Re: email as a bona fide git transport

2019-10-17 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 04:45:32PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:43:43PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > I wonder if it'd be also possible to then embed gpg signatures over > > > send-mail payloads so as they can be transparently trans

Re: email as a bona fide git transport

2019-10-17 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Santiago Torres Arias wrote: > Hi Willy, Vegard. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:10:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Vegard, > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:22:54PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > > > (cross-posted to git, LKML, and the kernel work

git email From: parsing (was Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver patches for 4.11-rc1)

2017-02-22 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:59:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > =?UTF-8?q?Simon=20Sandstr=C3=B6m?= (1): > > staging: vt6656: Add missing identifier names > > Wow, your scripts really screwed up that name

Re: 0 bot for Git

2016-04-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:57AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > At Git Merge Greg said (paraphrasing here): > > We waste developers time, because we have plenty of it. Maintainers time > however is precious because maintainers are the bottleneck and a scare > resource to come by. s/scar

Re: 0 bot for Git

2016-04-11 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:29:59PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > Resending as plain text. (I need to tame my mobile) > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for your talk at the Git Merge 2016! > > The Git community uses the same workflow as the kerne

Re: Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

2015-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:23:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > > > s/enw/new/ > > Heh, thanks; I wasn't planning to commit this one yet, but why not. Well, it's not good to apply a commit with no actual commit. That never a good thing, and was the thing that really c

Re: Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

2015-05-31 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:17:59AM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > I received the patch attached below as part of a submission against the > Linux kernel tree. The patch seems to have been hand-edited, and is not > correct, and patch verifies this as being a problem: > &

Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

2015-05-31 Thread Greg KH
Hi all, I received the patch attached below as part of a submission against the Linux kernel tree. The patch seems to have been hand-edited, and is not correct, and patch verifies this as being a problem: $ patch -p1 --dry-run < bad_patch.mbox checking file drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ie

Re: Is there some way to suppress Cc email only to stable?

2015-02-09 Thread Greg KH
tually send email to that address, > > > lest I get an automated nastygram in response. > > > > Interesting. Last time this came up, the result seemed to be > > different[*]. > > Hmmm... Greg KH didn't say there were no automated nastygrams, just > that

Re: Sources for 3.18-rc1 not uploaded

2014-10-20 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:37:09PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 20/10/14 02:28 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I have to wonder why 10f343ea (archive: honor tar.umask even for pax > > headers, 2014-08-03) is a problem but an earlier change v1.8.1.1~8^2 > > (archive-tar: split long paths mo

Re: [PATCH 4/8] staging: et131x: Remove ununsed statistics

2014-09-13 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:37:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:59:42PM +0100, Mark Einon wrote: > > >From struct ce_stats; unicast_pkts_rcvd, unicast_pkts_xmtd, > > multicast_pkts_xmtd, broadcast_pkts_rcvd and broadcast_pkts_xmtd > > For some reason something adds a '>

Re: "git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-02-04 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:05:55PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > The number of people this affects right now is only one (me), given that > > the offending file is not in Linus's tree right now, so he doesn't have > > issues with uploading new

Re: "git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-02-03 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:33:52PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 31.01.2013 18:28, schrieb Greg KH: > > I tracked this down to commit 22f0dcd9634a818a0c83f23ea1a48f2d620c0546 > > (archive-tar: split long paths more carefully). The diff of a hex dump > > of the tar archive

Re: "git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-02-03 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 31/01/13 12:41 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > Ugh, uploading a 431Mb file, over a flaky wireless connection (I end up > > doing lots of kernel releases while traveling), would be a horrible > > change. I

Re: "git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-02-03 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:32:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> How about fixing kup to teach the "let's cheat and let the other end > >> run 'git a

Re: "git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-01-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:32:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > The way we upload the Linux kernel to kernel.org involves creating a tar > > archive, signing the archive, and then just uploading the signature. > > The server then checks out t

"git archve --format=tar" output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

2013-01-31 Thread Greg KH
Hi, The way we upload the Linux kernel to kernel.org involves creating a tar archive, signing the archive, and then just uploading the signature. The server then checks out the repo based on the tag, generates the tar archive and checks the signature to make sure they match. A few days ago I rele

Re: no diffstat for 'git request-pull' (was Re: [GIT PATCH] char/misc changes for 3.7-rc1)

2012-10-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:03:47PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > Wait, what happened to the diffstat? Does the latest version of git not > > send out the diffstat for 'git request-pull'? It used to on older > > versions

no diffstat for 'git request-pull' (was Re: [GIT PATCH] char/misc changes for 3.7-rc1)

2012-10-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:54:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > The following changes since commit fea7a08acb13524b47711625eebea40a0ede69a0: > > Linux 3.6-rc3 (2012-08-22 13:29:06 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/k

Re: Funny 'git describe --contains' output

2012-08-29 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:36:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Greg KH writes: > > > >> In the Linux kernel tree, commit 0136db586c028f71e7cc21cc183064ff0d5919 > >> is a bit "odd". > >> > >&

Funny 'git describe --contains' output

2012-08-28 Thread Greg KH
Hi, In the Linux kernel tree, commit 0136db586c028f71e7cc21cc183064ff0d5919 is a bit "odd". If I go to look to see what release it was in, I normally do: $ git describe --contains 0136db586c028f71e7cc21cc183064ff0d5919 v3.6-rc1~59^2~56^2~76 However, it really showed up first in t

