On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
fine. It looks good from my inspection:
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@tilera.com
Thanks; Acked-by
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
(i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the change
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:48 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
Groan ... as well you should.
My tree has re-appeared now. Thanks to whoever fixed it.
I noticed similar effects recently. Its related to the mirroring of
master.kernel.org to the public server. At some point you have only the
half of
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 10:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So I'd _almost_ suggest just starting from a clean slate after all.
Keeping the old history around, of course, but not necessarily putting it
into git now. It would just force everybody who is getting used to git in
the first place
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 20:32 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 09:23:40PM CEST, I got a letter
where Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
One remark on the tree blob storage format.
The binary storage of the sha1sum of the refered object is a PITA
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 11:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
That level of abstraction (we never look directly at the objects) is
what allows us to change the object structure later. For example, we
already changed the commit date thing once, and the tree object has
obviously evolved a bit,
Hi,
I can publish the stuff on monday from a university nearby.
---
total blob objects = 228384
total tree objects = 172507
total commit objects = 55877
The empty changesets which are noting merges are omitted at the
moment. Is it of interest to include them ??
It might also be
7 matches
Mail list logo
