On 15:27, Thu 05 Sep 13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Now the long option name is --no-index, it makes me wonder if -i
is a good synonym for it, and the longer I stare at it, the more
certain I become convinced that it is a bad choice.
I had originally called it --ignore-index at which point -i made
against the standard
ignores to ensure correct behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Dave Williams d...@opensourcesolutions.co.uk
---
In V3 I have taken on board comments from Junio Hamano and Eric
Sunshine from V2 ($gmane/233660).
In particlar Junio queried my approach in builtin/git-check-ignores.c
this behaviour deviates from the characteristics of `git add` and
`git status` its use case is unlikely to cause any user confusion.
Test scripts are augmented to check this option against the standard
ignores to ensure correct behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Dave Williams d...@opensourcesolutions.co.uk
) simply by-passes the check for the path
being in the index and hence allows tracked path to be checked too.
Whilst this behaviour deviates from the characteristics of git add and
git status its use case is unlikely to cause any user confusion.
Signed-off-by: Dave Williams d
4 matches
Mail list logo
