On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:11:10PM +1000, Jon Seymour wrote:
On 4/20/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I converted my git archives (kernel and git itself) to do the SHA1 hash
_before_ the compression phase.
Linus,
Am I correct to understand that with this change,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:30:15AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Hi,
your code looks pretty cool. thank you!
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Uecker wrote:
The other thing I don't like is the use of a sha1
for a complete file. Switching to some kind of hash
tree would allow to introduce
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:28:20AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Hi,
A merkle-tree (which I think you initially pointed me at) makes the hash
of the internal nodes be a hash of the chunk's hashes; ie not a straight
content hash. This is roughly what my current implementation does, but
I
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:11:00AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
The rsync approach does not use fixed chunk boundaries; this is necessary
to ensure good storage reuse for the expected case (ie; inserting a single
line
4 matches
Mail list logo
