On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
In other words, now the Git user and developer community are strong
and thriving,
we should strive to make the core smaller, not larger, and encourage people
to
form more third party
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:00:44PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
- Moving away from higher-level scripting languages such as shell and Perl.
Recent clean --interactive may have added some code that could be
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:29 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
Now, if anybody has ideas into how the bindings could
Hello Felipe,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote:
And see my humble test of what the speedup would be for git-submodule
even with a faulty lua integration (still
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Patrick Donnelly batr...@batbytes.com wrote:
Hello Felipe,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote:
And see my humble test of what the
Junio C Hamano wrote:
[on vacaion, with only gmail webmail UI; please excuse me if this message
comes
out badly formatted or gets dropped by vger.kernel.org]
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:56 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0500,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but that's not what the words said, the words said 'lua
integration' and 'ruby integration' would take that much. Either way
it doesn't matter, shared libraries exist for a reason. We don't need
to
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Patrick Donnelly batr...@batbytes.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but that's not what the words said, the words said 'lua
integration' and 'ruby integration' would take that much. Either way
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:36:51AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I think it's a bad idea to introduce an entirely new runtime, especially
one known to occasionally blow up on less-common architectures, without
some advance notice.
This is just FUD. What do you mean blow up on less-common
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:36:51AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I think it's a bad idea to introduce an entirely new runtime, especially
one known to occasionally blow up on less-common architectures, without
some
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:43:39AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It would actually be usefull to know stats on where git is runned. In my
world of embedded computing, ruby support definitely isn't a standard,
nor is glibc.
I come from the embedded world as well, and I've never seen Git
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:43:39AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It would actually be usefull to know stats on where git is runned. In my
world of embedded computing, ruby support definitely isn't a standard,
nor is
[on vacaion, with only gmail webmail UI; please excuse me if this message comes
out badly formatted or gets dropped by vger.kernel.org]
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:56 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:00:44PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
- Moving away from higher-level scripting languages such as shell and Perl.
Recent clean --interactive may have added some code that could be
reused for a rewrite of add -i (which I think is in Perl), for example.
The
Hi,
It was discussed before that there was a need to replace Git scripts from perl
and sh that utilize the 'git' binary to do everything they need, which requires
many forks, and that creates problems on platforms like Windows.
This is a first step meant to show how a solution using Ruby would
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
It was discussed before that there was a need to replace Git scripts
from perl and sh that utilize the 'git' binary to do everything they
need, which requires many forks, and that creates problems on
platforms like
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:29 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
It was discussed before that there was a need to replace Git scripts
from perl and sh that utilize the 'git' binary to do everything they
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:29 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
As Junio has also pointed out in the past, there are people who aren't
able to use Ruby in the same way that they are Perl and Python. If
brian m. carlson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:29 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
As Junio has also pointed out in the past, there are people who aren't
able to use Ruby in the same way that
19 matches
Mail list logo
