On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:52:21PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> > Yeah, adding a "%C(enable-auto-color)" or something would be backwards
>> > compatible and less painful than using "%C(auto)" everywhere. I do
>> > wonder if
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:52:21PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > Yeah, adding a "%C(enable-auto-color)" or something would be backwards
> > compatible and less painful than using "%C(auto)" everywhere. I do
> > wonder if anybody actually _wants_ the "always show color, even if
> > --no-color"
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 04:26:18PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> > If we do a revamp of the pretty-formats to bring them more in line with
>> > ref-filter (e.g., something like "%(color:red)") maybe that would be an
>> >
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:52:47PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > I like the intent here, though I found "Values, color" hard to parse (it
> > was not immediately clear that you mean "the color paragraph of the
> > Values section", as commas are already being used in that sentence for
> > the
Am 10.10.2016 um 01:46 schrieb Jeff King:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
>> b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
>> index a942d57..89e3bc6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
>> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ endif::git-rev-list[]
>> -
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 04:26:18PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > If we do a revamp of the pretty-formats to bring them more in line with
> > ref-filter (e.g., something like "%(color:red)") maybe that would be an
> > opportunity to make minor adjustments. Though, hmm, it looks like
> >
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 03:24:17PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> Offering a way to enable terminal-detection for all color codes of a
>> format would be useful, but using the existing "auto," prefix for that
>> would be a
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 03:24:17PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Offering a way to enable terminal-detection for all color codes of a
> format would be useful, but using the existing "auto," prefix for that
> would be a behaviour change that could surprise users.
Yeah. In retrospect, it probably
Am 09.10.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Tom Hale:
> On 2016-10-09 13:47, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> %Cgreen emits color codes unconditionally. %C(auto,green) would respect
>> the config settings.
>
> Thanks, I've never seen the (,) syntax documented before!
Both the prefix "auto," for terminal-detection
On 2016-10-09 13:47, René Scharfe wrote:
%Cgreen emits color codes unconditionally. %C(auto,green) would respect
the config settings.
Thanks, I've never seen the (,) syntax documented before!
What's strange is that this works:
%C(auto,green bold)
but
%C(auto,green,bold)
does not.
Also:
Am 09.10.2016 um 07:43 schrieb Tom Hale:
$ ~/repo/git/git --version
git version 2.10.0.GIT
The `git-log` man page says:
`auto` alone (i.e. %C(auto)) will turn on auto coloring on the next
placeholders until the color is switched again.
In this example:
http://i.imgur.com/y3yLxk7.png
I turn
$ ~/repo/git/git --version
git version 2.10.0.GIT
The `git-log` man page says:
`auto` alone (i.e. %C(auto)) will turn on auto coloring on the next
placeholders until the color is switched again.
In this example:
http://i.imgur.com/y3yLxk7.png
I turn on auto colouring for green, but it
12 matches
Mail list logo