ting static bundle files as a
mechanism to seed a repository?
I would also appreciate any pointers to other discussions in this area.
Best regards,
Stefan Saasen & Erik van Zijst; Atlassian Bitbucket
Perhaps companies like Atlassian that rely on the stability of the
open source Git can spare some resources and join forces with like
minded folks on LTS of older maintenance tracks, if they are truly
interested in.
We certainly can and would like to. I'm not entirely sure what that
would
I've noticed Peff's patches on pu which suggest they will be available
in git 2.5?
Being on 'pu' (or 'next' for that matter) is not a suggestion for a
change to appear in any future version at all, even though it often
means that it would soon be merged to 'master' and will be in the
are mostly
packed, this means we will make a lot of extra access()
system calls checking for loose objects. We should follow
the same packed-then-loose order that all of our other
lookups use.
Reported-by: Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff King p...@peff.net
I can confirm that this patch is equivalent to the previous one.
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/ssaasen/9AXg shows both the timing and
the NFS stats showing the effect of applying this patch.
Thanks for the fix Jeff!
Cheers,
Stefan
On 21 April 2015 at 05:55, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
If it is critical to some people, they can downmerge to their custom
old installations of Git they maintain with ease, of course, and
that with ease part is the reason why I try to apply fixes to tip
of the original topic branch even though they were merged to the
mainline eons ago ;-).
I
).
http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg240106.html discusses a potential
improvement for this case. Would that be an acceptable avenue to
improve this situation?
Best regards,
Stefan Saasen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord
If it's not a problem, I'd love to see timings for your case with just
the first patch, and then with both.
Thanks for the swift response, much appreciated Jeff!
Here are the timings for the two patches:
Patch 1 on top of 33d4221c79
Elapsed System User
Min.
On 18 November 2014 08:34, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
I am not sure if this much of code churn is warranted to work around
issues that only happen on repositories on NFS servers that do not
keep open-but-deleted files available. Is it an option to instead
have a copy of repository
On 15 November 2014 10:01, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
23 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
I am not sure if this much of code churn is warranted to work around
issues that only happen on repositories on NFS servers that do not
keep open-but-deleted files
In any case, adding value to the existing process is hard (because it
works quite well!) and probably requires significantly more work to
even understand what that value might look like. This, I think, is the
key reason it is hard to truly get started with any bug tracking
solution; the
.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com wrote:
DiffMerge is a non-free (but gratis) tool that supports OS X, Windows and
Linux.
See http://www.sourcegear.com/diffmerge/
DiffMerge includes a script `/usr/bin/diffmerge` that can be used to launch
the
graphical
'diffmerge' as an
option to the mergetool help.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com
Acked-by: David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 +-
git-mergetool--lib.sh | 3 ++-
mergetools/diffmerge | 15 +++
3
'diffmerge' as an
option to the mergetool help.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com
Acked-by: David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 +-
git-mergetool--lib.sh | 3 ++-
mergetools/diffmerge | 15 +++
3
,
Stefan
On 6 October 2013 14:21, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com wrote:
DiffMerge is a non-free (but gratis) tool that supports OS X, Windows and
Linux.
See http://www.sourcegear.com/diffmerge/
DiffMerge
'diffmerge' as an
option to the mergetool help.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 +-
git-mergetool--lib.sh | 2 +-
mergetools/diffmerge | 15 +++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2
The help text for the `tool` flag should mention:
--tool=tool
instead of:
--tool-tool
Signed-off-by: Stefan Saasen ssaa...@atlassian.com
---
git-mergetool--lib.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/git-mergetool--lib.sh b/git-mergetool--lib.sh
index
17 matches
Mail list logo
