On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
>>> So, we have around a 1.4x-1.8x speedup for Linux users, and a 1.7x-13x
>>> speedup
>>> for Windows
Hi Duy,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
>
> > rebase-am.c| 110 +++
> > rebase-am.h| 22 +++
> > rebase-common.c| 220
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
>> So, we have around a 1.4x-1.8x speedup for Linux users, and a 1.7x-13x
>> speedup
>> for Windows users. The annoying long delay before the interactive editor is
>> launched on
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
>> So, we have around a 1.4x-1.8x speedup for Linux users, and a 1.7x-13x
>> speedup
>> for Windows users. The annoying long delay before the interactive
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
> So, we have around a 1.4x-1.8x speedup for Linux users, and a 1.7x-13x speedup
> for Windows users. The annoying long delay before the interactive editor is
> launched on Windows is gotten rid of, which I'm very happy about
Hi all,
Last year I rewrote git-am from shell script to C. This succeeded in speeding
up a non-interactive git-rebase by 6-7x[1], which is really handly when rebasing
multiple topic branches.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/271967
However, it turns out that when
6 matches
Mail list logo