On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Rich Fromm wrote:
> Nevertheless, I will try to contact Jeff and point him at this. My initial
> reading of his blog posts definitely gave me the impression that this was a
> --mirror vs. not issue, but it really sounds like his main problem was using
> --local.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The difference between --mirror and no --mirror is a red herring.
> You may want to ask Jeff Mitchell to remove the mention of it; it
> only adds to the confusion without helping users. If you made
> byte-for-byte cop
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:32:50PM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> For commit corruptions, the --no-hardlinks, non --mirror case refused
>> to create the new repository and exited with an error code of 128. The
>> --no-har
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:31:04PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > There are basically three levels of transport that can be used on a
>> > local machine:
>> >
>> > 1. Hard-linkin
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 08:01:33PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't have details on the KDE corruption, or why it wasn't detected
>> > (if it was one of the cases I me
5 matches
Mail list logo
