Re: [RFC for GIT] pull-request: add praise to people doing QA

2017-01-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > I didn't know about trailers before. As I undestand it, I could use > > "Tested-by" as the key, and the commit subject as the value. This list > > then could be parsed and brought into proper output shape. It would > > simplify the subject parsing, but most things my AWK script currently > > d

Re: [RFC for GIT] pull-request: add praise to people doing QA

2017-01-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> So the idea is to have list of those whose names appear on > Reviewed-by: and Tested-by: collected and listed after the list of > commit titles and author names. I personally do not see much > downsides in doing so, but I do not consume that many PRs myself, so > let's hear from those who actua

[RFC for GIT] pull-request: add praise to people doing QA

2017-01-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
odebase, I have to admit that I simply patched around in /usr/lib/git-core of my Debian machine :) So much for now, let me know what you think, Wolfram [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/15/55 Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- git-praise-qa.awk | 33 + git-reque

[PATCH] request-pull: drop old USAGE stuff

2017-01-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
request-pull uses OPTIONS_SPEC, so no need for (meanwhile incomplete) USAGE and LONG_USAGE anymore. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- git-request-pull.sh |3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) Index: git-2.11.0/git-request-pull.sh