Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think you can shrink and enhance the above repertoire at the same
> time by separating "do I want to have stash and stash pop around"
> bit into an orthogonal axis. The other orthogonal axes are "Under
> what condition do I integrate the work from the upstream?" (e.g.
> "
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
>
>> I usually use `git fetch`, inspect state, and then merge/ rebase
>> accordingly. Unfortunately, this is very sub-optimal as I can
>> automate this 80% of the time. I want to be able to decide what to do
>> on a repository-specific basis,
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> I usually use `git fetch`, inspect state, and then merge/ rebase
> accordingly. Unfortunately, this is very sub-optimal as I can
> automate this 80% of the time. I want to be able to decide what to do
> on a repository-specific basis, and hence propose a pull.defa
3 matches
Mail list logo
