> However you're
> right that the original structure proposed by Linus is too flat.
That was the only point I *meant* to defend. The rest was error.
-t
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
> Tom, please stop this ext* filesystem bashing ;-)
For one thing... yes, i'm totally embarassed on this issue.
I made a late-night math error in a spec. *hopefully* would
have noticed it on my own as I coded to that spec but y'all
have been wonderful at pointing out my mistake to me even
> [your 0:3/4:7 directory hierarchy is horked]
Absolutely. Made a dumb mistake the night I wrote that spec
and embarassed that I initially defended it. I had an arithmetic
error. Thanks, this time, for your persistence in pointing it out.
-t
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> Yes, it really doesn't make much sense to have so big keys on the
> directories.
It's official... i'm blushing wildly thank you for the various
replies that pointed out my thinko.
That part of my spec hasn't been coded yet --- i just wrote text. It
really was the silly late-night e
> Using your suggested indexing method that uses [0:4] as the 1st level key
and
[0:3]
> [4:8] as the 2nd level key, I obtain an indexed archive that occupies 159M,
> where the top level contains 18665 1st level keys, the largest first level
(I'll have to study/think about that for a while before a proper
reply. Tomorrow, probably.)
Thanks,
-t
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your experiment. I'm not surprised by the
result but it is very nice to know that my expectations
are right.
I think that to a large extent you are seeing artifacts
of the questionable trade-offs that (reports tell me) the
ext* filesystems make. Wit
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> I think you have made a mistake by moving the sha1 checksum from the
> zipped form to the inflated form. Here is why:
I'd have agreed with you (and I did, violently)
Linus,
I think you have made a mistake by moving the sha1 checksum from the
zipped form to the inflated form. Here is why:
What you have set in motion with `git' is an ad-hoc p2p network for
sharing filesystem trees -- a global distributed filesystem. I
believe your starter here has a good c
`git', by Linus Torvalds, contains some very good ideas and some
very entertaining source code -- recommended reading for hackers.
/GNU Arch/ will adopt `git':
>From the /Arch/ perspective: `git' technology will form the
basis of a new archive/revlib/cache format and the basis
of new network tra
`git', by Linus Torvalds, contains some very good ideas and some
very entertaining source code -- recommended reading for hackers.
/GNU Arch/ will adopt `git':
>From the /Arch/ perspective: `git' technology will form the
basis of a new archive/revlib/cache format and the basis
of new network tra
11 matches
Mail list logo
