Eric S. Raymond wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 00:59:45 -0500:
> In summary, Subversion repository histories do not round-trip through
> reposurgeon editing. File content changes are preserved but some
> metadata is unavoidably lost. Furthermore, writing out a DVCS history
> in Subversion a
(note, other half of the thread is on dev@svn only..)
Eric S. Raymond wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:46:37 -0500:
> Daniel Shahaf :
> > You might also seek community consensus to reserve an svn:foo name for
> > the "original author" property --- perhaps svn:origin
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:34:23AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#svnrdump
> In other words, this is a limitation of the Serf-based backend that has
> been around since Subversion 1.4. I'm aware that it isn't documented as
> well as it should b
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:04:07AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:34:23AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#svnrdump
> > In other words, this is a limitation of the Serf-based backend that has
> &
Kyle McKay wrote on Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 19:46:40 -0700:
> On Jul 6, 2013, at 19:23, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Kyle McKay wrote:
>>
>>> Unless bulk updates are disabled when using the serf access method
>>> (the only one available with svn 1.8) for https?: urls,
>>> apply_textdelta does indeed get
5 matches
Mail list logo
