Dear all,
when going over my todo list I was confronted with the mail of Dan Shumow on
the successor of SHA-1 for git. I know the decision was made and it is not my
intention to change it, but please see below some comments on Dan's arguments.
In short, I argue below that SHA256 has no serious
Dear all,
I wanted to react to some statements I read in this discussion. But
first let me introduce myself. I'm Joan Daemen and I'm working in
symmetric cryptography since 1988. Vincent Rijmen and I designed
Rijndael that was selected to become AES and Guido Bertoni, Michael
Peeters and Gilles
Dear Johannes,
thanks for your response and taking the effort to express your concerns.
Please see below for some feedback.
On 30/09/17 00:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Joan,
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Joan Daemen wrote:
if ever there was a SHA-2 competition, it must have been held inside
://keccak.team/2017/open_source_crypto.html
Kind regards,
Joan Daemen
On 29/09/17 15:17, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Gilles,
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Gilles Van Assche wrote:
On 19/09/17 00:16, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
SHA-256 got much more cryptanalysis than SHA3-256 […].
I do not think
4 matches
Mail list logo
