On 01/20/2013 01:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Implementing git rm -u as a tree-wide command would create a
discrepancy with git add -u. Implementing it as a current
directory command would make the migration harder if we eventually
try to
Hello everyone,
I am thinking about implementing a feature but I would appreciate any
feedback before I begin, because more experienced Git developers and
users may see some major problem that I do not.
Earlier today I deleted a file from a repository. I deleted it
normally, not by using `git
On 01/19/2013 04:49 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
I think `git add -u` would be closer. It would stage removal of
files, but would not stage untracked files. It would stage other
type of changes though.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Tomas Carnecky
Does `git add -A` do what you want?
Thank
On 01/19/2013 04:49 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Eric James Michael Ritz wrote:
When I came to my senses and realized that does not work I began to
wonder if `git rm -u` should exist. If any deleted, tracked files
are not part of the index to commit then `git rm -u` would add that
change
4 matches
Mail list logo