Re: git applymbox is too anal

2005-09-09 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Or am I missing some option to 'git applymbox' that I can't seem to > > find? > > No. git-apply wants an exact bit-for-bit match. Pa

Re: git applymbox is too anal

2005-09-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:25:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Ick. I'm trying to apply a bunch of patches to a git repo (the kernel > tree), using 'git applymbox' and it's just dieing on simple patches that > apply with fuzz. Ok, found another one. This time I looked a

Re: bisect gives strange answer

2005-08-04 Thread Greg KH
14769779dbd2737 (from > a18bcb7450840f07a772a45229de4811d930f461) > Author: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed Jul 6 09:09:38 2005 -0700 > > [PATCH] PCI: fix !CONFIG_HOTPLUG pci build problem > > Here's a patch to fix the build issue when CONFIG_HOTPLUG is not en

Re: git-pull-script hates me

2005-07-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > I just updated to the latest git tree, and now get the following when I > > try to pull from a ssh repo: > > > > $ git-pull-script

Re: git-pull-script hates me

2005-07-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:46:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Ok, below is a patch for this. It works, but then errors out with: > bash: git-upload-pack: command not found > fatal: unexpected EOF > > So I'm guessing that I have to convince the server owner to updat

git-pull-script hates me

2005-07-06 Thread Greg KH
I just updated to the latest git tree, and now get the following when I try to pull from a ssh repo: $ git-pull-script [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/public_html/udev.git/ fatal: I don't like '@'. Sue me. So I drop the @ and then get: $ git-pull-script someserver.org:/public_html/udev.git/ fatal: I don't

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.3 && request for testing

2005-04-21 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:09:31AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Hello, > > FYI, I've released git-pasky-0.6.3 earlier in the night. Hm, fun thing to try: go into a kernel git tree. rm Makefile git diff Watch it as it thinks that every Makefile in the kernel tree is now

Re: wit 0.0.3 - a web interface for git available

2005-04-21 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:28:27AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:42:53AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:29:11AM +0200, Christian Meder wrote: > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 && heads-up on upcoming changes

2005-04-20 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:12:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Pasky, > > what do you think about this change to "git log"? > > Here's a slightly updated version. > > It's identical to the previous one, except that it also feeds the re

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 && heads-up on upcoming changes

2005-04-20 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:28:15AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:09:06AM CEST, I got a letter > where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Yeah, yeah, it looks different from "cvs update", but dammit, wouldn't it > > be cool to just write "cg-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 && heads-up on upcoming changes

2005-04-20 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:56:33PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > The short command version will change from 'git' to 'cg', which should > be shorter to type and free the 'git' command for possible eventual > entry gate for the git commands (so that they are more > namespace-friendly, and it might m

Re: wit 0.0.3 - a web interface for git available

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:29:11AM +0200, Christian Meder wrote: > Hi, > > ok it's starting to look like spam ;-) > > I uploaded a new version of wit to http://www.absolutegiganten.org/wit Why not work together with Kay's tool: http://ehlo.org/~kay/gitweb.pl?project=linux-2.6&action=show

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:00:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly fo

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:20:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Ok, if you want some practice with "real" merges, feel free to merge from > > the following two trees whenever you are ready: > > ker

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:40:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'm still working out some performance issues with merges (the actual > "merge" operation itself is very fast, but I've been trying to make the > subsequent "update the working directory tree to the right thing" be much > better). O

Re: [script] ge: export commits as patches

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:03:20PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:48:43PM CEST, I got a letter > where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > is there any 'export commit as patch' support in git-pasky? I didnt find > > any such command (maybe it got

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:39:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches... > > Could you merge with: > kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/ Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just fin

Re: GIT Web Interface

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:32:42PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:52:48AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 02:52 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > Dear diary,

Re: GIT Web Interface

2005-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 02:52 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:44:15AM CEST, I got a letter > > where Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > > I'm hacking on a simple web interface, cause I

[GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches... Could you merge with: kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/ It contains 4 small patches, 2 i2c and 2 w1 bugfixes, diffstat is below, I'll figure out how to send the individual patches later. thanks, greg k-h drivers

Re: [PATCH] provide better committer information to commit-tree.c

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:52:30AM +1000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 17:45 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Well Russell has stated that he has to for EU Privacy reasons. And I'd > > like to do it as I don't have a local suse.de hostname for my laptop and

[GIT PATCH] USB updates for 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
Hm, I think I got this set up properly, but don't have an automated script to generate the changelog and diffstat messages yet, so bear with me... Could you merge with: kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6.git/ It should be against your latest git tree. It contains a number

Re: [PATCH] provide better committer information to commit-tree.c

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 05:31:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Here's a small patch to commit-tree.c that does two things: > > Gaah, I really was hoping that people wouldn't feel like they have to lie

[PATCH] provide better committer information to commit-tree.c

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
Here's a small patch to commit-tree.c that does two things: - allows the committer email address and name to be overridden by environment variables (if you don't like the environment variable names I've used (COMMIT_AUTHOR_NAME, COMMIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL), feel free

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:16:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Anyway, I try it this way and get: > > You should update to the newest version anyway.. > > > $ dotest ~/linux/patche

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:05:41PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:42:14AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:42:14AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Tools absolutely matter. And it will take time for us

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

2005-04-18 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Tools absolutely matter. And it will take time for us to build up that > kind of helper infrastructure. So being newbie might be part of it, but > it's the smaller part, I say. Rough interfaces is a big issue. Speaking of tools