Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-23 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Wink, On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Wink Saville wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 10:32 AM Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > I now have a version 3: "[RFC PATCH v3 0/9] rebase-interactive:" Great! > Cheers, > Winthrop Lyon Saville III (I had to repsond with my full name

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-22 Thread Wink Saville
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 10:32 AM Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi Wink, > > > Please see "[RFC PATCH 0/3] rebase-interactive" and > > "[RFC PATCH v2 0/1] rebase-interactive: ...". I'm looking for > > advice on how to proceed. > > Sadly, I had almost no time to spend

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Wink, On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Wink Saville wrote: > I plead guilty to being the preson refactoring --preserve-merges. But > after reading this and seeing that --recreate-merges is coming and > possibly git-rebase--* moving to C I'm worried I'd be messing things up. Don't worry. We will just

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-21 Thread Wink Saville
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Note! There is one exception, and it is not even a full script. As > everybody knows who follows my patch series on this here mailing list, I > consider --preserve-merges one of my stupidest

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-21 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Paul, On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Paul Sebastian Ungureanu wrote: > I am interested in the "Convert scripts to builtins" project. I have > recently started to analyze it better and see exactly what it entails > and a few questions came to my mind. Great! > First of all, I find it difficult to pick

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-19 Thread Christian Couder
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Paul Sebastian Ungureanu >> First of all, I find it difficult to pick which scripts would benefit >> the most by being rewritten. I am thinking of git bisect, git stash >> and

Re: [GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-19 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Paul Sebastian Ungureanu wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested in the "Convert scripts to builtins" project. I have > recently started to analyze it better and see exactly what it entails > and a few questions came to my mind.

[GSoC] Regarding "Convert scripts to builtins"

2018-03-18 Thread Paul Sebastian Ungureanu
Hello, I am interested in the "Convert scripts to builtins" project. I have recently started to analyze it better and see exactly what it entails and a few questions came to my mind. First of all, I find it difficult to pick which scripts would benefit the most by being rewritten. I am thinking