ot complained and deleted foo file again
I know my co-worker shouldn't had created a directory with the same
file he was deleting but I also think git shouldn't have allowed him
to stash at all, or should have been cleaver enough to actually stash
the directory with its files.
Regard
sorry I forgot:
$ git --version
git version 1.9.1
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Daniele Segato
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my coworker today claimed git stash deleted his files, I made him
> explain me what he did and I think it could actually be a bug even if
> happening only in a cor
annotated tags without a public announcement requiring all
developers to delete their local tags.
I'm not aware of any discussion you did about this matter but I think
there's something wrong here that should be fixed.
Regards,
Daniele Segato
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
From d0f4eca712e7cf74286bfab306763a8a571b6c95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Segato
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:33:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags
stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
should use one in
On 07/24/2013 10:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Daniele Segato writes:
Annotated and Lightweight tags are not the same thing
for git and you shouldn't mix them up. Annotated tags are meant for
release while lightweight tags are meant to tag random commits.
Nicely explained.
This is o
On 07/25/2013 04:47 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote:
On 13-07-25 09:45 AM, Daniele Segato wrote:
From d0f4eca712e7cf74286bfab306763a8a571b6c95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Segato
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:33:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags
From 34fdcb56e5784699ffa327ebfcd2c5cd99b61d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Segato
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:33:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags
stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
should use one in
On 07/26/2013 04:51 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote:
On 13-07-26 04:46 AM, Daniele Segato wrote:
From 34fdcb56e5784699ffa327ebfcd2c5cd99b61d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Segato
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:33:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags
stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
should use one in place of the other.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Segato
---
Documentation/git-tag.txt |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
index
On 07/26/2013 09:06 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:33:01PM +0200, Daniele Segato wrote:
stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
should use one in place of the other.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Segato
The intent of your patch seems reasonable to
ightweight tags by default.
--
Cheers,
Daniele Segato
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
p.
Hi Paolo, Philip, Stefan,
thank you, you've been very kind.
I think I've set it up, I'll try with the next patch, if any!
Regards,
Daniele Segato
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.ke
On 07/29/2013 05:04 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Marc Branchaud writes:
On 13-07-26 03:06 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:33:01PM +0200, Daniele Segato wrote:
stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
should use one in place of the other.
Signed
On 07/26/2013 11:13 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote:
On 13-07-26 01:19 PM, Daniele Segato wrote:
By the way which is your role in the community?
Don't want to be rude, I just don't know who I'm talking about :) the
documentation maintainer?
I'm just a git user and (very) oc
On 07/29/2013 08:02 PM, Daniele Segato wrote:
On 07/26/2013 09:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Eventually the description section should probably be tweaked to start
by explaining what the command is actually for. ;-)
Elaborating from this suggestion you gave me I tried to
rewrite/rearrange the
15 matches
Mail list logo
