is if this is known issues (had mail issues,
so missed the last week or so's mail) ?
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 19:18 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:58:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Meaning, if they use a ',' in one of the fields (and it is a linux
system with the chfn most probably from
Hi,
This still applies - any reason for not doing this?
Thanks,
The GECOS is delimited by ',' or ';', so we should only use whatever is
before the first ',' or ';' for the full name, rather than just
stripping those.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
commit-tree.c
side, as you could
just do a cron to update it one a day/whatever.
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:31:43PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi,
Hi,
I understand why you have the git-pasky-0.6.x.tar.bz2 tarballs with
the .git database included
before it gets much later in the game.
Anyhow, suggestions/comments welcome.
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 22:29 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:21:58PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi,
Hi,
Just pulled linux-2.6.git, and got this:
New branch
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 12:50 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:05:10PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:28 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got
should
rather be fixed (had to patch postfix some time back for instance).
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
The gecos is delimited by ',' or ';', so we should only use whatever
before the first ',' or ';' for the full name, and not just strip those.
Also, a '.' may be valid in the full name (Foo B. Zooman) or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
commit
not sure which it is)
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in that case.
If we get the info from /etc/passwd, then we should just use whatever
before the first [,;] (see patch I posted earlier). If not, then I
think AUTHOR_* should be sane).
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to
me.
OT, and probably not much help, but glibc-2.3.5 is out ...
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 22:35 +1000, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:36 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
realgecos[strchr(realgecos, ',') - realgecos] = '\0';
Er, *strchr(realgecos, ',') = 0; surely? Even if the compiler is clever
enough to optimise out the gratuitous addition
-by: Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gittrack.sh: 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808
--- 03d6db1fb3a70605ef249c632c04e542457f0808/gittrack.sh
+++ uncommitted/gittrack.sh
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
read-tree $(tree-id $name)
gitdiff.sh local $name | gitapply.sh
+ update-cache
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:40:09AM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
(PS, can you check the fact that your mail client keeps on adding a 'Re:
' ...)
Hmm. I guess my ancient
16 matches
Mail list logo
