Git devs,
Can I get a confirmation that someone has confirmed this as a bug?
And that it is in a queue somewhere for eventual fixing?
Thanks,
John Medema
Systems Administrator
United Drugs, a Subsidiary of AAP (American Associated Pharmacies)
john.med...@uniteddrugs.com
7243 N 16th Street
local vs
origin ) ).
But like I said before, I was hoping I'd have an easier time
convincing you guys on Options A or B to make the gui more consistent
with the cmdline.
Thanks,
John Medema
Systems Administrator
United Drugs, a Subsidiary of AAP (American Associated Pharmacies)
john.med...
, which is why I'm copying everything).
Sorry if I overloaded your monitor with all these characters, I'm
trying to anticipate responses. Thanks for your time,
John Medema
Systems Administrator
United Drugs, a Subsidiary of AAP (American Associated Pharmacies)
john.med...@uniteddrugs
Branch list as-is. However, on the Local Branch
screen, select include the existing branches in normal font but also
include potential local branches based off of the remote in italics
(or greyed-out, or asterisked, etc). Selecting an italicized entry
creates the new branch from the tracking branch,
n/develop] 2nd test file, just for develop branch
master c2b577c [origin/master] initial commit with test file
remotes/origin/develop 846504a 2nd test file, just for develop branch
remotes/origin/master c2b577c initial commit with test file
Let me know if you need any more information.
Joh
5 matches
Mail list logo