On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:14:26AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Coupled with using compression level 0 for trees (which do not compress
well at all, and yield only
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:14:26AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
This is the cleaned-up version of the commit caching patches I mentioned
here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/212329
...
The
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
This is the cleaned-up version of the commit caching patches I mentioned
here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/212329
...
The short of it is that for an extra 31M of disk
space (~4%), I get a warm-cache
This is the cleaned-up version of the commit caching patches I mentioned
here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/212329
The basic idea is to generate a cache file that sits alongside a
packfile and contains the timestamp, tree, and parents in a more compact
and
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
The timings from this one are roughly similar to what I posted earlier.
Unlike the earlier version, this one keeps the data for a single commit
together for better cache locality (though I don't think it made a big
difference in
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:31:43AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
The timings from this one are roughly similar to what I posted earlier.
Unlike the earlier version, this one keeps the data for a single commit
together for
6 matches
Mail list logo