspect that it makes
things _much_ harder for the upstream project that is being
merged, and should not be done without prior arrangement; Linus
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Of course, this is going to take a bit of work, because read-tree
currently puts all of its arguments into the cache and then works on
merging, and taking multiple ancestors requires putting them somewhere
else, because they won't fit in the cache
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I have another anomaly in my GIT tree. A patch to
back out a bogus change to arch/ia64/hp/sim/boot/bootloader.c
in my release branch at commit
62d75f3753647656323b0365faa43fc1a8f7be97
appears to have been
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Hi,
Recently cogito again say that the rsync method will be deprecated in
future (due to http-pull now supporting pack objects I suppose), but it
seems to me that it still have other issues:
-
lycan linux-2.6 # git pull origin
Fetching
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Now, if the shared patch hadn't been a patch, but a shared _commit_, then
the thing would have been unambiguous - the shared commit would have been
the merge point, and the revert would have clearly undone that shared
commit.
Actually, it was a
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
This brings up a good point (indirectly). git prune would destroy the
undo objects. I had thought of this but decided to ignore it for the
time being.
If you made undo store the tree under refs somewhere, git prune would
preserve it.
-Daniel
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I'm starting to work on letting the merging process see multiple
ancestors, and I think it's messy enough that I should actually discuss
it.
Review of the issue:
It is possible to lost reverts in cases when
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
So the point is that there are things which are, in fact, parents, but we
don't want to list them, because it's not desired information.
What's the definition of a parent in GIT terms? What are the
restriction for a commit object to be a parent?
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
Hello,
I recently started using git to revision control the source for my
web-page. I wrote a post-update hook to checkout the files when I push
to the 'live' repository.
In this particular context I decided that it was important to me to remove
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:43:56PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
Hello,
I recently started using git to revision control the source for my
web-page. I wrote a post-update hook to checkout the files
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
The point is to push and use a post-update hook to do the checkout. So,
this won't be possible.
You could have the remote repository be something like
~/git/website.git, and have a hook which does: cd ~/www; git pull
~/git/website.git/. That is, have
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Jan Veldeman wrote:
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Something is legitimate as a parent if someone took that commit and did
something to it to get the new commit. The operation which caused the
change is not specified. But you
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote:
The thing that this doesn't do is remove empty directories when the last
file is deleted. I once expressed the opinion in a previous thread that
directories should be added and removed explicitly in git. (Thus
allowing an empty directory to be
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Only lightly tested, in the sense that I did only this one case
and nothing else. For a large repository and with complex
merges, merge-base -a _might_ end up reporting many
candidates, in which case the pre-merge step to figure out the
best merge
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Jan Veldeman wrote:
Catalin Marinas wrote:
So for example, you only tag (freeze) the history when exporting the
patches. When an error is being reported on that version, it's easy to
view
it and also view the progress that was already been made on those
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
tree object::
- An object containing a list of blob and/or tree objects.
- (A tree usually corresponds to a directory without
- subdirectories).
+ An object containing a list of file names and modes along with refs
+ to
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
long, long time. Here?s my first stab at the glossary, attached the
alphabetically sorted, asciidoc marked up txt file (Comments?
Suggestions? Pizzas?):
object::
The unit of storage in GIT. It is uniquely identified by
the
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
- Are all the files in Documentation/ reachable from git(7)
or otherwise made into a standalone document using asciidoc
by the Makefile? I haven't looked into documentation
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Finally, I have to say that that info directory is confusing. Namely,
there's two of them - the git info and the object info directories are
totally different directories - maybe logical, but to me it smells like
info is here a code-name for misc
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
If you use the GIT_DIR environment variable approach, it assumes that all
filenames you give it are absolute and acts the way it always did before.
Comments? Like? Dislike?
I'm all in favor, at least in the general case. I suspect there'll be some
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hello,
I've wondered how slow the protocols other than rsync are, and the
(well, a bit dubious; especially wrt. caching on the remote side)
results are:
git clone-pack:ssh 25s
git rsync 27s
git
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ryan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was waiting until you said, Ok, 1.00 tomorrow morning
Makes sense. There would be some weeks until that happens I am
afraid.
