On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
This raises the question why we read via mmap at all
The first version of the pack bitmap format I wrote for GitHub was 50%
faster to load than this one because it was designed to be mmapable.
Eventually we moved to the
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Since time is short, I already started on this. I wrote a first draft
of an introduction for the students. I also started looking for
microprojects. I started going through our source files alphabetically,
and
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Git has been accepted to this year's Google
Summer of Code.
Student proposals will start coming in on March 22. In the meantime
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Thomas Rast t...@thomasrast.ch wrote:
Replace object loading/writing layer by libgit2
Git reads objects from storage (loose and packed) through functions in
sha1_file.c. Most commands only require very simple, opaque read and
write access to the object
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/ewah/ewah_io.c
+++ b/ewah/ewah_io.c
@@ -112,23 +112,38 @@ int ewah_serialize(struct ewah_bitmap *self, int fd)
[...]
+#if __BYTE_ORDER != __BIG_ENDIAN
Is this portable?
We explicitly set the __BYTE_ORDER
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Siddharth Agarwal s...@fb.com wrote:
Yes, we'd prefer to do that too. How do you actually do this, though? I
don't see a way to pass `--honor-pack-keep` (shouldn't I pass in its
inverse?) down to `git-pack-objects`.
We run with this patch in production, it may
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Näwe stefan.na...@atlas-elektronik.com writes:
Am 22.01.2014 13:53, schrieb Javier Domingo Cansino:
Will there be any change on how tarballs are distributed, taking into
account that Google will be shutting down
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Do we want to try this in 'next' post-1.8.5, or should I try to prod an
area expert like Shawn into doing another round of review?
Yes ;-).
I recall starting to read the series over and then got sidetracked
in the
Thank you Ramsay, all the patches look OK to me.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:58:02PM +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
These patches fix various errors/warnings on the cygwin, MinGW and
msvc builds, provoked by the jk/pack-bitmap branch.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
The following first aid hot fix works for me:
/Torsten
If Cygwin declares its own bswap_64, wouldn't it be better to use it
instead of overwriting it with our own?
--
On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
typo: ntohll
Thanks.
function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
swaps of 64-bit
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
jk/pack-bitmap adds khash.h, which from a first glance looks like yet
another hash table implementation. I was just wondering if kb's new
hash tables can cover the need of pack-bitmap.c too so we can remove
khash.h
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
The new `hashmap.c` covers the first case quite well (albeit slightly
more verbosely than I'd like), but in the second case it doesn't quite
work. Since the new hash needs to embed the struct hashmap_entry on
all its
That was a very rude reply. :(
Please refrain from interacting with me in the ML in the future. I'l
do accordingly.
Thanks!
vmg
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Vicent Martí tan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Peter Krefting pe...@softwolves.pp.se wrote:
endian(3) claims that glibc 2.9+ define be64toh() and htobe64() which should
do what you are looking for. The manual page does mention them being named
differently across OSes, though, so you may need to be careful
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org wrote:
I very much hate seeing a file format that is supposed to be portable
that supports both big-endian and little-endian encoding.
Well, the bitmap index is not supposed to be portable, as it doesn't
get sent over the wire in
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
What case are you talking about?
The n-th object must be one of these four types and can never be of
more than one type at the same time, so a natural expectation from
the reader is If you OR them together, you will get
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
This is the technical documentation and design rationale for the new
Bitmap v2 on-disk format.
Hrmpf, that's what I get for reading the series in order...
+ The folowing flags are supported:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
After this, the function returns. The original did not add to the
table the object name we are looking at, but the new code first adds
it to the table with the unconditional kh_put_sha1() above. Is a
call to
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
@@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ static struct progress *progress_state;
static int pack_compression_level = Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION;
static int pack_compression_seen;
+static int bitmap_support;
+static int use_bitmap_index;
OK.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
@@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ do
fullbases=$fullbases pack-$name
chmod a-w $PACKTMP-$name.pack
chmod a-w $PACKTMP-$name.idx
+
+ test -f $PACKTMP-$name.bitmap
+ chmod a-w $PACKTMP-$name.bitmap
+
I'm afraid I cannot reproduce the segfault locally (assuming you're
performing the rev-list on the git/git repository). Could you please
send me more information, and a core dump if possible?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Vicent Marti tan...@gmail.com
22 matches
Mail list logo
