Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:26:18PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote: >> This doesn't occur on a non-parallel build. > > It does occur in non-parallel builds, too. > > See: > > >

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote: > When running make -j$(nproc) with the current pu f9f8c1f765 > (Merge branch 'hn/bisect-first-parent' into pu) I see the > following error: > > GIT_VERSION = 2.17.0.732.gf9f8c1f765 > * new build flags > * new

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

Hello, When running make -j$(nproc) with the current pu f9f8c1f765 (Merge branch 'hn/bisect-first-parent' into pu) I see the following error: GIT_VERSION = 2.17.0.732.gf9f8c1f765 * new build flags * new prefix flags GEN common-cmds.h * new link flags CC ident.o CC hex.o

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

From: "Duy Nguyen" On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Philip Oakley wrote: > Is that something I should add to my todo to add a 'guide' category > > etc.? I added it too [1]. Not sure if you want anything more on top though. What I've seen is

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Philip Oakley wrote: >>> > Is that something I should add to my todo to add a 'guide' category > >>> > etc.? >>> >>> I added it too [1]. Not sure if you want anything more on top though. > > > What I've seen is looking good - I've not had as

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

From: "Philip Oakley" : Tuesday, April 17, 2018 11:47 PM From: "Duy Nguyen" : Tuesday, April 17, 2018 5:48 PM On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: >

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

From: "Duy Nguyen" : Tuesday, April 17, 2018 5:48 PM On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Duy Nguyen" : Saturday, April 14, 2018 4:44 > PM > >>

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > > From: "Duy Nguyen" : Saturday, April 14, 2018 4:44 PM > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Philip Oakley

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Duy Nguyen" : Saturday, April 14, 2018 4:44 PM > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Philip Oakley >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm only just catching up, but does/can this

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

From: "Duy Nguyen" : Saturday, April 14, 2018 4:44 PM On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Philip Oakley wrote: I'm only just catching up, but does/can this series also capture the non-command guides that are available in git so that the 'git help -g' can

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Philip Oakley wrote: > I'm only just catching up, but does/can this series also capture the > non-command guides that are available in git so that the 'git help -g' can > begin to list them all? It currently does not. But I don't see why it

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

From: "Eric Sunshine" Monday, April 09, 2018 6:17 AM On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: This is pretty rough but I'd like to see how people feel about this first. I notice we have two places for command classification.

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > This is pretty rough but I'd like to see how people feel about this > first. > > I notice we have two places for command classification. One in > command-list.txt, one in __git_list_porcelain_commands() in >

[PATCH/RFC 0/5] Keep all info in command-list.txt in git binary

This is pretty rough but I'd like to see how people feel about this first. I notice we have two places for command classification. One in command-list.txt, one in __git_list_porcelain_commands() in git-completion.bash. People who are following nd/parseopt-completion probably know that I'm try to