log: range_set_append: Assertion failed with -L:funcname:

2016-12-13 Thread Kevin Locke
n replies as I am not subscribed to this ML. -- Kevin Locke | ke...@kevinlocke.name| XMPP: ke...@kevinlocke.name | https://kevinlocke.name | IRC: kevinoid on freenode #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:58 #1 0x76fa040a in __GI_ab

git stash pop --quiet is not always quiet after save -u

2016-02-03 Thread Kevin Locke
Using git 2.7.0 or master (563e3849) apply/pop prints "Already up-to-date!" if the stash contains only untracked files. As an example: git init git commit --allow-empty -m init touch test.txt git stash -u Now that the stash contains only untracked files, applying it with either pop or apply prod

Re: git stash save -u deletes ignored files without stashing them

2016-02-03 Thread Kevin Locke
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 7:51, Michael Brade wrote: > Now node_modules will be deleted even though it was ignored at the time > of the "git stash save -u". Apparently .gitignore is reverted first, > then the cleanup is done taking the new state of .gitignore into account > where node_modules is now un