On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not my first patch that gets rejected, but it's the first one
that gets rejected by Junio without even looking at it. What is
anybody supposed to think about that?
My very humble opinion: submit again
Felipe Contreras wrote:
git-rebase.rb | 2056
+
1 file changed, 2056 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 git-rebase.rb
I suggest putting this in contrib/ and cooking it. As usual, my
mantra is: let the patches decide what to do. I'll
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
git-rebase.rb | 2056
+
1 file changed, 2056 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 git-rebase.rb
I suggest putting this in contrib/
Felipe Contreras wrote:
I think that's the only way forward, since the Git project doesn't
wish to be improved.
Perhaps it's time for me to create a pseudonym, and when you have to
do that to land clearly good patches, you know something is *REALLY*
wrong with the project.
I ask only for
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
I think that's the only way forward, since the Git project doesn't
wish to be improved.
Perhaps it's time for me to create a pseudonym, and when you have to
do that to land clearly good
Ignore this patch. I was using this to test and improve 'git rebase', and I was
using the lessons learned to improve 'git rebase' shell script.
I was planning it to clean it even more, and simplify it using tricks specific
to Ruby.
But no more.
There's no point in trying to improve 'git
6 matches
Mail list logo
