This patch documents the behavior of 'git clean' when
encountering nested git repositories.
Such repositories are only deleted if '-f' is passed twice
to 'git clean'.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann
---
Documentation/git-clean.txt | 5 +
1 file changed,
Ping?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:46:55PM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> This patch documents the behavior of 'git clean' when
> encountering nested git repositories.
> Such repositories are only deleted if '-f' is passed twice
> to 'git clean&
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:01:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Soren Brinkmann writes:
>
> > Ping?
>
> I *think* it is a mistake for the command to remove a separate
> project repository within, with any number of "-f", so I'd rather
> see a pat
Hi,
this use case may be a little awkward but this is the behavior I see:
I have a repository which has a couple of untracked directories which can also
include git repositories. No submodules, though.
I used 'git clean -xdf' on the top level of this repo to remove everything
untracked in it - in
> Hi,
>
> this use case may be a little awkward but this is the behavior I see:
>
> I have a repository which has a couple of untracked directories which can also
> include git repositories. No submodules, though.
> I used 'git clean -xdf' on the top level of this repo to remove everything
> untrac
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:37:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Zoltan Klinger writes:
>
> > Only print out the names of the files and directories that got actually
> > deleted.
> >
> > Consider the following repo layout:
> > |-- test.git/
> > |-- foo/
> > |-- bar/
>
Hi Zoltan,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:18:19PM +1100, Zoltan Klinger wrote:
> >> Hrm, following your discussion (ellided above), I would have
> >> expected that you would show
> >>
> >> Removing directory foo/bar
> >> Removing untracked_file1
> >
> > Also it would be nice to have warnings a
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:04:59PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Zoltan Klinger writes:
>
> > Would like to get some more feedback on the proposed output in case of
> > (1) an untracked subdirectory with multiple files where at least one of
> > them
> > cannot be removed.
> > (2) r
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:03:28AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Soren Brinkmann writes:
>
> >> > Use git clean --force --force to delete all untracked git repositories
> >>
> >> But I am not sure if this is ever sane. Especially the one that
> >>
Since recent documentation uses terms like 'staged' and 'staging area',
--staged is more in line with other documentation and to be pfeferred
over --cached.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann
---
Documentation/git-diff.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deleti
Add email addresses from additional commonly used tags to the CC-list of
patches. Additional tags are:
- Acked-by
- Reviewed-by
- Tested-by
- Reported-by
- Reviewed-and-tested-by
--suppress-cc=ack suppresses these additional CCs.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann
---
Documentation/git-send
11 matches
Mail list logo