It might be worth putting the list of things left to do before 1.0 in the
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I should be able to get http-pull down to the neighborhood of
(current) ssh-pull; http-pull is that slow (when the source repository
isn't packed) because it's entirely sequential, rather than
Note that the pack file has to be in the usual location if it gets
installed later.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cache.h |2 ++
sha1_file.c | 10 --
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
59e5c6d163edae5da6136560d48a4750cceacdc6
diff --git
If it doesn't find an object, it looks for an index that contains it
and uses the same methods on that instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
local-pull.c | 112 +++---
1 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 21 deletions
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know
any better place to ask:
Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git /
cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend
a new Feature
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
And it's possible that git usage won't expand all that much either. But
quite frankly, I think git is a lot better than CVS (or even SVN) by now,
and I wouldn't be surprised if it started getting some use outside of the
git-only and kernel projects
). Synchronously process anything you already have.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
pull.c | 57 -
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
9b6b4b259c6b00d5b2502c158bc800d7623352bc
diff --git a/pull.c b/pull.c
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It should work anyway,...
That is true. Please forget about the recommendation to slurp
packs and not falling back on commit walker.
Thanks for the patch.
No problem; I had been wondering what
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But what about the branch name? Should we just ask the user? Together with
a flag, like
git checkout -b new-branch v2.6.12
for somebody who wants to specify the branch name? Or should we pick a
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
$GIT_DIR/objects/pack subdirectory - that would make git itself start
possibly using
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Darrin Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 15:56 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
+ curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_FILE, indexfile);
+ curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_WRITEFUNCTION, fwrite);
+ curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_URL, url);
I was hoping to send
Support for parsing index files without pack files, installing pack
files while running, and checking what pack files are available.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
commit b686d7a0377c24e05dbed0dafe909dda6c3dfb48
tree ce285b1a0adb4f8d415f72668a77bc1f1f92e1e1
parent
This series has one patch which is ready to go in and one that's not
(although it's a reasonable phony for the current state of the git world).
1: Several additional functions are needed in the library to support
progressively getting pack data from some remote location and using it
to
Support for downloading the pack file
e3117bbaf6a59cb53c3f6f0d9b17b9433f0e4135 when appropriate. (Will
support other pack files when the repository has a list of them.)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
commit 74132562a2f6cfce9690a5091de7e85bd51d88af
tree
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Dan Holmsand wrote:
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I have a design for using http-pull on a packed repository, and it only
requires one extra file in the repository: an append-only list of the pack
files (because getting the directory listing is very painful and
failure
Make the --recover flag check the parents of commits which are already
available. This is needed currently to deal with cases where a parent is
pulled along with a commit (in a pack, e.g.) and references above that
parent aren't also pulled together.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL
Remove map_sha1_file(), now unused.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
commit c21a02262f770a25b005378e06354e582aa1bfd8
tree 7ac9fabe666f00f37572e7b349fdb859bf8a6491
parent 264ff9f3dcde5553728b34fa08e04643b2b55946
author Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1121033599 -0400
Add write_sha1_to_fd(), which writes an object to a file descriptor. This
includes support for unpacking it and recompressing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
commit 264ff9f3dcde5553728b34fa08e04643b2b55946
tree 353fe33ae9c7265d7b685bca864d657e3efe2849
parent
If git-ssh-push can't interpret the commit-id, there are various possible
issues. Just giving the usage message makes it hard to identify what could
be wrong.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
commit 7a274ce1f93e6092dcf226d546a58d2d6df9d13c
tree
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
How about an option to git-rev-list to take a path, and (1) exclude any
branch where the version at that path ends up ignored in a merge and
(2) not list any revision where the version at that path
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
DB == Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DB Junio: what's missing from annotate/blame?
Which one are you talking about?
What I use to generate http://members.cox.net/junkio/Summary.txt
is an implementation of an algorithm I consider
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:00:33AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:46:35PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
I disagree. This already forces you to have two branches (one to pull
from to get the data, mirroring the remote branch, one for your real
work) uselessly and needlessly.
