Hi,
When ever I make a commit (assume I'm changing a single file) and do a
'git push origin master', git says 'Counting objects: 6, done.'
Does git makes 6 objects everytime? What are those objects?
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" i
to build this I need to have libcurl, but libcurl is a MONSTER
> library with an enormous number of prerequisites (see below).
>
I think Git would have to be changed to use raw sockets and implement
everything it needs on top of that, like libgit2 already does. Certainly this
won't be a trivi
The same logic you apply to CURLOPT_FILE - CURLOPT_WRITEDATA?
Bye!
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
Is it right that git uses libcurl to download while libgit2 does without it?
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
with the
reviewers' feedback incorporated. For me that is the most tricky and
hard part to get right, specially when using GMail as an email client.
How do you handle that part of the process?
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, sending email is the easiest part.
The hard begins when you have to edit your patch and resend with the
reviewers' feedback incorporated
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com writes:
In imap-send.c:socket_perror() we pass |func| as a parameter, which I
think it is the name of the function that called socket_perror, or
the name of the function which generated
Hi,
Do we leak the context we allocate in imap-send.c:280 intentionally?
Regards,
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A
(unless user B is root).
Update the test to recognize an EPERM error as meaning the process
exists and another gc should not be run (unless --force is given).
Looks like you are missing your Signed-off-by: line.
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git
May be because they (LKM) are more open to such architectural and
organization refactorings?
Some maintainers, like Greg Kroah-Hartman and possibly others accept
clean up patches, such thing seems to be unacceptable here on git.
Looks like there is space here only for features and bug fixes.
Hi,
When I want to revert a change to a file that is already committed
what is the best way?
The way I found was:
$ git checkout HEAD /path/to/my/file
$ git reset HEAD /path/to/my/file
Is this the canonical/best way or there other (easier-faster) ways?
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I suggest a separate patch series dedicated to deleting *all* the extra
imap infrastructure at once. That being said, I'm not committing to do
so. (We could add it to an straightforward projects for aspiring git
Hi Joao,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Joao Vitor P. Moraes jvl...@gmail.com wrote:
Inside gitk there's a checkbox which says:
Ignore space change
It was translated to portuguese (pt-br) as:
Ignorar mudanças de caixa
But that message in portuguese means:
Ignore case changes
that
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Requiring everyone to use a web browser would limit the amount of ways
people can review patches.
I don't see that as a limitation as I think everyone has access to a
web browser these days, don't have?
How
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Deniz Türkoglu de...@spotify.com wrote:
This is my first mail to the git mailing list. I have been following
the list for some time now and I would like to suggest moving the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
clang reported this:
combine-diff.c:1006:19: warning: adding 'int' to a string does not
append to the string [-Wstring-plus-int]
prefix = COLONS + offset;
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Andrew Wong andrew.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/08/12 17:36, Thiago Farina wrote:
OK, after running ./configure I tried the make command again.
CC credential-store.o
/bin/sh: clang: not found
make: *** [credential-store.o] Error 127
$ which clang
/home
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Andrew Wong
andrew.kw.w.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/11/12 16:54, Thiago Farina wrote:
Just setting CC to gcc works for me. But still, I'd like to be able to
build with clang (may be as you noted is just something with the + in
my PATH).
Oh, I just realized
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Wong andrew.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/07/12 20:39, Thiago Farina wrote:
When trying to build from source but it's failing:
$ sudo make prefix=/usr/local all
LINK git
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes wildmatch.c part of libgit.a and builds test-wildmatch; the
dependency on libpopt in the original has been replaced with the use
of our parse-options. Global variables in test-wildmatch are marked
static
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
We could introduce exclude_path() and kill path_excluded() then. There
are just about 5-6 call
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Yes.
Hence does not make sense to ask git to do push origin master while
inside feature-work branch.
No. As long as you know your master is ready and suitable to be
published when you ask push, the command perfectly
Hi,
How can I push a working branch to github inside it?
E.g:
# On master:
$ git checkout -b feature-work
# On feature-work
# vi, hack, commit, ready to push
$ git push origin master # here I expected it would working pushing my
commits to a feature-work branch in github. Or if I omit master
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com writes:
How can I push a working branch to github inside it?
E.g:
# On master:
$ git checkout -b feature-work
# On feature-work
# vi, hack, commit, ready to push
$ git push
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, PJ Weisberg
p...@irregularexpressions.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm looking for is to upload/create the remote branch in github
from inside my local branch, without having to checkout master
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
There may be a hosting site with better code review features, but
all the code review of Git happens on this mailing list, and that is
not likely to change in the near future.
For me, you know, it's codereview, aka
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:18 AM, J. Bakshi
joydeep.bak...@infoservices.in wrote:
Or any repo wise configuration file where I can save the info, so that
it doesn't ask the credential before every push ?
I'd like to know how to do that too.
It's a pain to have to type username and password every
27 matches
Mail list logo
