Adding Peff to cc as he is the current maintainer of the git-scm.com site/repo.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Lijin wrote:
>
> I've taken the liberty of classifying them as shown below.
>
As a community member who cares a lot about that site, thank you! I
would love
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> In more technical matters, you may be interested in:
>
> https://github.com/blog/2053-easier-feeds-for-github-pages
>
> I don't know of any problems with the current RSS solution, but 1 line
> of code maintained by somebody
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
tfn...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope we can attract more contributors in the future, so the weight
of this doesn't lie too much on his shoulders. Perhaps we should send
out the draft earlier next time, and beckon for more contributions
from
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Mikael Magnusson mika...@gmail.com wrote:
It is surprisingly difficult to get to the actual post of edition 6
from this thread. The link in the original post is just a 404, and to
get to it from the link in this mail, which you might not have sent at
all, I had
Dear all,
I'm happy announce that the 6th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
http://git.github.io/rev_news/2015/08/05/edition-6/
Big thanks to the contributors!
Cheers,
Thomas, Christian and Nicola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I hope we can attract more contributors in the future, so the weight
of this doesn't lie too much on his shoulders. Perhaps we should send
out the draft earlier next time, and beckon for more contributions
from the list.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Thanks; it seems that the review section is rather thin. No new and
interesting changes worth reviewing in the entire month of July?
Of course there are, but I can only put in a few hours, and that goes
into the
Hi,
A draft of Git Rev News edition 6 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-6.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section, either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub issue:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the non-ASCII characters
in Duy's name got corrupted, and the botch is present in the patch I
sent. Sorry. Not sure how that happened. Can you fix it locally?
Fixed [1].
[1]
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Rossella Barletta
rossella.barle...@gmail.com wrote:
So summarizing:
1) Git repository (bare) is on Windows on a shared folder
2) Clone of the repository is on Linux
3) Clone of the repository is on windows
4) I received a bundle made starting by a
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Mustafa Kerim Yılmaz mkys...@gmail.com wrote:
I try to download from this url:
https://github.com/msysgit/msysgit/releases/download/Git-1.9.5-preview20150319/Git-1.9.5-preview20150319.exe
It is redirect to amazon aws with url but not responsed:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
Perhaps someone here would prefer to use my gist when
redirecting people with user questions away from this list, or
inspire them to write better bug reports
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
As to better bug reports, I often find people pointing others to
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
Thanks, I've added it to the gist. It is already linked on
http://git-scm.com/community .
--
To
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
A draft of Git Rev News edition 2 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/draft/edition-2.md
There's also a secret live preview here now:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
I wanted to make one more announcement about this, since a few more
details have been posted at:
http://git-merge.com/
since my last announcement. Specifically, I wanted to call attention to
the contributor's summit on the
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:21 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Kastrup (dak at gnu.org) previously reimplemented significant
parts of git blame for a vast gain in performance with complex
histories and large files. As working on free software is his sole
source of
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Thanks.
The most important question I would ask you is this:
Did you two enjoy writing it?
To be clear, apart from some minor wording and nitpicking, I only
contributed the links from outside the list. This is an
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote something about a potential Git Rev News news letter:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/15
I would love to have/use something like this in the GitMinutes
podcast. Perhaps in addition to the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Siamak Nooraei siamakn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am taking an online data science course for which I am required to
download Git.
When I go to the Git's site, I can only download Git 2.2.1 Maverick. Also,
when I check in my CLI, it says git version
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:00 AM, James purplei...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a patch to add a much needed option to the bash completion
script. I'm not subscribed to this list, so please include me in your
reply if you'd like me to see your response.
Please read the guide on how to submit patches
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Henning Sprang
henning.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
You'd say, can happen, when some developers work against the remote
git repo, others with svn. But I'm the only developer on the project,
and no one ever commits to the remote svn nor the remote git repo. So,
I'm
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Robert Dailey rcdailey.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it safe to do this while still using git svn fetch? Will it
properly continue to convert SVN commits on top of my rewritten
history? If not, what changes can I make after I run the commands
linked by the URL
This was discussed on the Git user list recently [1].
#in a repo with no files
git add -A
fatal: pathspec '.' did not match any files
The same goes for git add . (and -u).
Whereas I think some warning feedback is useful, we are curious
whether this is an intentional change or not.
[1]
I've recently been forced back into using git-svn, and while I was at
it, I noticed that git-svn generally behaves a lot better when it is
initialized using the --prefix option.
For example, I make a standard-layout svn clone:
$ git svn clone -s https://svn.company.com/repos/project-foo/
.. and
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
But my main point is that I think it would be easier to phase out
contrib/ if there were a good alternate way of providing visibility to
satellite projects. The relevant Git wiki page [1] is the most likely
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Philippe Vaucher
philippe.vauc...@gmail.com wrote:
On the git-users mailing list we're trying someone to help with
running `git push` over FTP. That person is runnig Git 1.7.9.5
on Ubuntu 12.04.
I don't think vanilla git supports pushing over ftp.
At
26 matches
Mail list logo