If you pull in a non-tracked tree, it certainly won't apply the
changes, so you
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I was looking at the tree part and am thinking that it would
make it much nicer if your tree object records path for each
entry.
You're entirely right, and I've actually now written the code that does
it. I'm planning to send out a patch for that
Here are the things I was saving for after the previous set:
1: Report the actual contents of trees
2: Add functions for scanning history by date
3: Add http-pull, a program to fetch the objects you need by HTTP
4: Change merge-base to find the most recent common ancestor
1 and 2 are core
This patch adds actual information to struct tree, making it possible to
tell what sorts of things the referenced objects are. This is needed for
http-pull, and Junio wanted something of the sort.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: tree.c
Functions for a date-ordered queue of commits, progressively pulled out of
the history incrementally. Linus wanted this for finding the most recent
common ancestor, and it might be relevant to logging.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: commit.c
This adds a command to pull a commit and dependant objects from an HTTP
server.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
===
--- 50afb5dd4184842d8da1da8dcb9ca6a591dfc5b0/Makefile (mode:100644
sha1
merge-base finds one of the best common ancestors of a pair of commits. In
particular, it finds one of the ones which is fewest commits away from the
further of the heads.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
in
the README again.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
===
--- d662b707e11391f6cfe597fd4d0bf9c41d34d01a/Makefile (mode:100644
sha1:b2ce7c5b63fffca59653b980d98379909f893d44
merge-base finds one of the best common ancestors of a pair of commits. In
particular, it finds one of the ones which is fewest commits away from the
further of the heads.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Brad Roberts wrote:
(ok, author looks better, but committer doesn't obey the AUTHOR_ vars yet)
They should't, but maybe I should add COMMITTER_xxx overrides. I just do
_not_ want people to think that they should claim to be
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Index: Makefile
===
--- d662b707e11391f6cfe597fd4d0bf9c41d34d01a/Makefile (mode:100644
sha1:b2ce7c5b63fffca59653b980d98379909f893d44)
+++
http-pull is a program that downloads from a (normal) HTTP server a commit
and all of the tree and blob objects it refers to (but not other commits,
etc.). Options could be used to make it download a larger or different
selection of objects.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
--- 45f926575d2c44072bfcf2317dbf3f0fbb513a4e/revision.h (mode:100644
sha1:28d0de3261a61f68e4e0948a25a416a515cd2e83)
+++ 37a0b01b85c2999243674d48bfc71cdba0e5518e/revision.h (mode:100644
sha1
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:49:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I'm not too kind at this. Either make it totally separate commands, or
make a required switch specifying what to do. Otherwise
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:51:59PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
merge-base finds one of the best common ancestors of a pair of commits. In
particular, it finds one of the ones which is fewest
This implements the parsing functions.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: blob.c
===
--- /dev/null (tree:5ca133e1b74aee39b2124c0ec9fd51539babb5e0)
+++ 1172a9b8f45b2fd640985595cc5258db3b027828/blob.c (mode
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Tony Luck wrote:
On 4/16/05, Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+buffer = read_sha1_file(sha1, type, size);
You never free this buffer.
Ideally, this should all be rearranged to share the code with
read-tree, and it should be fixed in common.
It would
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Martin Mares wrote:
Hello!
This adds a program to download a commit, the trees, and the blobs in them
from a remote repository using HTTP. It skips anything you already have.
Is it really necessary to write your own HTTP downloader? If so, is it
necessary to forget
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Adam Kropelin wrote:
Tony Luck wrote:
Otherwise this looks really nice. I was going to script something
similar using wget ... but that would have made zillions of seperate
connections. Not so kind to the server.
How about building a file list and doing a batch
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:06:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
I think fork is as good as anything for describing the operation. I had
thought about clone because it seemed to fill the role
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:17:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:47:55AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr
post 7.7 or so.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
===
--- ed4f6e454b40650b904ab72048b2f93a068dccc3/Makefile (mode:100644
sha1:b39b4ea37586693dd707d1d0750a9b580350ec50
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
